Test bank and Solutions Manual for Microeconomics (8th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics) 8th Edition, 8th e, 8e by Jeffrey M. Perloff
Dear Students, To get Test bank and Solutions Manual for Microeconomics (8th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics) 8th Edition,8th e,8e by Jeffrey M. Perloff Contact us 24/7 at smtbportal @ gmail dot com, smtbportal @ hotmail . com Please DO NOT POST/REPLY HERE, just email us at smtbportal (@) gmail (dot) com Good Luck with your Exams. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Test bank and Solutions Manual for Managerial Accounting 6th Edition,8th e,8e by John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta
Dear Students, To get Test bank and Solutions Manual for Managerial Accounting 6th Edition,8th e,8e by John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Contact us 24/7 at smtbportal @ gmail dot com, smtbportal @ hotmail . com Please DO NOT POST/REPLY HERE, just email us at smtbportal (@) gmail (dot) com Good Luck with your Exams. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Test bank and Solutions Manual for Criminology Today: An Integrative Introduction 8th Edition,8th e,8e by Frank Schmalleger
Dear Students, To get Test bank and Solutions Manual for Criminology Today: An Integrative Introduction 8th Edition,8th e,8e by Frank Schmalleger Contact us 24/7 at smtbportal @ gmail dot com, smtbportal @ hotmail . com Please DO NOT POST/REPLY HERE, just email us at smtbportal (@) gmail (dot) com Good Luck with your Exams. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Test bank and Solutions Manual for Intermediate Accounting 9th Edition,9th e,9e by J. David Spiceland,Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Dear Students, To get Test bank and Solutions Manual for Intermediate Accounting 9th Edition,9th e,9e by J. David Spiceland,Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas Contact us 24/7 at smtbportal @ gmail dot com, smtbportal @ hotmail . com Please DO NOT POST/REPLY HERE, just email us at smtbportal (@) gmail (dot) com Good Luck with your Exams. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Test bank and Solutions Manual for Financial Accounting 17th Edition, 8th e, 8e by Jan Williams, Susan Haka, Mark S Bettner, Joseph V Carcello
Dear Students, To get Test bank and Solutions Manual for Financial Accounting 17th Edition,8th e,8e by Jan Williams,Susan Haka,Mark S Bettner, Joseph V Carcello Contact us 24/7 at smtbportal @ gmail dot com, smtbportal @ hotmail . com Please DO NOT POST/REPLY HERE, just email us at smtbportal (@) gmail (dot) com Good Luck with your Exams. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Test bank and Solutions Manual for ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2nd Edition,2nd e,2e by Richardson,Janie Chang Vern Odmark,Rod E. Smith
Dear Students, To get Test bank and Solutions Manual for ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2nd Edition,2nd e,2e by Richardson,Janie Chang Vern Odmark,Rod E. Smith Contact us 24/7 at smtbportal @ gmail dot com, smtbportal @ hotmail . com Please DO NOT POST/REPLY HERE, just email us at smtbportal (@) gmail (dot) com Good Luck with your Exams. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Test bank and Solutions Manual for Managerial Accounting 16th Edition,16th e, 16e by Ray H Garrison, Eric Noreen, Peter C. Brewer
Dear Students, To get Test bank and Solutions Manual for Managerial Accounting 16th Edition,16th e, 16e by Ray H Garrison, Eric Noreen, Peter C. Brewer Contact us 24/7 at smtbportal @ gmail dot com, smtbportal @ hotmail . com Please DO NOT POST/REPLY HERE, just email us at smtbportal (@) gmail (dot) com Good Luck with your Exams. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Test bank and Solutions Manual for McGraw-Hill's Essentials of Federal Taxation 2018 Edition 9th Edition,9th e,9e by Brian C. Spilker, Benjamin C. Ayers, John Robinson, Edmund Outslay, Worsham, Barric
Dear Students, To get Test bank and Solutions Manual for McGraw-Hill's Essentials of Federal Taxation 2018 Edition 9th Edition,9th e,9e by Brian C. Spilker,Benjamin C. Ayers,John Robinson,Edmund Outslay,Worsham,Barrick,Weaver Contact us 24/7 at smtbportal @ gmail dot com, smtbportal @ hotmail . com Please DO NOT POST/REPLY HERE, just email us at smtbportal (@) gmail (dot) com Good Luck with your Exams. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Test bank and Solutions Manual for Financial Accounting Fundamentals 6th Edition,6th e,6e by John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw,Chiappetta
