Re: GOOD Internal Modem
Are linmodems (pci modems) supported officially in rhl ? Do i need to pathc my kernel if i want a support for theese modems ? D On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 16:42, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > Mohamed Abubakkar Siddiqu wrote: > > > Pls suggest one Internal PCI modem with FAX support. > > I use a US Robotics/3Com 2977 PCI modem. Haven't had a single problem > with in daily use or in initial configuration. > > Tom > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > > -- Dams Nadé ActiVia Networks : http://www.activia.net/ Association AMIN : http://amin.unice.fr/
Re: GOOD Internal Modem
If fact, i was thinking about the pctel driver.. is it included in the red hat linux kernel ? Should I fill a bugzilla entry for an RFE ? D On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 17:35, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > FYI: Not all PCI modems are linmodems. The model I mentioned is a > hardware modem. That said, I don't think linmodems are officially > supported. > -- Dams Nadé ActiVia Networks : http://www.activia.net/ Association AMIN : http://amin.unice.fr/
Re: Kernel Compiles - "make bzImage" errors
It's a locale problem, try "LANG=en_US LC_ALL=en_US make bzImage". I had the same problem with my french locale some days ago... D On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 07:44, "Ricardo Jofré S." wrote: > The dev86-0.16.3-4 is installed , then why "make bzImage" errors : [snipped] -- Dams Nadé ActiVia Networks : http://www.activia.net/ Association AMIN : http://amin.unice.fr/
Re: Calling all KDE fans!!
If you want a prog from the Gnome Menu to be added to your panel you may just drag it from the menu and drop it onto the panel :) (drag & Drop is kewl..) And for Pavel, did you try the gnome Keyboard Layout Switcher Applet ? right-click on panel -> add to panel -> utility -> Keyboard Layout Switcher. D On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 15:59, Aaron Konstam wrote: > It is offical; according to a survey in Linux Journal KDE is prefered over GNOME. > Well explain how to do the following which ios easy in Gnome in KDE. > I want to have an icon on the panel at the bottom of the screen that will launch > an Xterm (or any arboitrary program for that matter). How is this done? I tried > for 1 hour yesterday and failed. -- Dams Nadé ActiVia Networks : http://www.activia.net/ Association AMIN : http://amin.unice.fr/ -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: Database/listing of all Psyche RPMs?
Install the "rpmdb-redhat" package :) It's on one of the 3 installation-needed cds. This will install a database in /usr/lib/rpmdb/i386-redhat-linux/redhat containing all redhat psyche packages. When some package you want to install complains about some dep you you may do rpm --redhatprovides to show if redhat provides this dep with one psyche package. You may also make some query like : rpm --dbpath /usr/lib/rpmdb/i386-redhat-linux/redhat -qa to list the packages (like you would to rpm -qa to list packages installed on your system). If you want to be really pervert you may even do rpm --dbpath /usr/lib/rpmdb/i386-redhat-linux/redhat --justdb -Uvh foo.rpm to complete the database with some custom dependancies of freshen it with RH errata (for example). Enjoy.. D On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 13:01, Neil Bird wrote: > >ISTR reading (docs. and/or install) of an RPM that contained a > database of all RH8 RPMs (as used by rpm for suggesting dependancies/the > redhatprovides option I'd never heard of). > >Am I imagining things? Where is it? What is it? How do I use it? > > -- > [neil@fnx ~]# rm -f .signature > [neil@fnx ~]# ls -l .signature > ls: .signature: No such file or directory > [neil@fnx ~]# exit > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > -- Dams Nadé ActiVia Networks : http://www.activia.net/ Association AMIN : http://amin.unice.fr/ -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
valgrind, rpm & libc.
