[Bug 273132] lang/python38: backport netlink support

2023-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273132

Mina Galić  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #244093|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #2 from Mina Galić  ---
Created attachment 245287
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=245287&action=edit
lang/python38: backport netlink patch

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 273106] lang/python39: backport netlink support

2023-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273106

Mina Galić  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #244055|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #5 from Mina Galić  ---
Created attachment 245288
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=245288&action=edit
lang/python39: backport netlink support

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 273114] lang/python310: backport netlink support

2023-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273114

Mina Galić  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #244066|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #3 from Mina Galić  ---
Created attachment 245291
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=245291&action=edit
lang/python310: backport netlink support

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


[Bug 273122] lang/python311: backport netlink support

2023-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273122

Mina Galić  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #244076|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #16 from Mina Galić  ---
Created attachment 245298
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=245298&action=edit
lang/python311: backport netlink support

- implement patch as single file.
- patch configure.ac instead of configure (as per Handbook)
- add USES= autoreconf:2.69
- get rid of old patch-configure for LTO
- implement it as patch-configure.ac, lest it be overwritten

That last part could be done as REINPLACE_CMD, but for now I find it easier to
have all patches … as patches.

The LTO stuff should be fixed by making use of the previously detected
cc_is_clang and pushed then upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.