[Puppet Users] external nodes issue
Hi all,
I've hit a wall trying to get external nodes working on our production
puppet master. I'm using the foreman to supply the external nodes
information and have it all working in the dev environment.
I've started all processes in debug - running Puppet 0.25
puppetd -
debug: Puppet::Network::Format[json]: false value when expecting true
err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on
SERVER: Could not find default node or by name with 'sl01.domain.sl,
sl01.domain, sl01' on node sl01.domain.sl
warning: Not using cache on failed catalog
err: Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
puppetmasterd -
info: Not using expired node for sl01.domain.sl from cache; expired at
Mon Sep 28 09:28:47 +0100 2009
debug: Executing '/etc/puppet/node.rb sl01.domain.sl'
info: Caching node for sl01.domain.sl
err: Could not find default node or by name with 'sl01.domain.sl,
sl01.domain, sl01' on node sl01.domain.sl
err: Could not find default node or by name with 'sl01.domain.sl,
sl01.domain, sl01' on node sl01.domain.sl
foreman -
Processing HostsController#externalNodes (for 127.0.0.1 at 2009-09-28
09:39:30) [GET]
Parameters: {"fqdn"=>"sl01.domain.sl", "action"=>"externalNodes",
"controller"=>"hosts"}
Completed in 9ms (View: 0, DB: 1) | 200 OK
[http://localhost/hosts/externalNodes?fqdn=sl01.domain.sl]
manually -
# su - puppet
-bash-3.2$ cd /etc/puppet
-bash-3.2$ ./node.rb sl01.domain.sl
---
parameters:
s3: "false"
puppetmaster: sl02.domain.sl
java: jre16007
domainname: domain.sl
classes:
- env
- ganglia
Anyone have any idea how I can find out whats going on?
The only difference I can see between the production and dev boxes is
that the production box uses certdnsnames, as it has both external and
internal clients -
certname=sl02.domain.com
certdnsnames=sl02.domain.com:sl02.domain.sl
Thanks,
Matt
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: external nodes issue
Update:-
I added a default node to a manifest file, just -
node default {
include env
}
This appears to have made the puppetmasterd kick in to action and
compile the catalog from the foreman for that node. i.e. I see
puppetmasterd compile all the correct classes for the node and not
just the default one.
notice: Compiled catalog for sl01.domain.sl in 0.14 seconds
But the client is still giving -
warning: Not using cache on failed catalog
err: Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
2009/9/28 Matt :
> Hi all,
>
> I've hit a wall trying to get external nodes working on our production
> puppet master. I'm using the foreman to supply the external nodes
> information and have it all working in the dev environment.
>
> I've started all processes in debug - running Puppet 0.25
>
> puppetd -
> debug: Puppet::Network::Format[json]: false value when expecting true
> err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on
> SERVER: Could not find default node or by name with 'sl01.domain.sl,
> sl01.domain, sl01' on node sl01.domain.sl
> warning: Not using cache on failed catalog
> err: Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
>
> puppetmasterd -
> info: Not using expired node for sl01.domain.sl from cache; expired at
> Mon Sep 28 09:28:47 +0100 2009
> debug: Executing '/etc/puppet/node.rb sl01.domain.sl'
> info: Caching node for sl01.domain.sl
>
> err: Could not find default node or by name with 'sl01.domain.sl,
> sl01.domain, sl01' on node sl01.domain.sl
> err: Could not find default node or by name with 'sl01.domain.sl,
> sl01.domain, sl01' on node sl01.domain.sl
>
> foreman -
> Processing HostsController#externalNodes (for 127.0.0.1 at 2009-09-28
> 09:39:30) [GET]
> Parameters: {"fqdn"=>"sl01.domain.sl", "action"=>"externalNodes",
> "controller"=>"hosts"}
> Completed in 9ms (View: 0, DB: 1) | 200 OK
> [http://localhost/hosts/externalNodes?fqdn=sl01.domain.sl]
>
> manually -
> # su - puppet
> -bash-3.2$ cd /etc/puppet
> -bash-3.2$ ./node.rb sl01.domain.sl
> ---
> parameters:
> s3: "false"
> puppetmaster: sl02.domain.sl
> java: jre16007
> domainname: domain.sl
> classes:
> - env
> - ganglia
>
>
> Anyone have any idea how I can find out whats going on?
