XFree86 Problem

2003-08-17 Thread CJoeB
Hello All,

I encountered a problem with XFree86, the details of which follow. 
Please note that although I've come a way since I first started using
Linux, I am still reasonably "green" and have never encountered this
problem before, so I need explicit instructions on how to solve this if
anyone knows how.

The files attached are the XFree86.0.log file (obviously) and the
specific information on my computer (i.e. video chipset, etc.)
The events leading up to the problem are thus (please pardon the length
of this post, but I surmise that the more detail I give, the easier it
will be for someone to determine what happened and how to get it corrected):
From installation CD's, I installed Red Hat 9.0 on a computer
configured to dual-boot with Windows '98 SE.  The kernel version on
these CD's is 2.4.20-8.  Once the installation was complete, I added the
following software:  OpenOffice.org, Mozilla 1.4 (final), the JRE 
plug-in and Acrobat Reader.  These files I downloaded into Windows and 
then transferred to my Linux partition by mounting the vfat partition 
because I didn't have a working modem in Linux.  After this, I installed 
the Linuxant modem driver.  At this point everything worked fine.  I was
able to dial-up using kppp and connect to the internet.

At this juncture, I connected to the internet and ran Red Hat's up2date
service (demo account).  There were a lot of packages that needed to be
updated and it took 10 hours to download everything by modem.  Once this
was complete, I rebooted the computer and everything was still working.
Then, I tried connecting to the internet, but the modem wouldn't work -
this was because the modem driver compiles with the version of the
kernel being used.  Since the modem driver was in rpm format, I removed
it using rpm -e and reinstalled it with the new kernel version
2.4.20-19.9 which was the updated kernel version installed from running
up2date.  I was then able to connect to the internet again.
This is where the problem starts.  The next time I booted the computer
(I boot in text mode, rather than having x start automatically because,
if something happens like it did once before, I can at least get at my
files and transfer them to my Windows mount), the boot process went
okay, but when I tried to start x, x wouldn't start.  I got the error
message that it couldn't locate the module pcidata.  I am aware that the
file libpcidata.a is supposed to by located in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/
but it is now gone from my computer.
Earlier today after browsing on XFree86.org, I searched for libpcidata.a
and found a link where I could download the file.  I downloaded it in
Windows and transferred it to my Linux partition, and rebooted the
computer.  I still got the message that the module pcidata couldn't be
located.  I also got an additional message (not included in the log file
attached) something about "minor version (7) being newer that system
version (6)".
All I want to do is put the file libpcidata.a back on my computer in the
easiest way possible.  Can someone provide direction here?
Thanks in advance and regards to all.

Colleen


PCI devices found:
  Bus  0, device   0, function  0:
Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82810 DC-100 GMCH [Graphics Memory Controller Hub] (rev 
3).
  Bus  0, device   1, function  0:
VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82810 DC-100 CGC [Chipset Graphics 
Controller] (rev 3).
  IRQ 9.
  Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf800 [0xfbff].
  Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xff00 [0xff07].
  Bus  0, device  30, function  0:
PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801AA PCI Bridge (rev 2).
  Master Capable.  No bursts.  Min Gnt=6.
  Bus  0, device  31, function  0:
ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801AA ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 2).
  Bus  0, device  31, function  1:
IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801AA IDE (rev 2).
  I/O at 0xffa0 [0xffaf].
  Bus  0, device  31, function  2:
USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801AA USB (rev 2).
  IRQ 11.
  I/O at 0xff80 [0xff9f].
  Bus  0, device  31, function  3:
SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801AA SMBus (rev 2).
  IRQ 10.
  I/O at 0xdcd0 [0xdcdf].
  Bus  1, device   7, function  0:
Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] (rev 9).
  IRQ 9.
  Master Capable.  Latency=64.  Min Gnt=12.Max Lat=128.
  I/O at 0xecc0 [0xecff].
  Bus  1, device   8, function  0:
Communication controller: Conexant HCF 56k Data/Fax Modem (rev 8).
  IRQ 10.
  Master Capable.  Latency=64.  
  Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xfdff [0xfdff].
  I/O at 0xecb8 [0xecbf].
  Bus  1, device  12, function  0:
Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev 120).
  IRQ 5.
  Master Capable.  Latency=64.  Min Gnt=10.Max Lat=10.
  I/O at 0xec00 [0xec7f].
  Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xfdfefc00 [0xfdfefc7f].



XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Red Hat Linux release: 4.3.0-2)
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11

Xfree86 Problem

2003-08-19 Thread CJoeB


CJoeB wrote:
 

This is where the problem starts.  The next time I booted the computer
(I boot in text mode, rather than having x start automatically because,
if something happens like it did once before, I can at least get at my
files and transfer them to my Windows mount), the boot process went
okay, but when I tried to start x, x wouldn't start.  I got the error
message that it couldn't locate the module pcidata.  I am aware that the
file libpcidata.a is supposed to by located in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/
but it is now gone from my computer.
   

What does 'rpm -V XFree86' return?  For that matter, what does 'rpm -q 
XFree86' return?

You may be able to use up2date-nox to re-install the XFree86 package if 

The XFree86 package was damaged.  How it got damaged, I don't know 
because I didn't delete anything.  However, on another list, I was told 
that most people who had tried to reinstall XFree86 because of a module 
problem had not success.  I was chicken to re-install thinking that 
something that had been updated using up2date would get "broken".  
However, I bit the bullet, reinstalled XFree86 using the --force switch 
and the missing module files were put back in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/ 
and I was able to start X again.  Problem resolved.

Thanks.

Colleen

it's damaged.



