[issue41933] Wording of s * n in Common Sequence Operations is not optimal

2020-10-05 Thread Chavdar Yotov


Chavdar Yotov  added the comment:

Looks like a fitting first contribution. Working on a PR now :-)

--
nosy: +chavdar

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41933>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41933] Wording of s * n in Common Sequence Operations is not optimal

2020-10-05 Thread Chavdar Yotov


Change by Chavdar Yotov :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +21566
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22570

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41933>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com