Running programs on mobile phones

2014-04-22 Thread Mok-Kong Shen


I have seen by chance a number of years ago a book on Python programming
for running on mobile phones (of a certain producer only). What is the
current state of the art in that? Could someone kindly give a few good
literature references? Thanks in advance.

M. K. Shen
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread wxjmfauth
Le mardi 22 avril 2014 08:30:45 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit :
> 
> 
> 

@ rusy

> "Ive reworded it to make it clear that I am referring to the
character-sets and not encodings."

Very good, excellent, comment. An healthy coding scheme can only
work properly with a unique characters set and the coding is achieved
with the help of a unique operator. There is no other way to do it
and that's the reason why we have to live today with all these
coding schemes (unicode or not). Note: A coding scheme can be
much more complex than the coding of "raw" characters (eg. CID
fonts).
> "So instead of using λ (0x3bb) we should use  𝝀 (0x1d740)  or something 
> thereabouts like 𝜆"

This is a very good understanding of unicode. The letter lambda
is not the mathematical symbole lambda. Another example,
the micro sign is not the greek letter mu which is not the mathematical
mu. Shorly, it's maybe not a bad idea to use a plain ascii "lambda"
instead of a wrong unicode point.

jmf


-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: How to properly get the microseconds from the timestamps?

2014-04-22 Thread Vlastimil Brom
2014-04-22 4:38 GMT+02:00 Igor Korot :
...
 datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(1092787200/1000.0)
> datetime.datetime(1970, 1, 13, 7, 33, 7, 20)
>
> Is there a way to know if the timestamp has a microseconds?
>
> Thank you.
> --
Hi,
I believe, in these cases, you can just test, whether there is a
non-integer part in the timestamp in seconds, which will be stored as
microseconds accordingly.
>>> 1092787200/1000.0
1092787.2
0.2 s is stored (and shown in repr(...)) as  20  microseconds.

There are some peculiarities in handling date and time calculations
reliably as well as in the floating point math, but they don't seem to
be involved here.
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Best Website Design Services by Professional Web Designing Company

2014-04-22 Thread aveinfosys
Ave Infosys is a leading professional in Web Designing Company in Hyderabad 
India for the 

E-Business Industry.Ave Infosys are providing Best Website Development and 
Design Services 

in Hyderabad.Our company offers the Best Web Design & Development services, Web 
Hosting 

Services,Responsive and Mobile Designing services,Ecommerce websites 
services,Digital 

Marketing Services,Website Design Services. We have intensive web design and 
web skills 

merging with the quality essence of expertise should have component to help you 
to ascertain 

your internet presence or take it to the next level.we are the Best Web Design 
Company in 

Hyderabad.

For More Details :

Please contact: (+91) 40 40275321

Email : i...@aveinfosys.com

Web : http://aveinfosys.com/website-design
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread Rustom Mody
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 12:01:06 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2014 12:01 AM, "Rustom Mody"  wrote:
> > As a unicode user (ok wannabe unicode user :D ) Ive
> > written up some unicode ideas that have been discussed here in the
> > last couple of weeks:
> > http://blog.languager.org/2014/04/unicoded-python.html
> I'm reminded of this satire:
> http://www.ojohaven.com/fun/spelling.html

Ha Ha!! Thanks much for that.

Ive been looking for that for years but had no starting point for a
search
[For some reason I always thought it was Bernard Shaw]
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


[ANN] Pylint 1.2 released

2014-04-22 Thread Sylvain Thénault
Hi there,

Pylint 1.2 has been uploaded to pypi by the end of the last week! More info on 
this heavy release on http://www.logilab.org/blogentry/240019.

As usual, feedback and comments welcome.

Enjoy!
-- 
Sylvain Thénault, LOGILAB, Paris (01.45.32.03.12) - Toulouse (05.62.17.16.42)
Formations Python, Debian, Méth. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations
Développement logiciel sur mesure:   http://www.logilab.fr/services
CubicWeb, the semantic web framework:http://www.cubicweb.org
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Antoon Pardon
I am workin on a solaris 11 machine. The python version is 2.7.6
path to python is /opt/local/bin/python.

These are the 15 first lines of the script:

#! /opt/local/bin/python

class vslice(object):

def __init__(self, fun):
self.fun = fun

def __getitem__(self, inx):
if not isinstance(inx, tuple):
inx = inx,
#if
return self.fun(*inx)
#end __getitem__
#end __vslice__

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Now if I execute the script by explicitly calling the interpreter
everything works fine.

# /opt/local/bin/python /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch /opt/local/log/openldap.log | 
head
Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 fd=125 ACCEPT from IP=10.0.59.10:46238 
(IP=10.0.128.65:389)
Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=0 BIND 
dn="uid=anonymous,ou=local,ou=people,o=global" method=128
Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=0 BIND 
dn="uid=anonymous,ou=local,ou=people,o=global" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0
Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=1 SRCH base="ou=people,o=global" scope=2 deref=0 
filter="(uid=anonymous)"
Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=1 text=
Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=2 UNBIND
Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 fd=125 closed

Apr 21 15:12:57 conn=110983 fd=125 ACCEPT from IP=10.1.28.235:39616 
(IP=10.0.128.65:389)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

However if I call the script directly and want the #! line do its work I get 
the following error.

