FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

[portscout]

Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/pyt...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
devel/py-pip| 22.1.2  | 22.2
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Reported by:portscout!

[Bug 265368] [New Port] benchmarks/uica: uops.info Code Analyzer

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265368

Bug ID: 265368
   Summary: [New Port] benchmarks/uica: uops.info Code Analyzer
   Product: Ports & Packages
   Version: Latest
  Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
  Severity: Affects Only Me
  Priority: ---
 Component: Individual Port(s)
  Assignee: ports-b...@freebsd.org
  Reporter: f...@fuz.su
CC: python@FreeBSD.org
 Attachment #235413 maintainer-approval+
 Flags:

Created attachment 235413
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=235413&action=edit
[New Port] benchmarks/uica: uops.info Code Analyzer

uiCA is a simulator that can predict the throughput of basic blocks on
recent Intel microarchitectures. In addition to that, it also provides
insights into how the code is executed.

uiCA is based on data from uops.info, combined with a detailed pipeline
model. Like related tools, it assumes that all memory accesses result in
cache hits.

WWW: https://uops.info/uiCA.html

Tested with Poudriere on armv7 arm64 i386 amd64 FreeBSD 13.1.
Portclippy likes the port.
Portlint has two issues:

 - it doesn't like the PORTVERSION, I think that's a bug (cf. bug #265364)
 - it doesn't like COMMENT= uops.info Code Analyzer

For the latter, the comment could be changed if needed, but as is, it's pretty
much exactly what the software is.  uops.info is a domain name and should be
rendered in lower case letters.  Perhaps an exception to the guidelines can be
made here.

On another note, this port is a Python port and doesn't come with distutils or
the like.  I have tried to get the packaging right, but alas I'm not a Python
expert and may have made some sort of terrible mistake.  Please may someone
with more experience check this one.

The special treatment of the xml distfile is due to upstream naming the most
recent version "instructions.xml".  When a new version comes out, the current
version is moved to a dated file name.  I try to work around this by trying
both, banking on distinfo to reject the undated file if it has changed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.