Dan Thomasset added the comment:
Ahh, my mistake then. I misunderstood what was going on.
Thanks,
Dan
On 9/4/07, Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
>
> Why do you think so? The documentation is correct as it stands;
> dummy_threading should be used when thread is not present, not when
> threading is not present (as threading will always be present, it just
> won't import when thread is not present).
>
> --
> nosy: +loewis
> resolution: -> invalid
> status: open -> closed
>
> __
> Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1103>
> __
>
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1103>
__Ahh, my mistake then. I misunderstood what was going
on.Thanks, DanOn
9/4/07, Martin v. Löwis <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Martin v. Löwis added the comment:Why do you
think so? The documentation is correct as it stands;
dummy_threading should be used when thread is not present, not
whenthreading is not present (as threading will always be present, it
justwon't import when thread is not
present).--nosy: +loewis
resolution: -> invalidstatus: open ->
closed__Tracker <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]><http://bugs.python.org/issue1103";>
http://bugs.python.org/issue1103>__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com