Re: [Python-Dev] Reviewing PEP 580
On Tue., 12 Feb. 2019, 9:04 am Jeroen Demeyer Hello, > > I would like to propose to the new steering council to review PEP 580. > Is there already a process for that? > Hi Jeroen, We're still considering the details of how PEP 1 is going to be adjusted for a Steering Council rather than a BDFL. Once the Council members are clear on how *we* think that should work (probably via discussion on a draft PR against PEP 1), then python-dev will be the first to know. Cheers, Nick. > > > ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] [bpo-35155] Requesting a review
Hello all, A couple months back, I reported bpo-35155[1] and I submitted a PR for consideration[2]. After a couple of reviews, it seems like progress has stalled. Would it be possible for someone to review this? Thanks, Denton [1]: https://bugs.python.org/issue35155 [2]: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10313 ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] [docs] [issue35155] Requesting a review
Hello all, A couple months back, I reported bpo-35155[1] and I submitted a PR for it[2]. After a couple of reviews, it seems like progress has stalled. Would it be possible for someone to review this? Thanks, Denton [1]: https://bugs.python.org/issue35155 [2]: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10313 ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] [bpo-35155] Requesting a review
On 2/12/2019 5:14 AM, Denton Liu wrote: Hello all, A couple months back, I reported bpo-35155[1] and I submitted a PR for consideration[2]. After a couple of reviews, it seems like progress has stalled. Would it be possible for someone to review this? Thanks, Denton [1]: https://bugs.python.org/issue35155 [2]: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10313 The problem is that the urllib.request doc has several 'placeholder-literal' and 'literal-placeholder' constructs where 'literal' is text that the user *must copy* while 'placeholder' is text that the user *must replace* with one of several strings, with no evident indication of which is which. (The constructs indicate possible allowed names of user-supplied functions.) The only issue to me is how to indicate in the .rst source (and resulting html) that 'placeholder' is a placeholder and not a literal. -- Terry Jan Reedy ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] [bpo-35155] Requesting a review
On 2/12/2019 3:24 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: The problem is that the urllib.request doc has several 'placeholder-literal' and 'literal-placeholder' constructs where Correction: The result must be a legal function name, so that should be 'placeholder_literal' and 'literal_placeholder', where the '_' is part of the literal. -- Terry Jan Reedy ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] 2.7.16 release dates
Greetings, I've set the dates for the 2.7.16 release in PEP 373. The release candidate will happen on February 16 with a final release 2 weeks later on March 2 if all goes well. Servus, Benjamin ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
