[issue5360] RO (shorthand for READONLY) gone, not in documentation

[Rémi Koenig]

New submission from Rémi Koenig :

The Defining New Types document for python3
(http://docs.python.org/3.0/extending/newtypes.html) cites the RO macro
(which existed in versions < 3). However, it has been removed in py3k
(cf http://wiki.python.org/moin/Py3kExtensionModules or
python3.0/structmember.h).

--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
messages: 82670
nosy: Rémi, georg.brandl
severity: normal
status: open
title: RO (shorthand for READONLY) gone, not in documentation
type: compile error
versions: Python 3.0

___
Python tracker 
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5360>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue5360] RO (shorthand for READONLY) gone, not in documentation

[Rémi Koenig]

Rémi Koenig  added the comment:

Sorry to bother, but I just noticed that in this same document
(http://docs.python.org/3.0/extending/newtypes.html),
PyObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL) has not been replaced by
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL, 0).

___
Python tracker 
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5360>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com