>
> The only difference I can see between the production and dev boxes is
> that the production box uses certdnsnames, as it has both external and
> internal clients -
> certname=sl02.domain.com
> certdnsnames=sl02.domain.com:sl02.domain.sl
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: external nodes issue
Le lundi 28 septembre 2009 à 10:52 +0100, Matt a écrit :
> Update:-
>
> I added a default node to a manifest file, just -
>
> node default {
> include env
> }
>
> This appears to have made the puppetmasterd kick in to action and
> compile the catalog from the foreman for that node. i.e. I see
> puppetmasterd compile all the correct classes for the node and not
> just the default one.
>
> notice: Compiled catalog for sl01.domain.sl in 0.14 seconds
>
> But the client is still giving -
> warning: Not using cache on failed catalog
> err: Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
Looks like your YAML is invalid
> > manually -
> > # su - puppet
> > -bash-3.2$ cd /etc/puppet
> > -bash-3.2$ ./node.rb sl01.domain.sl
> > ---
> > parameters:
> > s3: "false"
> > puppetmaster: sl02.domain.sl
> > java: jre16007
> > domainname: domain.sl
> > classes:
> > - env
> > - ganglia
> >
./scripts/ext_node.rb fluor.XXX
---
classes:
- mount::webserver::pool
- webserver::pool
- webserver::zend
- common
parameters:
wwwpool: pool1
Nico.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
[Puppet Users] Re: external nodes issue
You're right, I removed all /var/lib/puppet/* from the client except
the ssl directory and the next poll worked.
Still requires me to have a default node though on the puppetmaster.
Should the client really cache bad catalogs?
2009/9/28 Nicolas Szalay :
> Le lundi 28 septembre 2009 à 10:52 +0100, Matt a écrit :
>> Update:-
>>
>> I added a default node to a manifest file, just -
>>
>> node default {
>> include env
>> }
>>
>> This appears to have made the puppetmasterd kick in to action and
>> compile the catalog from the foreman for that node. i.e. I see
>> puppetmasterd compile all the correct classes for the node and not
>> just the default one.
>>
>> notice: Compiled catalog for sl01.domain.sl in 0.14 seconds
>>
>> But the client is still giving -
>> warning: Not using cache on failed catalog
>> err: Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
>
>
> Looks like your YAML is invalid
>
>> > manually -
>> > # su - puppet
>> > -bash-3.2$ cd /etc/puppet
>> > -bash-3.2$ ./node.rb sl01.domain.sl
>> > ---
>> > parameters:
>> > s3: "false"
>> > puppetmaster: sl02.domain.sl
>> > java: jre16007
>> > domainname: domain.sl
>> > classes:
>> > - env
>> > - ganglia
>> >
>
> ./scripts/ext_node.rb fluor.XXX
> ---
> classes:
> - mount::webserver::pool
> - webserver::pool
> - webserver::zend
> - common
> parameters:
> wwwpool: pool1
>
> Nico.
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: How long does the server's node cache stick around?
I tried the ignorecache=true on the clients to no avail... the server would still send the cached node entry. I could watch the output and it even reported "using cached node blah blah" instead of "Compiling node blah blah". I'm beginning to wonder if it's an LDAP issue... From what I gather of old user list postings, the server should detect config file changes and automatically recompile. On Sep 28, 12:56 am, Chris Blumentritt wrote: > I don't know the answer to how long the cache hangs around or how to modify > how long it will use the cache but I know that if you run puppet with the > --test option it forces puppet to ignore the cache which is a lot less > annoying then editing the yaml file. I suppose in the puppet.conf for your > clients you could put ignorecache = true and it will always compile the > manifest for you. > Chris > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Tony Maro wrote: > > > In my testing, puppet has never caught on to a new config or recipe to > > distribute unless I manually delete the node entry from the yaml/nodes > > directory. I couldn't find any documentation on how to clear the > > cache properly (I stumbled on that method) and I couldn't find any > > documentation on how long the cache is kept before it recompiles. All > > I saw were references to "stale timestamps" but no real details. I've > > waited as long as two days and it just doesn't see the change. > > > If one day I decide I need to deploy a new required Gnome key to all > > of my Linux desktops, what's the poper method of making sure that the > > server realizes all the nodes need to be recompiled? > > > I'm using LDAP for storing my node entries, if this makes a > > difference. All of my LDAP servers are doing live replication. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: How long does the server's node cache stick around?