# /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch /opt/local/log/openldap.log | head
/usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
/usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: `class vslice(object):'

I have no idea what is going on here. The persmision for 
/usr/local/bin/ldapwatch look fine:
# ls -l /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2092 Apr 22 10:05 
/usr/local/bin/ldapwatch


Does anyone have an idea where I should look to fix this?

-- 
Antoon Pardon

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Tim Golden
On 22/04/2014 11:29, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> I am workin on a solaris 11 machine. The python version is 2.7.6
> path to python is /opt/local/bin/python.
> 
> These are the 15 first lines of the script:
> 
> #! /opt/local/bin/python
> 
> class vslice(object):
> 
> def __init__(self, fun):
> self.fun = fun
> 
> def __getitem__(self, inx):
> if not isinstance(inx, tuple):
> inx = inx,
> #if
> return self.fun(*inx)
> #end __getitem__
> #end __vslice__
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 
> Now if I execute the script by explicitly calling the interpreter
> everything works fine.
> 
> # /opt/local/bin/python /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch /opt/local/log/openldap.log 
> | head
> Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 fd=125 ACCEPT from IP=10.0.59.10:46238 
> (IP=10.0.128.65:389)
> Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=0 BIND 
> dn="uid=anonymous,ou=local,ou=people,o=global" method=128
> Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=0 BIND 
> dn="uid=anonymous,ou=local,ou=people,o=global" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0
> Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
> Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=1 SRCH base="ou=people,o=global" scope=2 
> deref=0 filter="(uid=anonymous)"
> Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=1 text=
> Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 op=2 UNBIND
> Apr 21 15:12:38 conn=110982 fd=125 closed
> 
> Apr 21 15:12:57 conn=110983 fd=125 ACCEPT from IP=10.1.28.235:39616 
> (IP=10.0.128.65:389)
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 
> However if I call the script directly and want the #! line do its work I get 
> the following error.
> 
> # /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch /opt/local/log/openldap.log | head
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: `class vslice(object):'
> 
> I have no idea what is going on here. The persmision for 
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch look fine:
> # ls -l /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2092 Apr 22 10:05 
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch

Look for a dodgy line-feed / cr (or some other non-visible control
character) at the end of the shebang line?

TJG

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Frank Millman

"Antoon Pardon"  wrote in message 
news:535644a4.6060...@rece.vub.ac.be...
>I am workin on a solaris 11 machine. The python version is 2.7.6
> path to python is /opt/local/bin/python.
>
[...]
>
> Now if I execute the script by explicitly calling the interpreter
> everything works fine.
>
[...]
>
> However if I call the script directly and want the #! line do its work I 
> get the following error.
>
> # /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch /opt/local/log/openldap.log | head
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: `class vslice(object):'
>

I had something similar and it turned out that my script had 'CRLF' line 
endings instead of 'LF' only, and this caused the problem. I believe that 
the problem has nothing to do with python, but with how the shell interprets 
the '#!' line.

My editor allows me to re-save a file using a different format, so I saved 
it as 'unix', reran it, and it worked.

HTH

Frank Millman



-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Antoon Pardon
On 22-04-14 12:42, Frank Millman wrote:
> "Antoon Pardon"  wrote in message 
> news:535644a4.6060...@rece.vub.ac.be...
>> I am workin on a solaris 11 machine. The python version is 2.7.6
>> path to python is /opt/local/bin/python.
>>
> [...]
>> Now if I execute the script by explicitly calling the interpreter
>> everything works fine.
>>
> [...]
>> However if I call the script directly and want the #! line do its work I 
>> get the following error.
>>
>> # /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch /opt/local/log/openldap.log | head
>> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
>> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: `class vslice(object):'
>>
> I had something similar and it turned out that my script had 'CRLF' line 
> endings instead of 'LF' only, and this caused the problem. I believe that 
> the problem has nothing to do with python, but with how the shell interprets 
> the '#!' line.
>
> My editor allows me to re-save a file using a different format, so I saved 
> it as 'unix', reran it, and it worked.

My editor shows me a CR in the file. Just to be sure I used od -c on the file,
this is the result:

# od -c /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch | head -30
000   #   !   /   o   p   t   /   l   o   c   a   l   /   b   i
020   n   /   p   y   t   h   o   n  \n  \n   c   l   a   s   s
040   v   s   l   i   c   e   (   o   b   j   e   c   t   )   :  \n
060  \n  \t   d   e   f   _   _   i   n   i   t   _   _   (   s
100   e   l   f   ,   f   u   n   )   :  \n  \t  \t   s   e   l
120   f   .   f   u   n   =   f   u   n  \n  \n  \t   d   e
140   f   _   _   g   e   t   i   t   e   m   _   _   (   s   e
160   l   f   ,   i   n   x   )   :  \n  \t  \t   i   f   n
200   o   t   i   s   i   n   s   t   a   n   c   e   (   i   n
220   x   ,   t   u   p   l   e   )   :  \n  \t  \t  \t   i   n
240   x   =   i   n   x   ,  \n  \t  \t   #   i   f  \n  \t
260  \t   r   e   t   u   r   n   s   e   l   f   .   f   u   n
300   (   *   i   n   x   )  \n  \t   #   e   n   d   _   _   g
320   e   t   i   t   e   m   _   _  \n   #   e   n   d   _   _
340   v   s   l   i   c   e   _   _  \n  \n   @   v   s   l   i   c
360   e  \n   d   e   f   p   r   o   j   e   c   t   (   l   s
400   t   ,   *   a   r   g   v   )   :  \n  \t   r   e   s   u
420   l   t   =   [   ]  \n  \t   f   o   r   a   r   g
440   i   n   a   r   g   v   :  \n  \t  \t   t   m   p
460   =   l   s   t   [   a   r   g   ]  \n  \t  \t   i   f
500   i   s   i   n   s   t   a   n   c   e   (   a   r   g   ,
520   s   l   i   c   e   )   :  \n  \t  \t  \t   r   e   s   u   l
540   t   .   e   x   t   e   n   d   (   t   m   p   )  \n  \t  \t
560   e   l   s   e   :  \n  \t  \t  \t   r   e   s   u   l   t   .
600   a   p   p   e   n   d   (   t   m   p   )  \n  \t  \t   #   i
620   f  \n  \t   #   f   o   r  \n  \t   r   e   t   u   r   n
640   r   e   s   u   l   t  \n   #   e   n   d   p   r   o   j
660   e   c   t  \n  \t  \t  \n   i   m   p   o   r   t   s   y
700   s  \n  \n   d   e   f   I   s   N   o   n   e   (   a   r
720   g   )   :  \n  \t   r   e   t   u   r   n   a   r   g

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

I see nothing that can cause a problem. I tried to search more specifically
for troublesome characters but that didn't turn up anything.

# od -c /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch | head -30 | grep '\\[^nt]' 
# 

So all special characters are either newlines or tabs.

-- 
Antoon Pardon

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Antoon Pardon
 wrote:
> However if I call the script directly and want the #! line do its work I get 
> the following error.
>
> # /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch /opt/local/log/openldap.log | head
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: `class vslice(object):'

That looks like bash trying to run Python code, so I'd look at
something being wrong with the shebang processing. What's
/opt/local/bin/python? Is it a symlink to something else? Some systems
won't allow any such dereferencing, others (including modern Linux)
allow a maximum of ten or thereabouts, counting one for every symlink
or shebang'd script. If /opt/local/bin/python is a bouncer script that
itself has a shebang, that might be your problem.

ChrisA
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly [solved]

2014-04-22 Thread Antoon Pardon
On 22-04-14 14:09, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Antoon Pardon
>  wrote:
>> However if I call the script directly and want the #! line do its work I get 
>> the following error.
>>
>> # /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch /opt/local/log/openldap.log | head
>> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
>> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: `class vslice(object):'
> That looks like bash trying to run Python code, so I'd look at
> something being wrong with the shebang processing. What's
> /opt/local/bin/python? Is it a symlink to something else? Some systems
> won't allow any such dereferencing, others (including modern Linux)
> allow a maximum of ten or thereabouts, counting one for every symlink
> or shebang'd script. If /opt/local/bin/python is a bouncer script that
> itself has a shebang, that might be your problem.
>
> ChrisA

Yes that was it. I changed the first line of my script to:

#!/opt/local/bin/python2.7

and it now works.

Thanks.
-- 
Antoon Pardon
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 02:07:58 -0700, wxjmfauth wrote:

> Le mardi 22 avril 2014 08:30:45 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> @ rusy
> 
>> "Ive reworded it to make it clear that I am referring to the
> character-sets and not encodings."
> 
> Very good, excellent, comment. An healthy coding scheme can only work
> properly with a unique characters set and the coding is achieved with
> the help of a unique operator. There is no other way to do it and that's
> the reason why we have to live today with all these coding schemes
> (unicode or not). Note: A coding scheme can be much more complex than
> the coding of "raw" characters (eg. CID fonts).
>> "So instead of using λ (0x3bb) we should use  𝝀 (0x1d740)  or 
>> something thereabouts like 𝜆"

For those who cannot see them, they are:

py> unicodedata.name('\U0001d740')
'MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC SMALL LAMDA'
py> unicodedata.name('\U0001d706')
'MATHEMATICAL ITALIC SMALL LAMDA'


("LAMDA" is the official Unicode name for Lambda.)

 
> This is a very good understanding of unicode. The letter lambda is not
> the mathematical symbole lambda. Another example, the micro sign is not
> the greek letter mu which is not the mathematical mu. 

Depends what you mean by "is not". The micro sign is a legacy 
compatibility character, we shouldn't use it except for compatibility 
with legacy (non-Unicode) character sets. Instead, we should use the NFKC 
or NFKD normalization forms to convert it to the recommended character.


py> import unicodedata
py> a = '\N{GREEK SMALL LETTER MU}'  # Preferred
py> b = '\N{MICRO SIGN}'  # Legacy
py> a == b
False
py> unicodedata.normalize('NFKD', b) == a
True
py> unicodedata.normalize('NFKC', b) == a
True

As for the mathematical mu, there is no separate Unicode "maths symbol 
mu" so far as I am aware. One would simply use '\N{MICRO SIGN}' or 
'\N{GREEK SMALL LETTER MU}' to get a μ.

Likewise, the λ used in mathematics is the Greek letter λ, not a separate 
symbol, just like the Latin letter x and the x used in mathematics are 
the same.