Hello everybody. I need a little piece of advice about a program called valgrind. I grabbed the tar.bz file from its website (look for it on freshmeat.net) and as good redhat user i saw the spec file inside the tarball and tried to repackaged it. The build did complete without any problem and then i tried to install it. During the rpmbuild process there was this : Requires: /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_PRIVATE) perl(strict) Note the GLIBC_PRIVATE symbol. When i tried to install the i386.rpm i got : [root@enclume ~dnade]# rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/valgrind-1.0.4-1.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libc.so.6(GLIBC_PRIVATE) is needed by valgrind-1.0.4-1 [root@enclume ~]# rpm --redhatprovides 'libc.so.6(GLIBC_PRIVATE)' no package provides libc.so.6(GLIBC_PRIVATE) Does any rpm/glibc/valgrind guru could told were is the "bug" ? The valgrind spec file do not contain any "Requires" line. Is the glibc package incomplete ? Is --nodeps a solution ? Does valgrind provide this symbol but do not provide the RPM dependancy ? Please ? someone ? D -- Dams Nadé ActiVia Networks : http://www.activia.net/ Association AMIN : http://amin.unice.fr/ -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
The meaning of "APIC error on CPUx"
Hello all. For 2 months now, i have dual athlon MP with an Asus Motherboard A7M266-D. All seems working very very well (i still never crashed the box:) but in the dmesg output i can see theese messages : [anvil@gruyere ~]# dmesg|grep APIC APIC error on CPU1: 00(02) APIC error on CPU0: 00(02) APIC error on CPU1: 02(02) [snip] there's 2 or 3 messages like theese a day. What does it mean ? Will I have to replace the motherboard soon ? :/ Does anybody get the same problem ? How do i solve this ? TIA. D -- Dams Nadé ActiVia Networks : http://www.activia.net/ Association AMIN : http://amin.unice.fr/ -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: The meaning of "APIC error on CPUx"
It seems non-fatal for me too but i really would like to be sure about the possible consequences of theeses messages. And for the least i'm curious about their meaning.. BTW, i run X/Gnome/Bluecurve on this box. It's my workstation (not a server..) and as i said earlier, the box did not crashed since i got it. D On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 14:54, Hal Burgiss wrote: > Don't know about that board, but on Abit bp6, those errors are rampant > (100's/day sometimes), and it is hardware errors, though not > necessarily fatal. I've had them for years. > > [hal@cadillac tmp]$ ssh feenix uptime > 8:53am up 133 days, 5:01, 8 users, load average: 0.02, 0.07,0.03 > > No X on that though. -- Dams Nadé ActiVia Networks : http://www.activia.net/ Association AMIN : http://amin.unice.fr/ -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Problem with scsi disks.
Hello everybody. I had 2 disks on the same scsi bus and all seems to work perfectly. I bought some days ago a third disk and i've put it on the same bus than the 2 others. But here come problems : Jan 13 20:10:33 gruyere kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 return code = 802Jan 13 20:10:33 gruyere kernel: Current sd08:02: sense key Aborted Command Jan 13 20:10:33 gruyere kernel: Additional sense indicates Scsi parity error Jan 13 20:10:33 gruyere kernel: I/O error: dev 08:02, sector 318184 Jan 13 20:10:33 gruyere kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 return code = 802Jan 13 20:10:33 gruyere kernel: Current sd08:02: sense key Aborted Command Jan 13 20:10:33 gruyere kernel: Additional sense indicates Scsi parity error Jan 13 20:10:33 gruyere kernel: I/O error: dev 08:02, sector 322264 Jan 13 20:10:34 gruyere kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 return code = 802Jan 13 20:10:34 gruyere kernel: Current sd08:02: sense key Aborted Command Jan 13 20:10:34 gruyere kernel: Additional sense indicates Scsi parity error Jan 13 20:10:35 gruyere kernel: I/O error: dev 08:02, sector 315760 Jan 13 20:10:35 gruyere kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 return code = 802Jan 13 20:10:35 gruyere kernel: Current sd08:02: sense key Aborted Command Jan 13 20:10:35 gruyere kernel: Additional sense indicates Scsi parity error Jan 13 20:10:35 gruyere kernel: I/O error: dev 08:02, sector 315768 This involves read/write errors and inconsistencies in my raid array. As I understand this could be an hardware problem or maybe a kernel problem, I dont know exactly where.. Is there a jumper on the disks I should move ? Could this really be kernel issue ? Terminator stuff seems to be handled by the hostadapter. Scsi hostadapter is Adaptec AIC-7892B U160/m and disks are ultra160 SE/LVD. Could somebody give me a clue about this, please ? D -- Dams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ActiVia Networks -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
Re: PPTP On Redhat8.0
I'm in France and i use pptp-adsl-fr-1.0.2-8mdk (i know this is a mandrake package and this is really wrong, i promise i wont use any mdk package anymore !:) on a Red Hat 7.2. It works very well. If you want it you can download it at http://confiote.ath.cx/~anvil/pptp-adsl-fr-1.0.2-8mdk.src.rpm or http://confiote.ath.cx/~anvil/pptp-adsl-fr-1.0.2-8mdk.i686.rpm D You wrote : > On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 09:03, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 00:53, Roland Knall wrote: > > > > > > Sorry to bother, with just a stupid question, but did RH consider > > > including PPTP support into the distro? > > > > Do you mean PPPoE? That's supported. > > > No, and I know. > > > PPTP isn't supported in the distro, but that's a Microsoft VPN > > technology... > > > Yep. That's right. But despite the ideas I get from that combination ( > connecting to Windows networks using PPTP tunnels ) there is some other > usefule implementation of PPTP. Austria and France ( and some Asian > countries ) use for there xDSL connections hardware from Alcatel. And > this hardware enforces PPTP upon the users. On RH7.3 I was not able to > use my modem. The problem was somewhere underneath the routing ( I was > able to get on the machine from the internet, but not from the machine > into the internet ). > > PPTP is just a second method for xDSL connections and needs some > different configsettings which are not so hard to implement. Just wanted > to know if this is being planned by RH or not. -- Dams Nadé ActiVia Networks : http://www.activia.net/ Association AMIN : http://amin.unice.fr/