Dear Students, To get Test bank and Solutions Manual for Financial Accounting Fundamentals 6th Edition,6th e,6e by John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw,Chiappetta Contact us 24/7 at smtbportal @ gmail dot com, smtbportal @ hotmail . com Please DO NOT POST/REPLY HERE, just email us at smtbportal (@) gmail (dot) com Good Luck with your Exams. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: import issues python3.4
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 at 15:58 Heli wrote: > Is there anyway I can run my external script without changing the absolute > path from (1) to (2) in my code. > I would recommend using tox [0] to run your test script, and setting up an entry point in your `setup.py` [1] so that your `main` command is "installed" when you install the package. This also means that regular users of your package will be able to run the script by just typing the command name you choose, instead of needing to know exactly where the package got installed. > I use subprocess.call to run main.py within my external script and it gets > few arguments to run. tox handles setting up a virtualenv & installing your packages into it, which means in the context of your tox run, when your test script calls out to your `main` "entry point" using `subprocess.call` it will be available in the local $PATH [0] https://tox.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ [1] http://setuptools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/setuptools.html#dynamic-discovery-of-services-and-plugins -- -- Matt Wheeler http://funkyh.at -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What is the future of the PEP 467?
What is the future of the PEP 467 ("Minor API improvements for binary
sequences")? It was not accepted and was not rejected, although there was a
rather active discussion.
In addition to what is stated in the PEP, I would like to know your opinion
on the additional issue:
At present, the repr() and str() of bytes return the same thing - which
looks more as "binary string". May be it is better if the repr() will
return "binary sequence" -> only escaped hex values. While the str()
representation would return the same thing as now (some ascii analogue)?
- with kind regards, gdg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: What is the future of the PEP 467?
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Kirill Balunov wrote:
> What is the future of the PEP 467 ("Minor API improvements for binary
> sequences")? It was not accepted and was not rejected, although there was a
> rather active discussion.
I don't know. This is probably a question for python-dev.
> In addition to what is stated in the PEP, I would like to know your opinion
> on the additional issue:
> At present, the repr() and str() of bytes return the same thing - which
> looks more as "binary string". May be it is better if the repr() will
> return "binary sequence" -> only escaped hex values.
Why would this be better? For bytes objects that are based on ASCII or
UTF-8 strings it will make them harder to read. For users who might be
using the repr() to serialize the bytes object, it will make the
serialization larger. Also, the str() of a container like a list uses
the repr() of its contents, so while readability is not the main goal
of a repr() it is still a good thing to have.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Ideas about how software should behave
On 11/8/17 3:05 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: Jon Ribbens : It is my experience of this group/list that if one disagrees with any of you, Steve and Chris, you all rally round and gang up on that person to insult and belittle them. This makes the atmosphere quite hostile, and it would be quite remarkable if it isn't hurting the community by driving people away. Please stop doing it. This forum is about a dead thing, a programming language. I wouldn't make too big a deal about "the community." If someone's postings constantly frustrate you, simply place them in your killfile. I've done that to people. People have done that to me. Tolerating bad behavior and advising people to cope by kill-filing is terrible advice. It means the bad behavior continues, unseen by regulars, and newcomers find a place rife with muck, unaddressed. Use a kill file if you like, but that is not the way the group as a whole is going to deal with it. --Ned. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Ideas about how software should behave
On 11/8/17 10:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
How many paragraphs of close parsing are we going to twist ourselves
through, just to avoid saying, "Yeah, sorry, that went a bit far. I
didn't want to alienate you in the pursuit of a demonstration of my
own correctness."