-- 
Steven D'Aprano
http://import-that.dreamwidth.org/
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly [solved]

2014-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Antoon Pardon
 wrote:
> Yes that was it. I changed the first line of my script to:
>
> #!/opt/local/bin/python2.7
>
> and it now works.

Excellent! Shebangs are *extremely* specific, so you may want to
consider using "/usr/bin/env python" to get a bit more flexibility.
(Or "python2" or "python2.7" in place of "python", depending on how
specific you want to be.)

ChrisA
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:29:56 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:

> I am workin on a solaris 11 machine. The python version is 2.7.6 path to
> python is /opt/local/bin/python.

Are you sure about that? You ought to double check that /opt/local/bin/
python is what you think it is, and not (say) a symlink to a different 
binary.


> These are the 15 first lines of the script:
> 
> #! /opt/local/bin/python

This being Solaris, what happens if you remove the space between the hash-
bang and the path? On Linux it makes no difference, but Solaris tends to 
be a bit more idiosyncratic about things like this.



[...]
> However if I call the script directly and want the #! line do its work I
> get the following error.
> 
> # /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch /opt/local/log/openldap.log | head
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
> /usr/local/bin/ldapwatch: line 3: `class vslice(object):'

That's not a Python syntax error, so its something else failing before 
Python gets to see it. The only way I can reproduce this is to execute 
Python code using sh:

[steve@ando ~]$ cat ./test2
class X(object):
pass

print X
[steve@ando ~]$ ./test2
./test2: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./test2: line 1: `class X(object):'


> Does anyone have an idea where I should look to fix this?

Ask your local Solaris expert :-)

This appears to be the same symptoms:

http://www.linuxmisc.com/12-unix-shell/581d028236386dae.htm



-- 
Steven D'Aprano
http://import-that.dreamwidth.org/
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Steven D'Aprano
 wrote:
>> These are the 15 first lines of the script:
>>
>> #! /opt/local/bin/python
>
> This being Solaris, what happens if you remove the space between the hash-
> bang and the path? On Linux it makes no difference, but Solaris tends to
> be a bit more idiosyncratic about things like this.

I'm pretty sure the POSIX standard stipulates that a space there is
optional. Should be no difference between "#!/" and "#! /" on any
compliant OS. (But I can't right now find a citation for that, so I
may be wrong.)

ChrisA
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly [solved]

2014-04-22 Thread Antoon Pardon
On 22-04-14 14:26, Chris Angelico wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Antoon Pardon
>  wrote:
>> Yes that was it. I changed the first line of my script to:
>>
>> #!/opt/local/bin/python2.7
>>
>> and it now works.
> Excellent! Shebangs are *extremely* specific, so you may want to
> consider using "/usr/bin/env python" to get a bit more flexibility.

The problem with that is that it doesn't work if python is not on
the (standard) path, like in this case.

-- 
Antoon Pardon


-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly [solved]

2014-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Antoon Pardon
 wrote:
> On 22-04-14 14:26, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Antoon Pardon
>>  wrote:
>>> Yes that was it. I changed the first line of my script to:
>>>
>>> #!/opt/local/bin/python2.7
>>>
>>> and it now works.
>> Excellent! Shebangs are *extremely* specific, so you may want to
>> consider using "/usr/bin/env python" to get a bit more flexibility.
>
> The problem with that is that it doesn't work if python is not on
> the (standard) path, like in this case.

Ah! Well, that's why I said "consider using" rather than "you should use" :)

ChrisA
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Tim Chase
On 2014-04-22 22:52, Chris Angelico wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the POSIX standard stipulates that a space there is
> optional. Should be no difference between "#!/" and "#! /" on any
> compliant OS. (But I can't right now find a citation for that, so I
> may be wrong.)

I wondered this too, so went researching and found this:

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_%28Unix%29#Magic_number

which said that there was actually some contention that the space was
required, but that the specs state that both with-and-without are
permissible.

-tkc




-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Tim Chase
 wrote:
> On 2014-04-22 22:52, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure the POSIX standard stipulates that a space there is
>> optional. Should be no difference between "#!/" and "#! /" on any
>> compliant OS. (But I can't right now find a citation for that, so I
>> may be wrong.)
>
> I wondered this too, so went researching and found this:
>
>   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_%28Unix%29#Magic_number
>
> which said that there was actually some contention that the space was
> required, but that the specs state that both with-and-without are
> permissible.

Yeah, I read the Wikipedia page, but was looking for a citable
standards document, and didn't find one. (Which may just mean I didn't
look hard enough. Wasn't going to spend an hour on it.)

ChrisA
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Best Website Design Services by Professional Web Designing Company

2014-04-22 Thread alister
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 02:21:01 -0700, aveinfosys wrote:

> Ave Infosys is a leading professional in Web Designing Company in
> Hyderabad India for the
> 
> E-Business Industry.Ave Infosys are providing Best Website Development
> and Design Services
> 
> in Hyderabad.Our company offers the Best Web Design & Development
> services, Web Hosting
> 
> Services,Responsive and Mobile Designing services,Ecommerce websites
> services,Digital
> 
> Marketing Services,Website Design Services. We have intensive web design
> and web skills
> 
> merging with the quality essence of expertise should have component to
> help you to ascertain
> 
> your internet presence or take it to the next level.we are the Best Web
> Design Company in
> 
> Hyderabad.
> 
> For More Details :
> 
> Please contact: (+91) 40 40275321
> 
> Email : i...@aveinfosys.com
> 
> Web : http://aveinfosys.com/website-design

Considering the poor quality of your own site it is hardly surprising 
that you have to resorts to spamming a totally unrelated newsgroup/
mailing list.



