Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r73569 - peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt
On Jun 26, 2009, at 8:49 AM, benjamin.peterson wrote: Author: benjamin.peterson Date: Fri Jun 26 14:48:55 2009 New Revision: 73569 Log: update release candidate shorthand Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt Modified: peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt = = = = = = = = == --- peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt (original) +++ peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt Fri Jun 26 14:48:55 2009 @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ We use the following conventions in the examples below. Where a release number is given, it is of the form X.YaZ, e.g. 2.6a3 for Python 2.6 alpha -3, where "a" == alpha, "b" == beta, "c" == release candidate. +3, where "a" == alpha, "b" == beta, "rc" == release candidate. Final releases are named "releaseXY". The branch tag is "releaseXY-maint" because this will point to the long lived maintenance branch. The fork I'm sure this has been discussed but I missed it. Why was this change made? If nothing else, it breaks many years of tradition. -Barry PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r73569 - peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt
2009/6/26 Barry Warsaw : > I'm sure this has been discussed but I missed it. Why was this change made? > If nothing else, it breaks many years of tradition. I assumed it was the tradition because all the 3.0 and 2.6 candidates had "rc". -- Regards, Benjamin ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r73569 - peps/trunk/pep-0101.txt
While we are on that, I just noticed: http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.1/ Has downloads for 3.1rc2, but show checksums as if for 3.1rc1 The size and checksum is correct for python-3.1rc2.msi, distinct from that for python-3.1rc1.msi, but are labeled as rc1. The 32-bit .msi is the only one of the four I checked; I suspect the other three are similarly mislabeled. --Scott David Daniels [email protected] ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (06/19/09 - 06/26/09) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue number. Do NOT respond to this message. 2242 open (+17) / 15925 closed (+16) / 18167 total (+33) Open issues with patches: 889 Average duration of open issues: 657 days. Median duration of open issues: 408 days. Open Issues Breakdown open 2212 (+17) pending30 ( +0) Issues Created Or Reopened (33) ___ test_with.py has a couple minor mistakes 06/19/09 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue6313created exarkun patch logging.basicConfig(level='DEBUG', ... 06/20/09 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue6314created alexl locale._build_localename(locale.getdefaultlocale()) returns 'C.m 06/20/09 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue6315created sjt format, str.format don't work well with datetime, date object06/20/09 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue6316created falsetru winsound.PlaySound doesn't accept non-unicode string 06/21/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6317created ocean-city patch HTMLParser Attributes Containing Escaped Quotes 06/21/09 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue6318created ericryk bdist_msi runs out of memory for large packages 06/21/09 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue6319created bethard patch Standard string encodings should include GSM0.38 06/21/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6320created jwishnie Reload Python modules when running programs 06/22/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6321created samwyse Pdb breakpoints don't work on lines without bytecode 06/22/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6322created inducer Py3.1 pdb doesn't deal well with syntax errors 06/22/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6323created inducer patch, needs review "in" expression falls back to __iter__ before __getitem__06/22/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6324created afoglia robotparser doesn't handle URL's with query strings 06/23/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6325created skybrian Add a "swap" method to list 06/23/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6326created krisvale patch, patch [mimetext] long lines get cut with exclamation mark and newline 06/23/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6327created martijntje login() function failed in smtplib with message "argument 1 must 06/23/09 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue6328created hdvision Fix iteration for memoryviews06/23/09 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue6329created rhettinger patch trunk does not build with --enable-unicode=ucs4 06/23/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6330created eric.smith easy Add unicode script info to the unicode database 06/23/09 http://bugs.python.org/issue6331created doerwalter patch
Re: [Python-Dev] ndPython: I NEED TO TALK WITH ONE OF THE PYTHON CORE
Thanks for your answers. Sorry for the title in upper case. I didn't want to create troubles. :) I've an important question for you: is it possible that a large python module, created using SWIG and with a hundred of routines, makes slower the execution (i.e. the job of ceval.c) of the Python interpreter ? We've observed that, if we don't import ndpsp.pyc at startup, the time of execution of a loop containing the pass instruction becomes near normal. How Python recalls the C functions in a C wrapper ? Thanks for your very important help. Filippo Battaglia ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] ndPython: I NEED TO TALK WITH ONE OF THE PYTHON CORE
Filippo Battaglia wrote: Thanks for your answers. Sorry for the title in upper case. I didn't want to create troubles. :) I've an important question for you: is it possible that a large python module, created using SWIG and with a hundred of routines, makes slower the execution (i.e. the job of ceval.c) of the Python interpreter ? If you were running on a PC with what is now considered to be very small memory, I would hypothesize that you had filled memory so that the interpreter or parts thereof were being swapped in and out of memory from and to disk. Is any thing like that possible with the PSP? Next, I would wonder whether any module, as part of its initialization, was doing anything 'unusual' with respect to its interaction with the interpreter. We've observed that, if we don't import ndpsp.pyc at startup, the time of execution of a loop containing the pass instruction becomes near normal. What happens if you divide the imported stuff in half? Do both halves slow it down? Neither? Just one? The answer to that would be a start to answering whether the specific problem is quantitative or qualitative. Terry Jan Reedy ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