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Tony Maro wrote: > > I tried the ignorecache=true on the clients to no avail... the server > would still send the cached node entry. I could watch the output and > it even reported "using cached node blah blah" instead of "Compiling > node blah blah". > > I'm beginning to wonder if it's an LDAP issue... From what I gather of > old user list postings, the server should detect config file changes > and automatically recompile. ignorecache should only apply to the client-side cache, not the server. I don't use LDAP nodes, and I never have this issue btw. > > On Sep 28, 12:56 am, Chris Blumentritt wrote: >> I don't know the answer to how long the cache hangs around or how to modify >> how long it will use the cache but I know that if you run puppet with the >> --test option it forces puppet to ignore the cache which is a lot less >> annoying then editing the yaml file. I suppose in the puppet.conf for your >> clients you could put ignorecache = true and it will always compile the >> manifest for you. >> Chris >> >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Tony Maro wrote: >> >> > In my testing, puppet has never caught on to a new config or recipe to >> > distribute unless I manually delete the node entry from the yaml/nodes >> > directory. I couldn't find any documentation on how to clear the >> > cache properly (I stumbled on that method) and I couldn't find any >> > documentation on how long the cache is kept before it recompiles. All >> > I saw were references to "stale timestamps" but no real details. I've >> > waited as long as two days and it just doesn't see the change. >> >> > If one day I decide I need to deploy a new required Gnome key to all >> > of my Linux desktops, what's the poper method of making sure that the >> > server realizes all the nodes need to be recompiled? >> >> > I'm using LDAP for storing my node entries, if this makes a >> > difference. All of my LDAP servers are doing live replication. > > > -- nigel --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Passing input to script within an exec statement fails
Hi, >From the command line I can successfully perform this:- echo y | /mnt/Linux/install.sh Trying the same thing from an exec, though, fails and I'm not too sure how to get round it command => "(echo y | /mnt/Linux/install.sh)", err: //Node[host]/vm_post_install/Exec[install-xenserver-tools]/returns: change from notrun to 0 failed: (echo y | /mnt/Linux/install.sh) returned 1 instead of 0 at /etc/puppet/modules/vm_post_install/manifests/init.pp:30 I've tried without the brackets as well - same result Unfortunately, in this case the option does not exist to avoid the script (as I'm mounting an iso and running the package's install script) Thanks Paul -- Paul Matthews -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] push a directory of files as part of a manifest?
Hi All, I get the feeling I'm being really dumb here but hey, if you don't ask... ;) I'm setting up a puppet install for about 80 or so servers and taking a "softly softly" approach by starting with Syslog-ng and stunnel configs. I want to push out a directory of files to /etc/stunnel that includes the config and pems for each client. Is it posible to push an entire directory, or do I have to specify each file (as I'm currently doing in my dev environment!)? Thanks in advance, M. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: push a directory of files as part of a manifest?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:50 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote: > > Hi All, > > I get the feeling I'm being really dumb here but hey, if you don't ask... ;) > > I'm setting up a puppet install for about 80 or so servers and taking a > "softly softly" approach by starting with Syslog-ng and stunnel configs. > > I want to push out a directory of files to /etc/stunnel that includes > the config and pems for each client. Is it posible to push an entire > directory, or do I have to specify each file (as I'm currently doing in > my dev environment!)? http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/TypeReference#file Have a look at the "recurse" attribute. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: push a directory of files as part of a manifest?
Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:50 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I get the feeling I'm being really dumb here but hey, if you don't ask... ;)
>>
>> I'm setting up a puppet install for about 80 or so servers and taking a
>> "softly softly" approach by starting with Syslog-ng and stunnel configs.
>>
>> I want to push out a directory of files to /etc/stunnel that includes
>> the config and pems for each client. Is it posible to push an entire
>> directory, or do I have to specify each file (as I'm currently doing in
>> my dev environment!)?
>
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/TypeReference#file
>
> Have a look at the "recurse" attribute.
I knew it had to be possible!
So if I set the manifest as follows:
file{ "/path/to/dir":
source=>"/path/to/source/dir"
recurse=>true
...
}
then it should work?
Thanks,
M.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Capistrano roles filled in using puppet's stored config db
Hello puppeteers, if anyone is interested I have figured how to fill in
capistrano roles via the stored config db. I have the following script
served out to my puppetmasters via puppet (gethosts.rb):
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
require "puppet"
ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection(
:adapter => 'mysql',
:database => 'puppet',
:host => 'localhost',
:password => 'puppet',
:username => 'puppet'
)
class Hosts < Puppet::Rails::Host; end
puts Hosts.find(:all,
:include=> [ :fact_values, :fact_names ],
:conditions => [ "fact_names.name = ?
