[Puppet Users] Re: SSL issues when testing - This is how to fix
Gabriel, I am running into similar problems in configuring a single client, single server puppet setup. > I’ve been suffering all week to fix all manner of SSL issues on my test > setup, not realizing that it was my puppet master where I had made a mistake. > I’ve spoken to people in the IRC room for long enough to know that a lot of > people have this problem, so I’ve come up with a quick and dirty hack, that > has FIXED all 4 test setups I built. If you getting that dreaded hostname not > matching SSL certificate or other, and your puppet server IS NOT a production > server then you go do what I did ☺ > > • Okay, first nuke both SSL directories, on puppetmaster and client, I did > #] mv ssl sslbackup > • Make sure puppet is NOT running on the client > • Make sure that the puppet master hostname is what you expect it to be, > (google change linux hostname, to be SURE) > • Add an entry to puppet client host file, to force it to go to the right > server – Or you can update your DNS and wait for it to propagate > • On client: #] puppetd --waitforcert 60 --test --server host.domainname.com, > • On server: #] puppetca –list > • On the server you should see -- puppetclient.domain.com This is where I run into problems. puppetca --list always returns empty. I have tried a number of different things (restart the puppetmaster), remove/reinstall puppetmaster/puppet on client/server. I don't have a firewall running and my /etc/hosts files are setup correctly as far as I can tell. What should I try next? Cheers, Brian > • On server #] puppetca –sign puppetclient.domain.com > > At this point your puppetclient should ‘give in’ and for ever be linked with > your puppet master to do it’s bidding when called upon! Don’t forget to > restart puppet on the client > > If anyone has anything to add, or if I got this completely wrong, feel free > to flame the crap out of me, at least we all learn together – and I was > actually able to make a contribution pretty quick in my puppet career ☺ Have > a good weekend! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] LF complete recipe bundle
Along this line, I think it would be super useful (for folks new to puppet) to have a vmware type image of a working puppet system that could be fired up in a player and whose configuration and classes/modules were integrated with the documentation. - Jeff On 04/29/2010 12:23 PM, Alan McKay wrote: Hey folks, I've seen the recipes page and smatterings of "this-and-that", but what I'd really like to see is a big tarball of someone's entire /etc/puppet directory on their puppetmaster, to be able to see the interactions between all the different components. What would be really useful is seeing this for a small, medium, and large config. Is there anyone willing to release that, or is there too much proprietary info in there? thanks, -Alan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Watchers replaces voting...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all Thanks to Eric Davis we can now sort issues by the number of people watching them. This should make it easier to determine who wants what and how many people want it. Up until now this was provided via the voting plug-in. We're going to replace this plug-in with this approach. If you are interested in a ticket or feature and want to ensure your interest is registered then please start watching the ticket. We won't remove the Votes plug-in for a while to allow us to transition from it! To do this click the Watch link at the top of a particular issue. Thanks James Turnbull - -- Author of: * Pro Linux System Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEVAwUBS9ze5iFa/lDkFHAyAQJiCggAk7yneCdqa6S1Jb+NEEQwPK2Bt4sUM1Hn dLRnhtCW80/iqU8N8Hr0+MXYBXURn3yEYZcfVUwh7SbvztyV1Iv8zmO5T20LvDov d7pe9pDeRJR6AaZjT8otaIGg2VRnEI5IJ92oLHrmNCe7l69QL2opVYrgt72cPCWr 7/4cmjWdGia761q9WAhMPPeAEmqYYDSDcZXIi+QGjUs4w9WWznUIkAoDXY9Egdx9 YEuNKMQJeNd1jeXqe83qX9oPrj7AcftzKsX0FTcKR3pAUyJttRLLuhVSMXU+iN9A eT16X5Y/NZeTZ/JDf0EUG+N50nQzO85SnJH3xd3ALMGWk+QUztYqrw== =ltSt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Watchers replaces voting...
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 7:09 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all > > Thanks to Eric Davis we can now sort issues by the number of people > watching them. This should make it easier to determine who wants > what and how many people want it. > huzzah! > > Up until now this was provided via the voting plug-in. We're going > to replace this plug-in with this approach. If you are interested > in a ticket or feature and want to ensure your interest is > registered then please start watching the ticket. > > We won't remove the Votes plug-in for a while to allow us to > transition from it! > > To do this click the Watch link at the top of a particular issue. > > Thanks > > James Turnbull > > - -- > Author of: > * Pro Linux System Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) > * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) > * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) > * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux) > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQEVAwUBS9ze5iFa/lDkFHAyAQJiCggAk7yneCdqa6S1Jb+NEEQwPK2Bt4sUM1Hn > dLRnhtCW80/iqU8N8Hr0+MXYBXURn3yEYZcfVUwh7SbvztyV1Iv8zmO5T20LvDov > d7pe9pDeRJR6AaZjT8otaIGg2VRnEI5IJ92oLHrmNCe7l69QL2opVYrgt72cPCWr > 7/4cmjWdGia761q9WAhMPPeAEmqYYDSDcZXIi+QGjUs4w9WWznUIkAoDXY9Egdx9 > YEuNKMQJeNd1jeXqe83qX9oPrj7AcftzKsX0FTcKR3pAUyJttRLLuhVSMXU+iN9A > eT16X5Y/NZeTZ/JDf0EUG+N50nQzO85SnJH3xd3ALMGWk+QUztYqrw== > =ltSt > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] status of cpan provider?
Something to keep in mind is that if you are making your own package repo for Perl RPMS (or any other type of package), you may want to try to get them upstream in a repo. It's not very difficult to become a Fedora/EPEL maintainer. I would assume Debian has methods to manage packages that also include a fairly low barrier to entry. Part of the drive of the puppet project is to provide re-usable infrastructure. An easy way to do that is get packages we all create into operating system packages repositories, pending good licenses and such of course. That way we can all benefit from these packages. I know that I have put over 25 packages into EPEL simply because I needed them at my day job, and decided if I had to maintain the package once, I may as well do that for everyone else. I am certainly not saying there shouldn't be a CPAN provider. But I really prefer OS packages. stahnma -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Puppet and systemimager
Hi, I've written a small tutorial on how to deploy images for puppet using systemimager. Please check it out: http://linuxdatacenter.blogspot.com/2010/05/systemimager-puppet.html -Linuxdatacenter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