-- 
Cache miss - please take better aim next time
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Google open positions at Shanghai/China ?

2014-04-22 Thread Wesley
Hi guys,
  Anybody know if there are openning positions at Shanghai, China?
Just ask for one of my friend in case someone here woring for Google:-)
Although see some opened positions from google career, seems no actaully hire 
going on.

Thanks.
Wesley
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Best Website Design Services by Professional Web Designing Company

2014-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:40 PM, alister
 wrote:
> Considering the poor quality of your own site it is hardly surprising
> that you have to resorts to spamming a totally unrelated newsgroup/
> mailing list.

If you *must* respond to spam, please at least trim out the URLs so
they don't get free exposure...

ChrisA
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Best Website Design Services by Professional Web Designing Company

2014-04-22 Thread alister
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:35:37 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:40 PM, alister
>  wrote:
>> Considering the poor quality of your own site it is hardly surprising
>> that you have to resorts to spamming a totally unrelated newsgroup/
>> mailing list.
> 
> If you *must* respond to spam, please at least trim out the URLs so they
> don't get free exposure...
> 
> ChrisA

Sorry :-(



-- 
In the force if Yoda's so strong, construct a sentence with words in
the proper order then why can't he?
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread wxjmfauth
Le mardi 22 avril 2014 14:21:40 UTC+2, Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 02:07:58 -0700, wxjmfauth wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > Le mardi 22 avril 2014 08:30:45 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit :
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> 
> 
> > @ rusy
> 
> > 
> 
> >> "Ive reworded it to make it clear that I am referring to the
> 
> > character-sets and not encodings."
> 
> > 
> 
> > Very good, excellent, comment. An healthy coding scheme can only work
> 
> > properly with a unique characters set and the coding is achieved with
> 
> > the help of a unique operator. There is no other way to do it and that's
> 
> > the reason why we have to live today with all these coding schemes
> 
> > (unicode or not). Note: A coding scheme can be much more complex than
> 
> > the coding of "raw" characters (eg. CID fonts).
> 
> >> "So instead of using λ (0x3bb) we should use  𝝀 (0x1d740)  or 
> 
> >> something thereabouts like 𝜆"
> 
> 
> 
> For those who cannot see them, they are:
> 
> 
> 
> py> unicodedata.name('\U0001d740')
> 
> 'MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC SMALL LAMDA'
> 
> py> unicodedata.name('\U0001d706')
> 
> 'MATHEMATICAL ITALIC SMALL LAMDA'
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ("LAMDA" is the official Unicode name for Lambda.)
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> > This is a very good understanding of unicode. The letter lambda is not
> 
> > the mathematical symbole lambda. Another example, the micro sign is not
> 
> > the greek letter mu which is not the mathematical mu. 
> 
> 
> 
> Depends what you mean by "is not". The micro sign is a legacy 
> 
> compatibility character, we shouldn't use it except for compatibility 
> 
> with legacy (non-Unicode) character sets. Instead, we should use the NFKC 
> 
> or NFKD normalization forms to convert it to the recommended character.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> py> import unicodedata
> 
> py> a = '\N{GREEK SMALL LETTER MU}'  # Preferred
> 
> py> b = '\N{MICRO SIGN}'  # Legacy
> 
> py> a == b
> 
> False
> 
> py> unicodedata.normalize('NFKD', b) == a
> 
> True
> 
> py> unicodedata.normalize('NFKC', b) == a
> 
> True
> 
> 
> 
> As for the mathematical mu, there is no separate Unicode "maths symbol 
> 
> mu" so far as I am aware. One would simply use '\N{MICRO SIGN}' or 
> 
> '\N{GREEK SMALL LETTER MU}' to get a μ.
> 
> 
> 
> Likewise, the λ used in mathematics is the Greek letter λ, not a separate 
> 
> symbol, just like the Latin letter x and the x used in mathematics are 
> 
> the same.
> 
> 

Normalization is working fine, but it proofs nothing, it
has to use some convention.

There are several code points ranges (latin + greek), which can
be used for mathematical purpose (different mu's).

If you are interested, search for "unimath-symbols.pdf"
on CTAN (I have all this stuff on my hd).

...
"Likewise, the λ used in mathematics is the Greek letter λ, not a separate
symbol, just like the Latin letter x and the x used in mathematics are
the same. "... just like the Latin letter x and the x used in mathematics
are the same.
...

Oh! Definitively not. A tool with an unicode engine able to
produce "math text" will certainly not use the same code point
for a "textual x" or for a "mathematical x", even if one
enter/type/hit the same "x".

To be exaggeratedly stict, the real question is to know
if a used "lambda" or "x" belongs to a "math unicode range"
or not. This is quite a different approach. (Please no
confusion with a "text litteral variable x").