--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: FAT32 Support is Still Alpha

2003-08-23 Thread CJoeB
Message: 4
From: Greg Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:  Fat32 support is still ALPHA
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:49:49 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I recently installed RH8.0 on my Dell Inspiron 2500 laptop, which is
dual boot and I have 2 DOS drives mounted. I get this message on
boot-up: checking filesystems - Fat32 support is still ALPHA.
Has anyone experience with this message, are there ever any bad effects
of alpha support?
Greg


I run RH 9.0 on a dual-boot Dell Optiplex GX100 and I get this message on boot all the time.  It, of course, has to do with your machine being configured to mount a DOS  or vfat partion while in Linux.

I have had NO problems with this.  I have to mount my Windows partition when I want to use it (I didn't want it to be mounted all the time), but I have sent many e-mails with attachments that gotten from my Windows mount.  I have also retrieved graphic files and text files that I've saved in Linux as well as copied files to my Windows mount and back to Linux.  I've even done the unforgivable, and forgotten to unmount the partition, but have not encountered any problems, but in this latter situation, I was lucky - it could have resulted in file corruption regardless of whether or not it was a Windows mount or not.  This by no means indicates that I'm an expert on this subject, but I have encountered no problems.

Colleen



--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Flash Player Problem

2003-08-24 Thread CJoeB
Hello All,

I'm trying to get the Macromedia Flash Player installed.  I have already 
read the documentation on the http://plugin.mozdev.org page and also the 
readme file that was part of the tarball for this plugin.

The http://plugin.mozdev.org page said to extract the tarball and put 
the libflashplayer.so and the flashplayer.xpt file in the 
/usr/local/mozilla/plugins/ directory.  I did this.  I also tried 
putting an additional copy of both these files in the 
/usr/local/mozilla/components/ directory.  In either case, the plugin is 
NOT recognized by the browser - i.e. isn't listed in my list of 
plugins.  I'm running Mozilla 1.4 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; 
en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624) on Redhat 9 with kernel 2.4.20-19.9.

If it makes any difference, besides the libnullplugin.so (the default 
plugin), I have the JRE plugin and the Adobe Acrobat plugin installed.  
They both work fine and show in my about:plugins list.

The http://plugin.mozdev.org page also said that "Scripting Flash does 
NOT work with gcc3 builds of Mozilla", but I'm not sure what that means 
and my version of gcc is 3.2.2.

Anyone who can offer assistance here has my gratitude.  Also, pardon the 
verbal diarrhea here, but I wanted to give as much detail as I could in 
case anyone can help.

Thanks.

Colleen

--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Flash Player Problem

2003-08-25 Thread CJoeB
Thanks for the assistance here.  I got the proverbial "slap on the 
wrist" ( VERY NICELY, I might add) for posting this message on the 
psyche list.  My apologies.  While, the particular problem was not 
specific to Red Hat 9, the solution is pertinent, so I will post it.

The solution to my problem was getting a backward compatible version of 
libstdc++ because the version that I have on my system was a newer 
version than the one needed by the Flash player.  I got the rpm for the 
correct version at rpmfind and once I installed it, the Flash Player 
worked fine.  So, despite the fact that my problem was related to 
Mozilla, the solution was provided by Red Hat.

Again, thanks for the assistance.

Colleen


Message: 7
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Flash Player Problem
From: "dave c" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:27:41 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



I am running Netscape 7.1 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 

I have the flash player working fine.

I use the following flash player:
File name: libflashplayer.so
Shockwave Flash 6.0 r79
I think I got it from here...

http://sdc.shockwave.com/shockwave/download/alternates/

Hope this helps.

--- On Sun 08/24, CJoeB < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: CJoeB [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:13:23 -0400
Subject: Flash Player Problem
Hello All,I'm trying to get the Macromedia Flash Player installed.  I have already read the documentation on the http://plugin.mozdev.org page and also the readme file that was part of the tarball for this plugin.The http://plugin.mozdev.org page said to extract the tarball and put the libflashplayer.so and the flashplayer.xpt file in the /usr/local/mozilla/plugins/ directory.  I did this.  I also tried putting an additional copy of both these files in the /usr/local/mozilla/components/ directory.  In either case, the plugin is NOT recognized by the browser - i.e. isn't listed in my list of plugins.  I'm running Mozilla 1.4 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624) on Redhat 9 with kernel 2.4.20-19.9.If it makes any difference, besides the libnullplugin.so (the default plugin), I have the JRE plugin and the Adobe Acrobat plugin installed.  They both work fine and show in my about:plug!
i!
ns list.The http://plugin.mozdev.org page also said that "Scripting Flash does NOT work with gcc3 builds of Mozilla", but I'm not sure what that means and my version of gcc is 3.2.2.Anyone who can offer assistance here has my gratitude.  Also, pardon the verbal diarrhea here, but I wanted to give as much detail as I could in case anyone can help.Thanks.Colleen-- Psyche-list mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

 



--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: removing directories even they are not empty

2003-09-15 Thread CJoeB


Message: 2
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 22:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: "M. Zabtoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: removing directories even they are not empty
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--0-1126043940-1063604756=:82683
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I have done a great expreiment with linux 8, installation and uninstallatoin of so many softwares. but it leave me with lot of directories and now i want to delete them at all. Is thier any way to delete them even they are full.

thankyou,
zabtoo
 

Use rm -Rf .  The R is for recursive which deletes all 
subdirectories beneath the one that you specify and the f forces the 
deletion without prompting.  Be careful here - make sure that you are 
sure that you have entered the directory name correctly.



--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list