[Bug 262079] multimedia/py-soco: Update to 0.26.3
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262079
Conall O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #231974||maintainer-approval+
Flags||
--- Comment #3 from Conall O'Brien ---
Comment on attachment 231974
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=231974
git generated patch file
--- a/multimedia/py-soco/Makefile
+++ b/multimedia/py-soco/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
PORTNAME= soco
-PORTVERSION= 0.26.0
+PORTVERSION= 0.26.3
DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v
CATEGORIES=multimedia python
PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}
diff --git a/multimedia/py-soco/distinfo b/multimedia/py-soco/distinfo
index 431ba9e0a189..14bd07f3292e 100644
--- a/multimedia/py-soco/distinfo
+++ b/multimedia/py-soco/distinfo
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-TIMESTAMP = 1643377491
-SHA256 (SoCo-SoCo-v0.26.0_GH0.tar.gz) =
754e23c1cbaa1ab6bac3198a2952af31a27695dabb778c7d1c29c71c430c5f54
-SIZE (SoCo-SoCo-v0.26.0_GH0.tar.gz) = 713811
+TIMESTAMP = 1645398369
+SHA256 (SoCo-SoCo-v0.26.3_GH0.tar.gz) =
e51c5f19967126dbda18e4ae46460821f44ba890676b70e73cb55b1dc589e0ef
+SIZE (SoCo-SoCo-v0.26.3_GH0.tar.gz) = 713952
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 262079] multimedia/py-soco: Update to 0.26.3
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262079 --- Comment #4 from Conall O'Brien --- Updated the patch, something had happened to my local git client. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 262079] multimedia/py-soco: Update to 0.26.3
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262079 Conall O'Brien changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|maintainer-feedback?(conall |maintainer-feedback+ |@conall.net)| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 261415] multimedia/onevpl: wrong python version used if newer python (than default) is installed ('make install' fails)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261415 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu ||gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2621 ||09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 262109] Mk/Uses/python.mk: coddle cmake with more hints
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262109 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-qa Status|New |Open See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu ||gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2614 ||15 --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak --- Thank you for the report and patch John. Are you aware of a cmake mechanism where one can pass an explicit Python version/path using a single variable, without requiring the MAJOR_VER checks? I haven't had the opportunity to review the cmake/python ecosystem for best current practice lately. We'd appreciate any insight in that regard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 262109] Mk/Uses/python.mk: Improve CMake/Python integration
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262109 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Mk/Uses/python.mk: coddle |Mk/Uses/python.mk: Improve |cmake with more hints |CMake/Python integration -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 259599] devel/py-buildbot: Fails to run after sqlalchemy 1.4 update: AttributeError: module 'sqlalchemy.engine.strategies' has no attribute 'PlainEngineStrategy'
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259599 --- Comment #21 from a...@ish.com.au --- *** Bug 260164 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 259599] devel/py-buildbot: Fails to run after sqlalchemy 1.4 update: AttributeError: module 'sqlalchemy.engine.strategies' has no attribute 'PlainEngineStrategy'
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259599 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|maintainer-feedback?(sunpoe |merge-quarterly? |t...@freebsd.org) | Assignee|sunp...@freebsd.org |ko...@freebsd.org --- Comment #22 from Kubilay Kocak --- Tomoyuki, thank you for the well commented/test patch, was hoping sunpoet could take care of the regression, but it may have fell of the radar. Will try to get this committed/merged as soon as possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 261974] lang/python311: Enable Link Time Optimization (via autoconf)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261974 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|lang/python311: add |lang/python311: Enable Link |--enable-lto|Time Optimization (via ||autoconf) Keywords||needs-patch, needs-qa --- Comment #5 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #4) Sounds reasonable. Could we: - Wrap this in an LTO option, enabled by default, excluded on architectures its not relevent or ok for. - Update the patch to include changes for all lang/python* ports that support it (LTO). I think more than one does. - Can we get away without the 'CC= environment override', leaving in either: 1) the current check for == cc, or 2) using appropriate ports framework mechanisms to determine whether the compiler is clang? ie: if excluding options based on arch is feasible: if option and correct-compiler If not: if option and correct compiler and not bad-arch Note that while pythons configure checks CC, it also incorrectly detects 'GNU linker' (based on version string), and the build system is not very robust with respect to toolchains, and if we can just do the 'is this the right toolchain for lto' parts in ports, that would be preferable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 262128] devel/py-oci: Update to 2.58.0
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262128 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open Summary|devel/py-oci: update to |devel/py-oci: Update to |2.58.0 version |2.58.0 Keywords||needs-qa CC||python@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 257041] [NEW PORT] devel/py-lief: Parse, modify and abstract ELF, PE and MachO formats
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257041 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||maintainer-feedback?(ports@ ||nicandneal.net) Keywords||needs-patch Summary|[NEW PORT]: devel/py-lief: |[NEW PORT] devel/py-lief: |Parse, modify and abstract |Parse, modify and abstract |ELF, PE and MachO formats |ELF, PE and MachO formats --- Comment #15 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Neal Nelson from comment #14) Just mentioned it for the record and future reference. I personally lean toward action unless it sets us backward, and as long as the remaining issues are tracked (and dont fall into a blackhole and forgotten). Clarity on potential paths to unbundle would remain useful, and in the meantime, it would be great to get this port using autoplist given Fukangs isolation, and patch suggestion in comment 6, QA confirmed (once more), such that it can be landed. I'm happy to review that given a QA pass -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 254851] [NEW PORT] devel/py-setuptools-rust: Plugin for setuptools to build Rust Python extensions
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254851 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeroen.pul...@gmail.com, ||python@FreeBSD.org Flags||maintainer-feedback?(jeroen ||.pul...@gmail.com) --- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak --- Given the size and complexity of the rust stack, it'd be great to get QA (needs-qa) confirmation (with poudriere) across all tier archs and supported freebsd versions. Anyone can do this, though maintainer preferred (so they're across it), and if anyone needs help: #freebsd-ports on Libera IRC or #ports on Discord and we can help you get poudriere running if you dont have it up already. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.