A text processing tool will notice the difference, it will
use different fonts.

jmf
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Running programs on mobile phones

2014-04-22 Thread Miki Tebeka
> I have seen by chance a number of years ago a book on Python programming
> for running on mobile phones (of a certain producer only). What is the
> current state of the art in that? Could someone kindly give a few good
> literature references? Thanks in advance.
I'm not an expert, but take a look at http://kivy.org/.
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread Rustom Mody
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 12:01:06 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2014 12:01 AM, "Rustom Mody"  wrote:
> > As a unicode user (ok wannabe unicode user :D ) Ive
> > written up some unicode ideas that have been discussed here in the
> > last couple of weeks:
> > http://blog.languager.org/2014/04/unicoded-python.html
> I'm reminded of this satire:
> http://www.ojohaven.com/fun/spelling.html

At the risk of 'explaining the joke' I believe it becomes comical due
to the cumulating effect of suggesting ← for assignment and then using that.
Since I dont like its look in any fonts that I can check, I am returning the
(subsequent) examples to to good (or bad) old =

Also the λ is unnecessarily contentions.  Been replaced by more
straightforward introductory examples.
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


analyse Chinese language using Python code

2014-04-22 Thread linda.s
How to analyse Chinese language using Python code?
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: analyse Chinese language using Python code

2014-04-22 Thread haiticare2011
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:04:39 PM UTC-4, linda.s wrote:
> How to analyse Chinese language using Python code?

You will need to program a pattern recognizer system. Are you interested in 
spoken chinese or written Kanji? 
xie xie
JB
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Glade on Windows using Python

2014-04-22 Thread mbg1708
Using Windows 8.1 Update.
I've loaded ActiveState python (version 2.7) --- installed OK.
I don't need Glade, but I do want to use some Glade XML and run the python 
application.
To run a Glade application this needs:

 from gi.repository import Gtk

gi.repository is not available to import.

Where can I find gi.repository?all searches to date have come up empty!

Mary
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Why does isoformat() optionally not print the fractional seconds?

2014-04-22 Thread Travis Griggs
Python(3) let me down today. Better to be explicit, and all that, didn’t pan 
out for me.

I have time series data being recorded in a mongo database (I love pymongo). I 
have an iOS app that consumes the data. Since JSON doesn’t have a time format, 
I have to stringify the times when transmitting between the two. To parse it on 
the obj-c side, I use 

NSDateFormatter *parser = [NSDateFormatter new];
parser = [NSTimeZone timeZoneWithAbbreviation:@"GMT"];
[parser setDateFormat:@"-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.S”];
NSDate *date = [parser dateFromString: thatJsonString];

Which was working swimmingly, until I started getting occasional and infrequent 
nil dates at times. I thought I had a storage issue or something with my REST 
api, or the server, or something. But it was simply now and then again, why 
1000’s of data points, I managed to get 0 milliseconds from time to time, which 
resulted in the isoformat() I was using to suddenly leave off the .S part of 
the string. And since the parse then failed, the iOS side decided it wasn’t 
valid and returned a nil.

Haven’t decided where/how I’ll work around it yet, but the isoformat() seemed 
unpythonic to me today.

Thanks for hearing me whine.

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 22/04/2014 13:52, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>  wrote:
>>> These are the 15 first lines of the script:
>>>
>>> #! /opt/local/bin/python
>>
>> This being Solaris, what happens if you remove the space between the hash-
>> bang and the path? On Linux it makes no difference, but Solaris tends to
>> be a bit more idiosyncratic about things like this.
> 
> I'm pretty sure the POSIX standard stipulates that a space there is
> optional. Should be no difference between "#!/" and "#! /" on any
> compliant OS. (But I can't right now find a citation for that, so I
> may be wrong.)
> 
> ChrisA
> 

man execve

4.3BSD implicitly mandates a space given its description of the shebang
line, while POSIX simply implies the presence of a space.

I have recently had to check this point.  All current kernel
implementations I cared to check would strip whitespace around the
interpreter, although Solaris was not one such implementation.

~Andrew
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly [solved]

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 22/04/2q014 13:26, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Antoon Pardon
>  wrote:
>> Yes that was it. I changed the first line of my script to:
>>
>> #!/opt/local/bin/python2.7
>>
>> and it now works.
> 
> Excellent! Shebangs are *extremely* specific, so you may want to
> consider using "/usr/bin/env python" to get a bit more flexibility.
> (Or "python2" or "python2.7" in place of "python", depending on how
> specific you want to be.)
> 
> ChrisA
> 

`man execve`

"The interpreter must be a valid pathname for an executable which is not
itself a script."

This is (presumably) to avoid recursive walks of the filesystem trying
to locate a valid interpreter to splat over the virtual address space of
the currently executing process.

~Andrew
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Strange syntax error, occurs only when script is executed directly [solved]

2014-04-22 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 22/04/2q014 13:26, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Antoon Pardon
>  wrote:
>> Yes that was it. I changed the first line of my script to:
>>
>> #!/opt/local/bin/python2.7
>>
>> and it now works.
> 
> Excellent! Shebangs are *extremely* specific, so you may want to
> consider using "/usr/bin/env python" to get a bit more flexibility.
> (Or "python2" or "python2.7" in place of "python", depending on how
> specific you want to be.)
> 
> ChrisA
> 

`man execve`

"The interpreter must be a valid pathname for an executable which is not
itself a script."

