[issue38052] Include sspipe Module with Core Python
New submission from Juan Telleria :
Could sspipe be included as a Core Python module?
https://sspipe.github.io/
https://github.com/sspipe/sspipe
https://pypi.org/project/sspipe/
sspipe allows to use syntax such as:
from sspipe import p, px
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
(
np.linspace(0, pi, 100)
| p({'x': px, 'y': np.sin(px)})
| p(pd.DataFrame)
| px[px.x > px.y].head()
| p(print, "Example 6: pandas and numpy support:\n", px)
)
--
components: Extension Modules
messages: 351307
nosy: Juan Telleria2
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Include sspipe Module with Core Python
versions: Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38052>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue38052] Include sspipe Module with Core Python
Change by Juan Telleria : -- type: -> enhancement ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue38052> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue38052] Include sspipe Module with Core Python
Juan Telleria added the comment: There was a positive response from package mantainers for this issue :) See: https://github.com/sspipe/sspipe/issues/4 >> is the module mature and stable? I am using this module in my own projects for a while and it satisfies my own requirements. However, I think if we want to propose it as a PEP, we should plan for a 1.0.0 release with some improvements on the API and documentation and tests. >> does it have an FOSS licence compatible with Python, and if not, are the >> authors willing to re-licence it? I am willing to re-licence it. >> are the authors willing to donate the module to Python? Yes >> are the authors happy to change their release schedule to match Python? Yes >> are they happy to adhere to Python's policy on backwards compatibility and >> new functionality? Yes >> are you (or the authors) willing to write a PEP proposing to add this module >> to the standard library? https://www.python.org/dev/peps/ Yes, with your contribution. >> can you find a Core Developer willing to sponsor this PEP? (You can probably >> ask on the Python-Dev or Python-Ideas mailing lists, or the Python Discuss, >> or face-to-face in person at a sprint, etc.) We may try. I will request support for this project in Python-Dev and Pytgon-Ideas during this week by sending an e-mail. Thank you also Steven for your bullet points to complete! Juan -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue38052> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue38052] Include sspipe Module with Core Python
Juan Telleria added the comment: Even if it is not currently mainstream, piping (tidy and readable code, left to right), should be a foundation, not just a module. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue38052> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue38052] Include sspipe Module with Core Python
Juan Telleria added the comment: And based on previous example, a more "pythonic" syntax would: MyObj = Class \ .method1() \ .f_function1() \ .method2() \ .f_function2(param1 = "A", param2 = .) So that any function preceded by a dot "." becomes a forward-pipe function (Object reference is passed forward). -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue38052> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