and fact_values.value = ?",
"operatingsystem",
"ubuntu"
]
).map { |host| host.name }
This lists, line by line, my ubuntu boxes. In a Capfile I have:
role :puppet_masters,
"puppet.whatever.com"
role :ubuntu do end
task :enum, :roles => [:puppet_masters] do
desc "Enumerate hosts from puppet DB"
hosts = Hash.new
logger.info "Hosts:"
run '/usr/local/bin/gethosts.rb', :pty => true do |ch, stream, out|
next if out.chomp == ''
logger.info out.sub(/\//,' ')
out.split("\r\n").each do |host|
role(:ubuntu, host)
end
end
end
enum
Later on I can do something like
task :aptup_all, :roles => [ :ubuntu ]
run "sudo apt-get update -y && sudo apt-get upgrade -y"
end
Of course this is pretty rudimentary, but I plan on extending my Capfile
to do a lot more tasks.
--
Joe McDonagh
Operations Engineer
www.colonfail.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: push a directory of files as part of a manifest?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:57 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk
wrote:
>
> Nigel Kersten wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:50 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk
>> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I get the feeling I'm being really dumb here but hey, if you don't ask... ;)
>>>
>>> I'm setting up a puppet install for about 80 or so servers and taking a
>>> "softly softly" approach by starting with Syslog-ng and stunnel configs.
>>>
>>> I want to push out a directory of files to /etc/stunnel that includes
>>> the config and pems for each client. Is it posible to push an entire
>>> directory, or do I have to specify each file (as I'm currently doing in
>>> my dev environment!)?
>>
>> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/TypeReference#file
>>
>> Have a look at the "recurse" attribute.
>
> I knew it had to be possible!
>
> So if I set the manifest as follows:
>
> file{ "/path/to/dir":
> source=>"/path/to/source/dir"
> recurse=>true
> ...
> }
>
> then it should work?
Yep. Note that if you want to get rid of files in that location that
aren't in the source, you'll need to add purge => true.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> >
>
--
nigel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: How long does the server's node cache stick around?
I do have this issue. Any time I add a new node, I have to restart the puppet master. On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Tony Maro wrote: >> >> I tried the ignorecache=true on the clients to no avail... the server >> would still send the cached node entry. I could watch the output and >> it even reported "using cached node blah blah" instead of "Compiling >> node blah blah". >> >> I'm beginning to wonder if it's an LDAP issue... From what I gather of >> old user list postings, the server should detect config file changes >> and automatically recompile. > > ignorecache should only apply to the client-side cache, not the server. > > I don't use LDAP nodes, and I never have this issue btw. > >> >> On Sep 28, 12:56 am, Chris Blumentritt wrote: >>> I don't know the answer to how long the cache hangs around or how to modify >>> how long it will use the cache but I know that if you run puppet with the >>> --test option it forces puppet to ignore the cache which is a lot less >>> annoying then editing the yaml file. I suppose in the puppet.conf for your >>> clients you could put ignorecache = true and it will always compile the >>> manifest for you. >>> Chris >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Tony Maro wrote: >>> >>> > In my testing, puppet has never caught on to a new config or recipe to >>> > distribute unless I manually delete the node entry from the yaml/nodes >>> > directory. I couldn't find any documentation on how to clear the >>> > cache properly (I stumbled on that method) and I couldn't find any >>> > documentation on how long the cache is kept before it recompiles. All >>> > I saw were references to "stale timestamps" but no real details. I've >>> > waited as long as two days and it just doesn't see the change. >>> >>> > If one day I decide I need to deploy a new required Gnome key to all >>> > of my Linux desktops, what's the poper method of making sure that the >>> > server realizes all the nodes need to be recompiled? >>> >>> > I'm using LDAP for storing my node entries, if this makes a >>> > difference. All of my LDAP servers are doing live replication. >> > >> > > > > -- > nigel > > > > -- Chad M. Huneycutt --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: authentication issue with passenger