This is (presumably) to avoid recursive walks of the filesystem trying
to locate a valid interpreter to splat over the virtual address space of
the currently executing process.

~Andrew
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Why does isoformat() optionally not print the fractional seconds?

2014-04-22 Thread MRAB

On 2014-04-23 01:05, Travis Griggs wrote:

Python(3) let me down today. Better to be explicit, and all that, didn’t pan 
out for me.

I have time series data being recorded in a mongo database (I love pymongo). I 
have an iOS app that consumes the data. Since JSON doesn’t have a time format, 
I have to stringify the times when transmitting between the two. To parse it on 
the obj-c side, I use

 NSDateFormatter *parser = [NSDateFormatter new];
 parser = [NSTimeZone timeZoneWithAbbreviation:@"GMT"];
 [parser setDateFormat:@"-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.S”];
 NSDate *date = [parser dateFromString: thatJsonString];

Which was working swimmingly, until I started getting occasional and infrequent 
nil dates at times. I thought I had a storage issue or something with my REST 
api, or the server, or something. But it was simply now and then again, why 
1000’s of data points, I managed to get 0 milliseconds from time to time, which 
resulted in the isoformat() I was using to suddenly leave off the .S part of 
the string. And since the parse then failed, the iOS side decided it wasn’t 
valid and returned a nil.

Haven’t decided where/how I’ll work around it yet, but the isoformat() seemed 
unpythonic to me today.

Thanks for hearing me whine.


Omitting fractional seconds is permitted by the standard. There was a
thread last year about it:

Making datetime __str__ and isoformat more consistent
https://mail.python.org/pipermail//python-ideas/2013-November/023913.html

--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread Rustom Mody
Chris Angelico wrote:
> it's impossible for most people to type (and programming with a palette
> of arbitrary syntactic tokens isn't my idea of fun)...

Where's the suggestion to use a "palette of arbitrary tokens" ?

I just tried a greek keyboard; ie do
$ setxkbmap -option "grp:switch,grp:alt_shift_toggle,grp_led:scroll" -layout 
"us,gr"

Thereafter typing
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
after a Shift-Alt
gives
αβψδεφγηιξκλμνοπ;ρστθωςχυζ

One more Shift-Alt and back to roman

IOW the extra typing cost for greek letters is negligible
over the corresponding roman ones

Of course
- One would need to define such a keyboard (setxkb)
- One would have to find similar technologies for other OSes (Im on
debian; even ubuntu/unity grabs too many keys)
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


object().__dict__

2014-04-22 Thread Pavel Volkov

There are some basics about Python objects I don't understand.
Consider this snippet:


class X: pass
... 

x = X()
dir(x)
['__class__', '__delattr__', '__dict__', '__dir__', '__doc__', '__eq__', 
'__format__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__gt__', '__hash__', 
'__init__', '__le__', '__lt__', '__module__', '__ne__', '__new__', 
'__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', '__setattr__', '__sizeof__', 
'__str__', '__subclasshook__', '__weakref__']

x.foo = 11


And now I want to make a simple object in a shorter way, without declaring 
X class:



y = object()
dir(y)
['__class__', '__delattr__', '__dir__', '__doc__', '__eq__', '__format__', 
'__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__gt__', '__hash__', '__init__', '__le__', 
'__lt__', '__ne__', '__new__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', 
'__setattr__', '__sizeof__', '__str__', '__subclasshook__']

y.foo = 12

Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "", line 1, in 
AttributeError: 'object' object has no attribute 'foo'

The attribute list is different now and there's no __dict__ and the object 
does not accept new attributes.

Please explain what's going on.

--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Rustom Mody  wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>> it's impossible for most people to type (and programming with a palette
>> of arbitrary syntactic tokens isn't my idea of fun)...
>
> Where's the suggestion to use a "palette of arbitrary tokens" ?
>
> I just tried a greek keyboard; ie do
> $ setxkbmap -option "grp:switch,grp:alt_shift_toggle,grp_led:scroll" -layout 
> "us,gr"
>
> Thereafter typing
> abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
> after a Shift-Alt
> gives
> αβψδεφγηιξκλμνοπ;ρστθωςχυζ
>
> One more Shift-Alt and back to roman

Okay. Now what about your other symbols? Your alternative assignment
operator, for instance. How do you type that?

ChrisA
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:31:41 -0700, Rustom Mody wrote:

> Chris Angelico wrote:
>> it's impossible for most people to type (and programming with a palette
>> of arbitrary syntactic tokens isn't my idea of fun)...
> 
> Where's the suggestion to use a "palette of arbitrary tokens" ?
> 
> I just tried a greek keyboard; ie do
> $ setxkbmap -option "grp:switch,grp:alt_shift_toggle,grp_led:scroll"
> -layout "us,gr"
> 
> Thereafter typing
> abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
> after a Shift-Alt
> gives
> αβψδεφγηιξκλμνοπ;ρστθωςχυζ
> 
> One more Shift-Alt and back to roman
> 
> IOW the extra typing cost for greek letters is negligible over the
> corresponding roman ones


25 Unicode characters down, 1114000+ to go :-)

There's not just the keyboard mapping. There's the mental cost of knowing 
which keyboard mapping you need ("is it Greek, Hebrew, or maths 
symbols?"), the cost of remembering the mapping from the keys you see on 
the keyboard to the keys they are mapped to ("is Ω mapped to O or W?") 
and so forth. If you know lambda-calculus, you might associate λ with 
functions, but if you don't, it's as obfuscated as associating Ч with 
raising exceptions.

if not isinstance(obj, int):
ЧTypeError("expected an int, got %r" % type(obj))




-- 
Steven
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: object().__dict__

2014-04-22 Thread Ben Finney
Pavel Volkov  writes:

> The attribute list is different now and there's no __dict__ and the
> object does not accept new attributes.
> Please explain what's going on.

