Re: [Python-Dev] Do windows 10 users, like windows 7 users need to install a SP before installing Python will work?
In a message of Mon, 07 Dec 2015 14:03:41 -0800, Steve Dower writes: >On 07Dec2015 1324, Steve Dower wrote: >> On 07Dec2015 1250, Laura Creighton wrote: >>> As webmaster, I am dealing with 3 unhappy would-be python users who have >>> windows 10. >>> > > >Not directly related to this thread, but I just pushed an update to the >Windows installers for 3.5.1. (Should avoid people being confused when >the py.exe launcher is removed on upgrade from 3.5.0.) > >There's a chance that people installing over the next 5-10 minutes will >see issues. If anyone asks, just let them know to clear their download >cache and redownload the installer. > >Apologies in advance for the extra support requests this will generate, >and thank you to everyone who helps out by patiently dealing with them. > >Cheers, >Steve I am happy to report that one of my outstanding problems was just fixed by this. It seems that without the launcher he could not find his Python. Many other people who just couldn't get things to work with Windows 10 and 3.5 report that 3.5.1 fixed things for them, once the download button started working for them. And one person, who was a clear member of the would-be scientific python community I just pointed at Anaconda Python and he reports happiness (which is good, because I never understood from his mail what his problem was in the first place.) I still have one who is having problems. We are working on a manual install and he is hitting this: https://bugs.python.org/issue25144 But, all in all, I can report a great increase in happiness in my corner of the world. Thank you and Congratulations. Laura ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] A function for Find-Replace in lists
Hi,I think it could be helpful for everyone if the function proposed by user "SomethingSomething" can be added as built-in in PythonSee both question by "SomethingSomething" and answer to himself with implementation..http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34174643/python-find-replace-on-listsThanks___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] A function for Find-Replace in lists
On 12/9/2015 6:43 AM, טל ח wrote: I think it could be helpful for everyone if the function proposed by user "SomethingSomething" can be added as built-in in Python See both question by "SomethingSomething" and answer to himself with implementation.. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34174643/python-find-replace-on-lists Please submit a specific proposal to python-ideas list. Use normal left-justified plain text formatting. -- Terry Jan Reedy ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] A function for Find-Replace in lists
On Dec 9, 2015, at 03:43, טל ח wrote: > > Hi, > > I think it could be helpful for everyone if the function proposed by user > "SomethingSomething" can be added as built-in > in Python Why? When he was asked what use it might have, he didn't have an answer. Also, notice that the answer he provided doesn't actually do what he asked for; as he himself points out, it's different in at least two ways from his stated requirements. So, which one of the two do you want? And why is that one, rather than the other, useful? Also, why would you call this list_replace? That sounds like a function that would replace elements with elements, not make a copy with elements replaced by new lists flattened into place. Also, why would you only want this lists, rather than for any iterable? And what can it do that this more general and completely trivial function can't: def flattening_subst(iterable, value, sequence): for x in iterable: if x == value: yield from sequence else: yield x If you know of another language whose standard library has an equivalent, that might narrow down exactly what the requirements are, point at an implementation that actually meets those requirements, and probably provide examples that hint at the point of having this function in the first place. > See both question by "SomethingSomething" and answer to himself with > implementation.. > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34174643/python-find-replace-on-lists > > > Thanks ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