yes, I have all those settings. Attached are the relevant files. To sum up: Everything works fine with webrick Nothing I do can make server 0.25.1 w/passenger work with a 0.24.8 client Only way I can get server 0.25.1 w/passenger to work with a 0.25.1 client is to have a a wide open auth.conf file path / auth any allow * Thanks for your help. --- Thanks, Allan Marcus 505-667-5666 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- client_248.log Description: Binary data client_251.log Description: Binary data puppet.conf Description: Binary data server.log Description: Binary data On Sep 26, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > > Also: please check that you have the required settings in the masters > puppet.conf as mentioned in > http://github.com/reductivelabs/puppet/blob/master/ext/rack/README > > If it still doesn't work, please post a full log from master + server > for a single client run. > > Christian > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >
[Puppet Users] Re: Passing input to script within an exec statement fails
You could try to add path=> "/bin:/usr/bin", for the echo command. --- Thanks, Allan Marcus 505-667-5666 On Sep 28, 2009, at 8:46 AM, paul matthews wrote: > Hi, > > From the command line I can successfully perform this:- > > echo y | /mnt/Linux/install.sh > > Trying the same thing from an exec, though, fails and I'm not too > sure how to get round it > > command => "(echo y | /mnt/Linux/install.sh)", > > err: //Node[host]/vm_post_install/Exec[install-xenserver-tools]/ > returns: change from notrun to 0 failed: (echo y | /mnt/Linux/ > install.sh) returned 1 instead of 0 at /etc/puppet/modules/ > vm_post_install/manifests/init.pp:30 > > I've tried without the brackets as well - same result > > Unfortunately, in this case the option does not exist to avoid the > script (as I'm mounting an iso and running the package's install > script) > > Thanks > Paul > > > -- > Paul Matthews > -- > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: authentication issue with passenger (resolved)
I think I have it working now. --- Thanks, Allan Marcus 505-667-5666 On Sep 28, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Allan Marcus wrote: > yes, I have all those settings. Attached are the relevant files. > > To sum up: > > Everything works fine with webrick > Nothing I do can make server 0.25.1 w/passenger work with a 0.24.8 > client > Only way I can get server 0.25.1 w/passenger to work with a 0.25.1 > client is to have a a wide open auth.conf file > > path / > auth any > allow * > > Thanks for your help. > > --- > Thanks, > > Allan Marcus > 505-667-5666 > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > >> >> Also: please check that you have the required settings in the masters >> puppet.conf as mentioned in >> http://github.com/reductivelabs/puppet/blob/master/ext/rack/README >> >> If it still doesn't work, please post a full log from master + server >> for a single client run. >> >> Christian >> --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Puppet Users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en >> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >> > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: Using variables in virtual resources
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:08:37AM +0200, Kenneth Holter wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> I've defined a virtual user "kenneth", and depending on a variable in the
> node definiton I'd like to add the users to different groups. Consider this
> example:
>
> ## Code start
>
> node "server.example.com" {
>$server_type = "typeA"
>
>realize User[kenneth]
>
> }
>
> @user {"kenneth":
> ensure => present,
> uid => 1000,
> gid => 1000,
> groups => $server_type ? {
>typeA => "wheel",
>default => undef,
> },
>
> home => "/home/kenneth",
> shell => "/bin/bash",
> comment => "A comment",
> password => ''
>
> }
>
> ## Code end
>
> If I add the user to an ordinary class (like "class user_kenneth") instead
> of defining it as a virtual resource, everything works fine. But when using
> a virtual definition like this, the variable "server_type" doesn't seem to
> have any effect on the if statement "groups". Am I doing something wrong, or
> is this not supposed to work? I'm running version 0.24.4.
I've been off for over a week, so I just noticed you never got an answer to
this question. The variables are filled out at the time the virtual resource
is defined, not at the time it's realized.
You might be able to do something like:
realize User[kenneth]
User[kenneth] {
groups => $server_type ? {
typeA => "wheel",
default => undef,
}
}
to realize it the way you want. Haven't tried anything like that though.
Maybe someone else can comment if it works.