I don't have any aim of avoiding that. If I need to apologise for
something, that hasn't been made clear to me. If you're seeking an
apology from someone else, I can't do it for them.
You have nothing to apologize for. This started because of an exchange
between Steve and Jon. Steve has been notably silent during the ensuing
discussion.
What has been made clear to me is that we have a long way to go in
pursuit of allowing ideas to be held at arm's length, discussed and
criticised, with respect and compassion for one another.
Indeed. Beyond just respect and compassion, this discussion has
mentioned "changing people's minds" a few times. How's that going?
Calling an idea "arrogant" may or may not be reasonable (I'm divided on
this question myself). But is it an effective way to change the
person's mind? It's a great term to use if you want to smack someone
down, and convince everyone else that you are right. But it's going to
put the other person on the defensive, and you've lost your chance to
change their mind.
Both of the terms that have been brought up recently ("arrogant" and
"moronic") seem ineffective to me. If the goal truly is to engage in a
discussion that will bring everyone to a point of agreement, then we
have to choose words more wisely. These words seem to me to have been
chosen with a different goal.
--Ned.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Ideas about how software should behave
Ned Batchelder writes: > On 11/8/17 10:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > > What has been made clear to me is that we have a long way to go in > > pursuit of allowing ideas to be held at arm's length, discussed and > > criticised, with respect and compassion for one another. > > Indeed. Beyond just respect and compassion, this discussion has > mentioned "changing people's minds" a few times. How's that going? Impressively well, in my opinion. This is a forum that is worthy of its reputation for respecting its participants by critically examining problems and ideas, while resisting personal abuse. That's valuable to me, which is why I am passionately defending that tradition. -- \ “The only tyrant I accept in this world is the still voice | `\ within.” —Mohandas K. Gandhi | _o__) | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Ideas about how software should behave
On 11/10/17 6:03 PM, Ben Finney wrote: Ned Batchelder writes: On 11/8/17 10:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote: What has been made clear to me is that we have a long way to go in pursuit of allowing ideas to be held at arm's length, discussed and criticised, with respect and compassion for one another. Indeed. Beyond just respect and compassion, this discussion has mentioned "changing people's minds" a few times. How's that going? Impressively well, in my opinion. It seems to me that Steve has not changed Jon's mind at all. Abrasive words don't change people's minds. --Ned. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Ideas about how software should behave
Ned Batchelder writes: > On 11/10/17 6:03 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > > Ned Batchelder writes: > >> Beyond just respect and compassion, this discussion has mentioned > >> "changing people's minds" a few times. How's that going? > > Impressively well, in my opinion. > > It seems to me that Steve has not changed Jon's mind at all. Oh, my comment wasn't intending to speak for any of the participants in this thread on whether their minds are changed. I didn't realise that's what you wanted to ascertain. I was giving the general response that, admirably often, I see people's opinions changed here as a result of discussing an idea and critically examining it, respecting the members here to engage with ideas and get to the truth of a matter. It works well, and it's a reason I recommend people to this forum. -- \ “That's all very good in practice, but how does it work in | `\ *theory*?” —anonymous | _o__) | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Ideas about how software should behave
Ned Batchelder : > On 11/8/17 3:05 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >> If someone's postings constantly frustrate you, simply place them in >> your killfile. I've done that to people. People have done that to me. > > Tolerating bad behavior and advising people to cope by kill-filing is > terrible advice. It means the bad behavior continues, unseen by > regulars, and newcomers find a place rife with muck, unaddressed. Use > a kill file if you like, but that is not the way the group as a whole > is going to deal with it. Outright abuse should not be tolerated; that's just general humanity. However, not all obnoxiousness is abuse. If a thread is off topic or too long, or if someone has an irritating style or frustrates you otherwise, the best way to deal with it is to skip the discussion or plonk the individual. I don't believe I normally would use such crude expressions myself, but calling some idea idiocy in an intellectual debate is *not* automatically abuse. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
