pip3 file in Scripts folder is missing - Python installation - Tensor flow upgrade

2017-12-03 Thread pavan kopparthi 
Hi,

Installed Python 3.6.3 Amd64 in Windows 10 OS.

Want to install Tensor flow using native pip as suggested...

C:\> *pip3 install --upgrade tensorflow*

But, observed that pip3 file in Scripts folder is missing. Also, Scripts
folder is empty.

Reg,
Pavan Kumar K.



<#m_1095693827828497751_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Meaning of "Add Python to environment variables"

2017-12-03 Thread John Yeung 
In the custom installation options for Python 3.6, what *exactly* does "Add 
Python to environment variables" mean?

Which environment variables are we talking about? I imagine one of them would 
have to be PATH. Are there any others?

John Y.
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: urllib2 urlopen takes too much time

2017-12-03 Thread cpollio 
On Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 11:09:30 PM UTC-4, Aahz wrote:
> In article ,
> =?UTF-8?Q?Filip_Gruszczy=C5=84ski?=   wrote:
> >
> >I have encountered a performance problem using suds, which was traced
> >down to _socket.recv. I am calling some web services and each of them
> >uses about 0.2 sec and 99% of this time is spent on urllib2.urlopen,
> >while the rest of the call is finished in milliseconds. 
> 
> What happens if you use urlopen() by itself?
> -- 
> Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com)   <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
> 
> "as long as we like the same operating system, things are cool." --piranha

I am having the same issue.  Did you ever figure out a solution?  The time 
delay is also the same, from .2 to .25 sec.  I need to stay with urlopen though 
so I can do a custom request header
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Meaning of "Add Python to environment variables"

2017-12-03 Thread Thomas Jollans 
On 03/12/17 18:32, John Yeung wrote:
> In the custom installation options for Python 3.6, what *exactly* does "Add 
> Python to environment variables" mean?
> 
> Which environment variables are we talking about? I imagine one of them would 
> have to be PATH. Are there any others?


If the note on the "PrependPath" option in
https://docs.python.org/3/using/windows.html#installing-without-ui is
complete (which I believe it is, but I couldn't swear to it), it's PATH
and PATHEXT.

-- Thomas
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: urllib2 urlopen takes too much time

2017-12-03 Thread Python 
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 09:49:45AM -0800, cpol...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 11:09:30 PM UTC-4, Aahz wrote:
> > In article ,
> > =?UTF-8?Q?Filip_Gruszczy=C5=84ski?=   wrote:
> > >
> > >I have encountered a performance problem using suds, which was traced
> > >down to _socket.recv. I am calling some web services and each of them
> > >uses about 0.2 sec and 99% of this time is spent on urllib2.urlopen,
> > >while the rest of the call is finished in milliseconds. 
> > 
> > What happens if you use urlopen() by itself?
> 
> I am having the same issue.  Did you ever figure out a solution?
> The time delay is also the same, from .2 to .25 sec.  I need to stay
> with urlopen though so I can do a custom request header

Depending on your network conditions, this doesn't seem all that
outrageous.  Using tcpdump or some other packet sniffer should reveal
what is going on, but most likely urlopen() needs to do all of the
following, every time it is called:

  - resolve the address via DNS
 + 1 round trip: DNS request + response; possibly more if DNS
   doesn't have host entry and forwards...
  - initiate a TCP connection
 + three way handshake = 1.5 round trip times
  - send the request (.5 round trip)
  - wait for server processing (unknown time)
  - receive the response (.5 round trip time)

If the DNS server is busy, or the SOAP server is busy, add that
latency to the mix.  Assuming NO latency due to server load, you're
still looking at 3.5 round trips to service the request, or 7 one-way
(possibly 6, if the ACK contains the request, which IIRC is allowed).
.2s / 7 = ~29ms, so if the latency between server and client is 29ms
or higher, that explains everything.  On a LAN I'd hope for much
better than 29ms latency (1ms is more typical), but it's not outside
the realm of possibility depending on network architecture and load.
Ping to the server will tell you that... if your network isn't
blocking ICMP.

If the C# app is faster, my guess would be it is caching the DNS
response and/or maintaining persistent connections to the server,
whereas urllib isn't, though that's just a guess... I'm not familiar
with the implementations of either.  But again, a packet sniffer
should show you exactly what's happening and who is being slow. 

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list