Cheers,
--
Eric Gerlach, Network Administrator
Federation of Students
University of Waterloo
p: (519) 888-4567 x36329
e: egerl...@feds.uwaterloo.ca
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: external nodes issue
Matt schrieb: > Hi all, > > I've hit a wall trying to get external nodes working on our production > puppet master. I'm using the foreman to supply the external nodes > information and have it all working in the dev environment. > > manually - > # su - puppet > -bash-3.2$ cd /etc/puppet > -bash-3.2$ ./node.rb sl01.domain.sl > --- > parameters: > s3: "false" > puppetmaster: sl02.domain.sl > java: jre16007 > domainname: domain.sl > classes: > - env > - ganglia Maybe it is just a typo in this mail, but the classes (env and ganglia) should be indented to be a valid yaml list as value for the classes key. regards Christian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Puppet Users] puppet / works & does not work: the quantum effect
Good morning dear puppet users, if you experience "it works - it does not work" situations with puppet like I do, here may be the reason for it: http://www.nico.schottelius.org/blog/puppet-sometimes-loads-a-class/ I was told that this behaviour is "correct" on IRC, but I don't agree with it: a configuration should either work or not, not both. What's your point of view? Is my approach not the way puppet users/devs think or do you also see this as a bug? Sincerly, Nico -- Currently moving *.schottelius.org to http://www.nico.schottelius.org/ ... PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42 F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[Puppet Users] lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
If you're interested in coming along for lunch at Google on Wednesday before Puppet Camp, let me know and I'll see if we can handle the load :) -- nigel --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
I'd definitely be interested in going but I don't get in to SF till 11:00am. According to GMaps, the earliest I could get the Google Campus is at 2:00pm by bus. Anyone have any suggestions? On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > If you're interested in coming along for lunch at Google on Wednesday > before Puppet Camp, let me know and I'll see if we can handle the load > :) > > > > -- > nigel > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nigel Kersten wrote: > If you're interested in coming along for lunch at Google on Wednesday > before Puppet Camp, let me know and I'll see if we can handle the load > :) I am going to be hackfesting and talking the ears off whomever shows up there. Cheers James Turnbull - -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEVAwUBSsEDHyFa/lDkFHAyAQL+AQf+PiIRMgY9vOG+JTMosmA1InKGne1X+U4W PulQ4AogaajCJqGy176qfciMgIj67bLnSdUlgjwW4eq17Hc1nZtPDjbVUw2RuxlQ W1reGJnmSSw8MZE/xEgdPXiVot/9sx98Iy29OB19zQ2VYgQx8rk+ULE88/mpck/x rkn95eqJSlEcN7qOjaNg9pibPjUN/UUZMgQ8SmsLrUDIgveTRiMqWKbwY8566qz2 821JFjoIHLserHTr0+hMOuWYvyMY1kND0DnwIfzK9VrqPqEBY0tBdxwyx1iKItiq Cy/PFRE5d6FUhL7LjUznnnv/E4GDwdkXSe8YR9ddm6H/fgW7uL26Hw== =0w7k -END PGP SIGNATURE- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: puppet / works & does not work: the quantum effect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nico -telmich- Schottelius wrote: > Good morning dear puppet users, > > if you experience "it works - it does not work" situations with puppet > like I do, here may be the reason for it: > > http://www.nico.schottelius.org/blog/puppet-sometimes-loads-a-class/ > > I was told that this behaviour is "correct" on IRC, but I don't agree > with it: a configuration should either work or not, not both. > > What's your point of view? > Is my approach not the way puppet users/devs think or do you also see > this as a bug? - From reading your blog post I am not sure that behaviour/explanation is exactly correct but the best approach would be to log a ticket please. Thanks James Turnbull - -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEVAwUBSsEDbCFa/lDkFHAyAQJi6Af/Qc+A5bJf9yA5mf1TfMBHEj7NmesvK+T4 pQP00ypWEACvl4rLPP27n8clEUfjtCLtYlNrAj4Es4fLPeSVaDrFnxTbYL821gDs bH8lXCwJjwQYDbXjd8+BphQ1Y8VBt3rCGajO0tLUj9MLd7TNHbyqkKb9M+bFP1JH xy3GvVDZtV1gHVR8qMzqWTg/TmJZq8rWEyk6oJSJ2qwan2Zs/zSCYVjDaSN+Kkhn 3zEAZqX5QZ8OKS1KiHswljRZ5fWa87YYv2fNTaUcUZxm/auYeDZEUVYPiJe++OKA 0D4agiShQE4hXueUYoz32v7kbmv1W0V0nM0ra0J5662qSdZR7E7R7A== =tY3y -END PGP SIGNATURE- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
Love to but my flight won't get in until late afternoon. Have fun. On 9/28/09, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > If you're interested in coming along for lunch at Google on Wednesday > before Puppet Camp, let me know and I'll see if we can handle the load > :) > > > > -- > nigel > > > > -- Sent from my mobile device Alex Laslavic --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
I definitively would love to lunch at Google. Coming to SF Tuesday evening. We should also define some kind of meeting place&hour for the Wednesday evening meetup. I don't intend to sleep too much in the follwing days :-) Al On Sep 28, 8:40 pm, Alex Laslavic wrote: > Love to but my flight won't get in until late afternoon. Have fun. > > On 9/28/09, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > > > > If you're interested in coming along for lunch at Google on Wednesday > > before Puppet Camp, let me know and I'll see if we can handle the load > > :) > > > -- > > nigel > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > Alex Laslavic --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
On 28 Sep 2009, at 11:29 AM, Carl Caum wrote: > I'd definitely be interested in going but I don't get in to SF till > 11:00am. According to GMaps, the earliest I could get the Google > Campus is at 2:00pm by bus. Anyone have any suggestions? Caltrain should be faster -- especially if your flight is on time and you make the 11:31 southbound from Millbrae. See: http://flysfo.com/web/page/atsfo/airtrain/map/index.html http://www.caltrain.com/timetable.html#weekday-southbound -- Ian Ward Comfort System Administrator, Student Computing, Stanford University --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Wednesday night drinks?
