[issue24969] functools.lru_cache: a way to set decorator arguments at runtime
New submission from Marek Otahal: I'd like to use @lru_cache in a library. The problem is I can't know the optimal values for 'maxsize', I need to set them at runtime. I came with 2 possibilities: 1/ set cache's size from a hardcoded argument of the decorated method: @lru_cache def foo_long(self, arg1, ..., **kwds): pass # use foo_long('hi', cacheSize = 1000) This approach allows the users to customize cache size for their problem. 2/ from function's **kwds retrieve a name (string) of an instance member of the class which will hold the cache's size value. This is not as clean as 1/, but offers greated functionality for the use in a library sw: we can compute desired cache size from internal values of the unstance, and the use of cache can be totally transparent to the end user: @lru_cache def foo_long(self, arg1, .. , **kwds) #use foo_long('hi', cacheSizeRef='_cacheSize') What do you think about the proposal? best regards, Mark -- messages: 249406 nosy: Marek Otahal priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: functools.lru_cache: a way to set decorator arguments at runtime type: enhancement ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue24969> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24969] functools.lru_cache: a way to set decorator arguments at runtime
Marek Otahal added the comment: Hope this example is not too confusing, it's a patch to my code and lru_cache (backport for python 2.7 from ActiveState) It implements both approaches as highlighted above, and in the test both of them are used (that does not make much sense, normally one would use either of them only) -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue24969> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24969] functools.lru_cache: a way to set decorator arguments at runtime
Marek Otahal added the comment: Hi David, > How is (1) different from: @lru_cache(maxsize=1000) def foo_long(self, arg1...) As I mentioned, for use in a library that is called by end-users. They can call functions and modify params, but do not edit the code. It's up to me (lib devs) to prepare the cache decorator. Ie.: class MyLib(): @lru_cache def foo_long(self, arg1, **kwds): pass #user import MyLib i = MyLib() i.foo_long(1337) > As for computing it at runtime: if you need to compute it, you can compute it > and *then* define the decorator wrapped function. ditto as above, at runtime no new decorator definitions should be needed for a library. + a speed penalty, I'd have to wrap a wrapper in 1 or 2 more nested functions, which incures a speed penalty, and we're focusing at cache here. I esp. mention this as I've noticed the ongoing effort to use a C implementation of lru_cache here. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue24969> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24969] functools.lru_cache: a way to set decorator arguments at runtime
Marek Otahal added the comment: EDIT: > i.foo_long(1337) ofc, this should be: i.foo_long('hi', cacheSize=1337) or for (2): class MyLib(): def __init__(arg1, arg2): self._cacheSize = someComputation(arg1, arg2) # returns a number @lru_cache def foo_long(self, arg1, **kwds): pass #user import MyLib i = MyLib(100, 21) # not to make it so simple: i.changeInternalStateSomehow() # updates arg1, arg2, and also _cacheSize i.foo_long(1337, cacheSizeName='_cacheSize') # ref to self._cacheSize -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue24969> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com