[issue3934] sphinx - building muppy docs fails on Linux
New submission from robwolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I've tried to build muppy (http://packages.python.org/muppy/) documentation on: $ python2.5 -c "import sys; print sys.version" 2.5 (release25-maint, Dec 9 2006, 14:35:53) [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-20)] with Sphinx (version 0.4.2) and got this error: $ make doctest mkdir -p build/doctest sphinx-build -b doctest -d build/doctrees source build/doctest Sphinx v0.4.2, building doctest trying to load pickled env... not found building [doctest]: targets for 15 source files that are out of date updating environment: 15 added, 0 changed, 0 removed reading... changes copyright detailed_toc glossary index intro library/library library/muppy library/refbrowser Exception occurred: File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Sphinx-0.4.2-py2.5.egg/sphinx/ext/autodoc.py", line 313, in generate_rst if not mod_cls: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'mod_cls' referenced before assignment The full traceback has been saved in /tmp/sphinx-err-XRu3ZJ.log, if you want to report the issue to the author. Please also report this if it was a user error, so that a better error message can be provided next time. Send reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! make: *** [doctest] Błąd 1 The simple patch I've attached helped of course. -- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation tools (Sphinx) files: autodoc.patch keywords: patch messages: 73587 nosy: georg.brandl, robwolfe severity: normal status: open title: sphinx - building muppy docs fails on Linux type: crash versions: Python 2.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11560/autodoc.patch ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3934> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4246] execution model - clear and complete example in documentation
New submission from robwolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'd like to propose adding some complete example regarding scopes and bindings resolving to execution model description. There is no week on pl.comp.lang.python without a question about UnboundLocalError problem. I'm getting tired answering that. ;-) It does not have to look so verbose as my (attached) example, but please add some example, which will clarify this issue. -- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation files: scopes.py messages: 75441 nosy: georg.brandl, robwolfe severity: normal status: open title: execution model - clear and complete example in documentation type: feature request versions: Python 2.6 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11924/scopes.py ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4246> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4246] execution model - clear and complete example in documentation
robwolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: People seem to understand that they can not use variable before definition. But this dramatically change when they come across nested functions. They don't understand when variable can be resolved from outer scope and when can not, e.g: def outer(): x = 1 def inner1(): print(x) def inner2(): print(x) # [... some instructions (maybe a lot) ...] x = 1 They are always confused why `inner1` works but `inner2` doesn't. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4246> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