Is anybody interested in getting together at my place downtown to drink scotch, talk Puppet, and chill out before the big day? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
Thanks. It still it looks like I couldn't get there before 2:00pm. Oh well, have fun. On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Ian Ward Comfort < icomf...@rescomp.stanford.edu> wrote: > > On 28 Sep 2009, at 11:29 AM, Carl Caum wrote: > > I'd definitely be interested in going but I don't get in to SF till > > 11:00am. According to GMaps, the earliest I could get the Google > > Campus is at 2:00pm by bus. Anyone have any suggestions? > > Caltrain should be faster -- especially if your flight is on time and > you make the 11:31 southbound from Millbrae. See: > >http://flysfo.com/web/page/atsfo/airtrain/map/index.html >http://www.caltrain.com/timetable.html#weekday-southbound > > -- > Ian Ward Comfort > System Administrator, Student Computing, Stanford University > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: copying file from multiple sources
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Luke Schierer wrote: > > This works for my redhat 5 machines, I'm able to pull from the array of > sources. However, it does n work for redhat 4 machines. If a redhat 4 > machine is listed in the array, I get > > err: Could not call fileserver.list: # called for nil.NilClass> > err: //Node[host1]/File[/path/to/target]: Failed to generate additional > resources durring transaction > > I am still unable to figure out why puppetd on rhel5 can pull from a puppetmaster on rhel5 but not a puppetmaster on rhel4. Again, any help would be greatly appreciated. Luke --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
I am very interested at coming to Google for lunch on Wednesday. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
Change of plans. I rented a car. I could make it if it's around 12:00 ish. On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Carl Caum wrote: > Thanks. It still it looks like I couldn't get there before 2:00pm. Oh > well, have fun. > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Ian Ward Comfort < > icomf...@rescomp.stanford.edu> wrote: > >> >> On 28 Sep 2009, at 11:29 AM, Carl Caum wrote: >> > I'd definitely be interested in going but I don't get in to SF till >> > 11:00am. According to GMaps, the earliest I could get the Google >> > Campus is at 2:00pm by bus. Anyone have any suggestions? >> >> Caltrain should be faster -- especially if your flight is on time and >> you make the 11:31 southbound from Millbrae. See: >> >>http://flysfo.com/web/page/atsfo/airtrain/map/index.html >>http://www.caltrain.com/timetable.html#weekday-southbound >> >> -- >> Ian Ward Comfort >> System Administrator, Student Computing, Stanford University >> >> >> >> >> > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
On 28/09/09 19:57, Nigel Kersten wrote: > If you're interested in coming along for lunch at Google on Wednesday > before Puppet Camp, let me know and I'll see if we can handle the load > :) I'd really love to come. I don't know yet where I'll be on wednesday, but there are great chances, I'll be in Los Altos, so not that far from the Google Campus... -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
Hi, I would be happy to join - Thanks Nigel :) if anyone needs a ride from the Serreno hotel (or nearby) , and / or want to drive together let me know :) Ohad On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > If you're interested in coming along for lunch at Google on Wednesday > before Puppet Camp, let me know and I'll see if we can handle the load > :) > > > > -- > nigel > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: external nodes issue
Hi Matt,
Thats a bit odd, when using external nodes you shouldn't need any node
definitions within your manifests.
any chance you have some leftover nodes definitions?
Ohad
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Matt wrote:
>
> Update:-
>
> I added a default node to a manifest file, just -
>
> node default {
>include env
> }
>
> This appears to have made the puppetmasterd kick in to action and
> compile the catalog from the foreman for that node. i.e. I see
> puppetmasterd compile all the correct classes for the node and not
> just the default one.
>
> notice: Compiled catalog for sl01.domain.sl in 0.14 seconds
>
> But the client is still giving -
> warning: Not using cache on failed catalog
> err: Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
>
>
>
> 2009/9/28 Matt :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've hit a wall trying to get external nodes working on our production
> > puppet master. I'm using the foreman to supply the external nodes
> > information and have it all working in the dev environment.