It's a leaky abstraction, unfortunately.

By default, all user-defined types will provide their instances with a
‘__dict__’ attribute, whic is a mapping to store the instance's
attributes.

But some types don't have that, and ‘object’ is one of them. It
deliberately overrides the default behaviour, and has no ‘__dict__’ for
its instances.

>>> foo = object()

>>> foo.bar = "spam"
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in 
AttributeError: 'object' object has no attribute 'bar'

>>> foo.__dict__
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in 
AttributeError: 'object' object has no attribute '__dict__'

Your user-defined types, even though they inherit from ‘object’, will
get a ‘__dict__’ as normal::

>>> class Bag:
>>> """ A simple type to hold attributes. """

>>> Bag.__mro__
(, )

>>> foo = Bag()
>>> foo.bar = "spam"
>>> foo.__dict__
{'bar': 'spam'}

See the discussion of ‘__slots__’, and note also that it's not
recommended to use this unless you know exactly why you need it
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#slots>.

I consider it a wart of Python that its ‘object’ instances lack the
ability to gain arbitrary attributes in the way you expect.

-- 
 \  “Every man would like to be God, if it were possible; some few |
  `\  find it difficult to admit the impossibility.” —Bertrand |
_o__)Russell, _Power: A New Social Analysis_, 1938 |
Ben Finney

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: object().__dict__

2014-04-22 Thread Cameron Simpson

On 23Apr2014 09:39, Pavel Volkov  wrote:

There are some basics about Python objects I don't understand.
Consider this snippet:


class X: pass

...

x = X()
dir(x)
['__class__', '__delattr__', '__dict__', '__dir__', '__doc__', 
'__eq__', '__format__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__gt__', 
'__hash__', '__init__', '__le__', '__lt__', '__module__', '__ne__', 
'__new__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', '__setattr__', 
'__sizeof__', '__str__', '__subclasshook__', '__weakref__']

x.foo = 11


And now I want to make a simple object in a shorter way, without 
declaring X class:



y = object()
dir(y)
['__class__', '__delattr__', '__dir__', '__doc__', '__eq__', 
'__format__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__gt__', '__hash__', 
'__init__', '__le__', '__lt__', '__ne__', '__new__', '__reduce__', 
'__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', '__setattr__', '__sizeof__', '__str__', 
'__subclasshook__']

y.foo = 12

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in 
AttributeError: 'object' object has no attribute 'foo'

The attribute list is different now and there's no __dict__ and the 
object does not accept new attributes.

Please explain what's going on.


The base "object" class has a fixed set of attributes; you can't add more.

Almost every other class lets you add attributes, but the price for that is 
that it is slightly in memory footprint and slower to access.


Look up the "__slots__" dunder var in the Python doco index:

  https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-slots

You'll see it as a (rarely used, mostly discouraged) way to force a fixed set 
of attributes onto a class. As with object, this brings a smaller memory 
footprint and faster attribute access, but the price is flexibility.


Cheers,
Cameron Simpson 

Try being nothing but bored for 4 hours straight, and then tell me that
there's no fear involved.   - d...@elxr.jpl.nasa.gov (Dave Hayes)
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread Devin Jeanpierre
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Steven D'Aprano  wrote:
> There's not just the keyboard mapping. There's the mental cost of knowing
> which keyboard mapping you need ("is it Greek, Hebrew, or maths
> symbols?"), the cost of remembering the mapping from the keys you see on
> the keyboard to the keys they are mapped to ("is Ω mapped to O or W?")
> and so forth. If you know lambda-calculus, you might associate λ with
> functions, [...]

Or if you know Python and the name of the letter ("lambda").

But yes, typing out the special characters is annoying. I just use
words. The only downside to using words is, how do you specify capital
versus lowercase letters? "Gamma = ..." violates the style guide! :(

-- Devin
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Unicode in Python

2014-04-22 Thread Ben Finney
Devin Jeanpierre  writes:

> But yes, typing out the special characters is annoying. I just use
> words.

I use words that describe the meaning, where feasible.

> The only downside to using words is, how do you specify capital
> versus lowercase letters?

Why do you need to, for an identifier? If uppercase gamma is
semantically different from lowercase gamma for identifying a value,
then both are too terse and the meaning should be spelled out in a
better chosen semantic name.

-- 
 \   “Some people have a problem, and they think “I know, I'll use |
  `\ Perl!”. Now they have some number of problems but they're not |
_o__) sure whether it's a string or an integer.” —Benno Rice, 2011 |
Ben Finney

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list