Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 465: A dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication
Guido, I am sorry to read this. I shall be responding more completely in a day or two. In my view, @ and @@ are completely redundant. Both operations are already provided, * and **, in numpy.matrix. PEP 465 provides no clear indication as to how the standard operators fail. Larry Hastings wasn't far from the truth. Thanks for all the work you have put into Python and continue to do. Best wishes, Colin W. ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 465: A dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication
Guido, I am sorry to read this. I shall be responding more completely in a day or two. In my view, @ and @@ are completely redundant. Both operations are already provided, * and **, in numpy.matrix. PEP 465 provides no clear indication as to how the standard operators fail. Larry Hastings wasn't far from the truth. Thanks for all the work you have put into Python and continue to do. Best wishes, Colin W. ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