> >
> > I've started all processes in debug - running Puppet 0.25
> >
> > puppetd -
> > debug: Puppet::Network::Format[json]: false value when expecting true
> > err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on
> > SERVER: Could not find default node or by name with 'sl01.domain.sl,
> > sl01.domain, sl01' on node sl01.domain.sl
> > warning: Not using cache on failed catalog
> > err: Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
> >
> > puppetmasterd -
> > info: Not using expired node for sl01.domain.sl from cache; expired at
> > Mon Sep 28 09:28:47 +0100 2009
> > debug: Executing '/etc/puppet/node.rb sl01.domain.sl'
> > info: Caching node for sl01.domain.sl
> >
> > err: Could not find default node or by name with 'sl01.domain.sl,
> > sl01.domain, sl01' on node sl01.domain.sl
> > err: Could not find default node or by name with 'sl01.domain.sl,
> > sl01.domain, sl01' on node sl01.domain.sl
> >
> > foreman -
> > Processing HostsController#externalNodes (for 127.0.0.1 at 2009-09-28
> > 09:39:30) [GET]
> > Parameters: {"fqdn"=>"sl01.domain.sl", "action"=>"externalNodes",
> > "controller"=>"hosts"}
> > Completed in 9ms (View: 0, DB: 1) | 200 OK
> > [http://localhost/hosts/externalNodes?fqdn=sl01.domain.sl]
> >
> > manually -
> > # su - puppet
> > -bash-3.2$ cd /etc/puppet
> > -bash-3.2$ ./node.rb sl01.domain.sl
> > ---
> > parameters:
> > s3: "false"
> > puppetmaster: sl02.domain.sl
> > java: jre16007
> > domainname: domain.sl
> > classes:
> > - env
> > - ganglia
> >
> >
> > Anyone have any idea how I can find out whats going on?
> >
> > The only difference I can see between the production and dev boxes is
> > that the production box uses certdnsnames, as it has both external and
> > internal clients -
> > certname=sl02.domain.com
> > certdnsnames=sl02.domain.com:sl02.domain.sl
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Problem installing Solaris Datastream Package
Hi, I'm having problem with the way Puppet is processing Solaris datastream packages. The following error occurs: err: //Node[basenode]/openssl/Package[openssl-0.9.8k-sol10-x86-local]/ ensure: change from absent to present failed: Execution of '/usr/sbin/ pkgadd -a /etc/puppet/files/puppet -d /var/tmp/staging/openssl/ openssl-0.9.8k-sol10-x86-local -n openssl-0.9.8k-sol10-x86-local' returned 1: pkgadd: ERROR: no packages were found in The correct command would be /usr/sbin/pkgadd -a /etc/puppet/files/puppet -d /var/tmp/staging/ openssl/openssl-0.9.8k-sol10-x86-local Any help is appreciated. cheers, Andy --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] PuppetCamp is almost here
PuppetCamp is only a few days away. I know some people are already in San Francisco. Luke will be around tomorrow night and I'm coming in Wednesday morning. We should be hanging around the Serrano hotel Wednesday afternoon with the full Reductive Labs crew, Teyo, Markus, Rein and Scott. Come lobby for features and fixes or hack on your ideas with us. I believe James Turnbull, Brice Figureau, and Paul Nasrat should be around as well so there should be enough people around to shed light on nearly any Puppet related topic. And there are also some emergent plans to meet up for dinner... If you are in the neighborhood let us know (especially if you are staying at the Serrano) I should (mostly) know what is going on, so feel free to contact me. email works, but might be slower than calling/texting 615.554.8774 or message @littleidea on twitter (to allow for serendipitous coordination) For those of you who can't make it, the morning sessions are going to be recorded by SFSU folks with slides and everything. I'm toying with streaming/capturing some of the open space discussion, but the thing I'm most worried about is getting decent sound. At the very least, we should be posting notes and highlights. If anyone has any comments, questions or concerns, let me know. Regards, Andrew --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Puppet Users] Re: lunch at Google on Wednesday for Puppet Campers?
Hi Ohad, I'll come from Serrano too, so a shared car ride is welcomed. Meet you there tuesday evening or wednesday morning... Al On 29 Set, 03:12, Ohad Levy wrote: > Hi, > > I would be happy to join - Thanks Nigel :) > > if anyone needs a ride from the Serreno hotel (or nearby) , and / or want to > drive together let me know :) > > Ohad > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > > If you're interested in coming along for lunch at Google on Wednesday > > before Puppet Camp, let me know and I'll see if we can handle the load > > :) > > > -- > > nigel --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
