Re: [Python-Dev] Proposed unittest changes
Neal Norwitz wrote: [Michael working on cleaning up the unittest module] it seems like most of the good ideas have been captured already. I'll through two more (low priority) ideas out there. 1) Randomized test runner/option that runs tests in a random order (like regrtest.py -r, but for methods) Should be easy enough. 2) decorator to verify a test method is supposed to fail #2 is useful for getting test cases into the code sooner rather than later. I'm pretty sure I have a patch that implements this (http://bugs.python.org/issue1399935). It didn't fit in well with the old unittest structure, but seems closer to the direction you are headed. We normally just prefix the test name with 'DONT' so that it isn't actually run... One other idea that probably ought not be done just yet: add a way of failing with the test continuing. We use this at work (not in Python though) and when used appropriately, it works quite well. It provides more information about the failure. It looks something like this: def testMethod(self): # setup self.assertTrue(precondition) self.expectTrue(value) self.expectEqual(expected_result, other_value) All the expect methods duplicate the assert methods. Asserts can the test to fail immediately, expects don't fail immediately allowing the test to continue. All the expect failures are collected and printed at the end of the method run. I was a little skeptical about assert vs expect at first, but it has proven useful in the long run. As I said, I don't think this should be done now, maybe later. n I like this pattern. Michael Foord ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] segfault in 2.5.1
Attempt to write to a mmap which was opened mmap.PROT_READ causes python to segfault. ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] segfault in 2.5.1
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attempt to write to a mmap which was opened mmap.PROT_READ causes python > to > segfault. http://bugs.python.org/issue2111 ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] mmap documentation error (2.5.1)
mmap( fileno, length[, flags[, prot[, access]]]) (Unix version) Maps length bytes from the file specified by the file descriptor fileno, and returns a mmap object. If length is 0, the maximum length of the map will be the current size of the file when mmap() is called. flags specifies the nature of the mapping. MAP_PRIVATE creates a private copy-on-write mapping, so changes to the contents of the mmap object will be private to this process, and MAP_SHARED creates a mapping that's shared with all other processes mapping the same areas of the file. The default value is MAP_SHARED. Apparantly, this is wrong - the default is not MAP_SHARED, as I just found out the hard way. ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] mmap documentation error (2.5.1)
Sorry, my mistake. Acutally, I was trying to debug this:
On linux, I don't understand why:
f = open ('/dev/eos', 'rw')
m = mmap.mmap(f.fileno(), 100, prot=mmap.PROT_READ|mmap.PROT_WRITE,
flags=mmap.MAP_SHARED)
gives 'permission denied', but this c++ code works:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main() {
int fd = open ("/dev/eos", O_RDWR);
void* m = mmap (NULL, 100, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
std::cout << m << '\n';
}
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] mmap documentation error (2.5.1)
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008, Neal Becker wrote: > > Sorry, my mistake. Acutally, I was trying to debug this: python-dev is probably not the right place for this -- please use c.l.py or the list capi-sig. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ Why is this newsgroup different from all other newsgroups? ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] Summary of Tracker Issues
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (04/18/08 - 04/25/08) Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue number. Do NOT respond to this message. 1850 open (+26) / 12667 closed (+11) / 14517 total (+37) Open issues with patches: 558 Average duration of open issues: 707 days. Median duration of open issues: 1333 days. Open Issues Breakdown open 1828 (+26) pending22 ( +0) Issues Created Or Reopened (37) ___ Create ctypes instances from buffer interface04/18/08 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue2655created theller patch, patch Autodoc should skip inherited methods04/18/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2656created jmillikin curses 04/18/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2657created fer_perez decode_header() fails on multiline headers 04/19/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2658created cschnee textwrap handling of hyphenation 04/19/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2659created fourmanoit patch Py3k fails to parse a file with an iso-8859-1 string 04/19/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2660created azverkan Mapping tests cannot be passed by user implementations 04/19/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2661created danderson Allows HUGE_VAL as extern variable 04/20/08 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue2662created ocean-city patch shutil.copytree glob-style filtering [patch] 04/20/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2663created tarek patch The position of special value tables (cmathmodule.c) 04/21/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2664created ocean-city patch unable to launch IDLE on windows XP 04/21/08 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue2665created Leo webbrowser.py doesn't properly handle BROWSER env var04/21/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2666created phd patch Remove multiple inheritance in Python 3000 04/22/08 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue2667created gmarketer apply() documentation is slightly incorrect 04/22/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2668created belopolsky bsddb iterkeys sliently fails when database modified during iter 04/22/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2669created tebeka urllib2 build_opener() fails if two handlers use the same defaul 04/22/08 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue2670created tlynn PyErr_WarnPy3k 04/22/08 http://bugs.python.org/issue2671created benjamin.peterson patch speed of set.update( 04/23/08 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue2672created jameinel error on optparse page 04/23/08 CLOSED http://bugs.python.org/issue2673created fbe2 unittest.TestProgram uses sys.exit()
[Python-Dev] Do we still need BaseAddress in .vcproj files?
