On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Where in the tracker? I tried searching but didn’t find it.
>
This one: http://bugs.python.org/issue13475
This and the issue about being able to configure coverage.py cleanly in
subprocesses (http://bugs.python.org/issue14803) are the two issues which
have got me thinking about the interpreter startup and configuration
process in general lately. Both would add *more* complexity to an already
complicated and hard to follow initialisation sequence, so I now think we
should be look at opportunities for rationalisation *first*, before we make
things even messier.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com