New submission from Peter Thomassen:
The truth value of sets is not properly documented, in particular regarding
whether an empty set is considered false or not.
Ignoring primitive (such as numerals) as well as user-defined types,
https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#truth says:
> The following values are considered false:
>
> - [...]
> - any empty sequence, for example, '', (), [].
> - any empty mapping, for example, {}.
> - [...]
>
> All other values are considered true
According to
https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#sequence-types-list-tuple-range,
a set is not a sequence (it is unordered, its elements do not have indices,
etc.):
> There are three basic sequence types: lists, tuples, and range objects.
And, according to
https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#mapping-types-dict,
> There is currently only one standard mapping type, the dictionary.
So, as per the documentation, the set type is not a type that can ever be
False. However, when I try, bool(set()) evaluates to False.
When I asked this on Stack Overflow, someone checked in the CPython code and
judged that this is most likely a mere documentation issue:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/44813565/6867099
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 297268
nosy: docs@python, thomassen
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Truth value of sets not properly documented
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30803>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com