I just did this locally to all my .vcproj files for .pyds: - BaseAddress="0x1e00" + RandomizedBaseAddress="2" This was partly out of curiosity, and partly because it was quicker doing that than finding a new unique base address to use for a new module I added to my local tree. Rebuilt everything and ran a full regression test, and everything passed. What am I missing? Do we have parts of Python that rely on finding modules at explicit base addresses? Is BaseAddress a relic from the past? Christian or Martin? Trent. ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Do we still need BaseAddress in .vcproj files?
Trent Nelson schrieb: > I just did this locally to all my .vcproj files for .pyds: > > - BaseAddress="0x1e00" > + RandomizedBaseAddress="2" > > This was partly out of curiosity, and partly because it was quicker doing > that than finding a new unique base address to use for a new module I added > to my local tree. Rebuilt everything and ran a full regression test, and > everything passed. What am I missing? Do we have parts of Python that rely > on finding modules at explicit base addresses? Is BaseAddress a relic from > the past? Christian or Martin? An explicit base address speeds up the loading of shared extension modules a bit. Checkout PC/dllbase_nt.txt Christian ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Do we still need BaseAddress in .vcproj files?
> This was partly out of curiosity, and partly because it was quicker > doing that than finding a new unique base address to use for a new > module I added to my local tree. Rebuilt everything and ran a full > regression test, and everything passed. What am I missing? Do we > have parts of Python that rely on finding modules at explicit base > addresses? Is BaseAddress a relic from the past? Christian or > Martin? As Christian says: specifying the base address so that the addresses don't overlap avoids having Windows to perform relocations on startup. There is a Microsoft tool (editbin /rebase) to compute non-overlapping base addresses for a given set of DLLs. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Do we still need BaseAddress in .vcproj files?
A while back I was reading an MSDN article that did some concrete research on the performance benefits of rebasing DLLs to avoid fixups at runtime, and it actually concluded that on modern systems, the benefits are really negligible. I tried finding the article on the net just now, though, and I couldn't, so don't take my word for it. This 1995 MSDN article provides an explanation and some raw numbers for systems at that time, though: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms810432.aspx - Atul On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This was partly out of curiosity, and partly because it was quicker > > doing that than finding a new unique base address to use for a new > > module I added to my local tree. Rebuilt everything and ran a full > > regression test, and everything passed. What am I missing? Do we > > have parts of Python that rely on finding modules at explicit base > > addresses? Is BaseAddress a relic from the past? Christian or > > Martin? > > As Christian says: specifying the base address so that the addresses > don't overlap avoids having Windows to perform relocations on startup. > > There is a Microsoft tool (editbin /rebase) to compute non-overlapping > base addresses for a given set of DLLs. > > Regards, > Martin > > ___ > Python-Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/varmaa%40gmail.com > ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] annoying dictionary problem, non-existing keys
2008/4/24 bvidinli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I posted to so many lists because, > > this issue is related to all lists, > this is an idea for python, > this is related to development of python... > > why are you so much defensive ? > > i think ideas all important for development of python, software > i am sory anyway hope will be helpful. Please consult the documentation first: http://docs.python.org/lib/typesmapping.html . You're looking for the get() method. This attribute of PHP is hardly considered a feature, and is not something Python wishes to emulate. Collin Winter > 2008/4/24, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Python-dev is for discussion of development of future Python. Use > > python-list / comp.lang.python / gmane.comp.python.general for usage > > questions. > > > > > > > > ___ > > Python-Dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/bvidinli%40gmail.com > > > > > > -- > İ.Bahattin Vidinli > Elk-Elektronik Müh. > --- > iletisim bilgileri (Tercih sirasina gore): > skype: bvidinli (sesli gorusme icin, www.skype.com) > msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > yahoo: bvidinli > > +90.532.7990607 > +90.505.5667711 > ___ > > > Python-Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/collinw%40gmail.com > ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
