Re: Problems with wu-ftpd

2003-02-22 Thread Bart SCHELSTRAETE
Banjo Donila wrote:

Im having problems accessing my ftp server remotely. But when I used my
dyndns to connect it works fine. Which also means that Im connecting
locally cause Im using the same ip address. Im behind the router and my
internal ip addy is 192.168.1.2. So then, Ive configured my router to
forward all incomming port 21 connections to 192.168.1.2. And ive found
some issues after this and its PASV PORT THEFT. I've resolve it already
by adding this line to /etc/ftpaccess
 

I don't really understand you. Can you ftp from the local machine or not?
Or is it only impossible to ftp from outside your network?
rgrds,

  Bart


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: System freeze / hang, ping responding, can connect but no serviceanswers

2003-02-23 Thread Bart SCHELSTRAETE
Stefan Neufeind wrote:

Hi,

I got a very weird problem with a RedHat-server. Occasionally (can't 
even say that its under "high load" or something like that) the 
system freezes / hangs. It's possible to ping the machine (responds 
normal) and you can even connect to ports like pop3 (110) which were 
open before. The connection is established but no service responds. 
The same for mail in general, ssh, http etc. Nothing! Even console 
doesn't work anymore until reboot.

The PC consists of a ASUS-P4B533-V-board with 2 Maxtor-HDDs and a cd-
drive. Machine is running regular redhat 8.0 (kernel etc.), with all 
RHN-updates applied, running latest apache 1.3.xx ...

It's a server in a serverhousing-farm and it's there for production 
use. So I can't simply take it off for a few days to play around with 
it.

Had the same problems with another server, different board, running 
RedHat 7.3 with all updates applied. After looking for every possible 
problem-solution I thought maybe it's a hardware defect. So I changed 
from Athlon-cpu to a Intel P4 with different board, also installed 
RedHat 8.0 (instead of 7.3) new from scratch. But problem still 
exists.

Only common thing: Both computers using same Maxtor-harddisks. But 
could this be the problem? Unfortunately (as described above) I can't 
simply take the computer down, change harddisks etc. ... not 
possible.

Did anybody experience such problem?
 

Hello,

It's difficult to tell you what the problem is.
Is it possible to send me your /var/log/messages file?
Also enable the SysRQ function, so you can see if that still works.


rgrds,

 Bart



--
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Aliased IP addresses

2003-02-23 Thread Bart SCHELSTRAETE
Cliff Sarginson wrote:

Hello,
What is the simplest way to add an alias IP on Redhat to a NIC on an
internal network .. I do not want to build a firewall around it, or
anything like that. I just want to have a NIC with several addresses on
it (e.g. 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 ...). It seems to me that it is 
somehow bound up with iptables..mmm..am I right ? 

A pointer or hint on where to look would be nice.
Thanks.
 

Hello,

For example:

   ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.1.1
   ifconfig eth0:2 192.168.1.2
   
rgrds,
 Bart



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: PROBLEM MOUNTING CDROM

2003-03-02 Thread Bart SCHELSTRAETE
Servie Platon wrote:

Hi,

I recompiled my RH 8.0 kernel, 2.4.18-14 to a monolithic 2.4.20 to 
enable NTFS read capability and other functionality on the new kernel.

The new kernel works fine though and can read ntfs partitions. 
However, I am having problems in mounting the cdrom drive and gets an 
error message like this:

mount :/dev/cdrom is not a valid block device

I checked on the /etc/fstab and there is an entry on the cdrom. My 
cdrom is a toshiba DVD-ROM SD-R2212 & CD Burner.

Prior to recompiliation of the kernel, where I can mount the cdrom 
with ease. Apparently the cdrom is a scsi cdrom, wherein the system 
gives me the message:

Attached scsi cd-rom sr0 at scsi 0, Channel 0, id 0, lun 0
sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 24x/24 writer cd/rw xa/form2 ccda
HEllo,

Is you cd-rom a REAL SCSI cd-rom or is it an IDE one? (using scsi-emulation)

Also just try this:   mount /dev/sr0 /mnt/cdrom

rgrds,

 Bart



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: transparent proxy + auth

2003-03-07 Thread Bart SCHELSTRAETE
Sergio Durand wrote:

hi there,

there're anyway to squid transparent proxy with squid ncsa auth ???
i saw in the squid help it isn't possible, but, there're alternative 
way to do this ??
because i wouldn't like set machine by machine clients server proxy 
and i need use auth ncsa ... 


If you're using authentication, then it's not a tranparent proxy.

rgrds,

 Bart



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: squid auth and ie6

2003-03-07 Thread Bart SCHELSTRAETE
Sergio Durand wrote:

hi ...
my squid auth works fine with netscape, mozilla and ie5 ...
but not with ie6 
microsoft support site confirm this bug and  say to wait the next 
service pack...
my doubt is: there're anyway to corret this by myself??
any setting in squid ?? or any change on the windows regist ??


Hello,

In IE 6 disable -> Tools -> Internet Options -> Advanced -> Show 
Friendly HTTP error messages.

rgrds,

 Bart



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: 3com 3c905b only at 10mb

2003-03-08 Thread Bart SCHELSTRAETE
Scott Mugan wrote:

I have a 3c905b installed under RH8. It is only running at 10Mb. I 
searched and found newer drivers for it but they need to be compiled 
into modules. I followed the directions to the letter but I keep 
getting tons of errors. The driver module that installs with RH8 is 
for a 3c59x, I looked through the modinfo and could not figure out how 
to set it for 100Mb instead of 10Mb, did I miss something?
TIA
-Scott
Hello,

Use 'mii-tool' for changing the speed.

rgrds,
Bart


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: RH 9 - new glibc

2003-03-28 Thread Bart SCHELSTRAETE




Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:

  On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:20:42PM -0600, Doug B wrote:
  
  
If I understand correctly, it seems the reason to jump a major version
is because the new glibc breaks binary compatability.

OK... that makes sense.

Why then would RedHat introduce a new glibc into RH 8 that breaks
compatabilty with some programs (wine comes to mind and apparently
VMWare)?  Shouldn't they have patched the glibc version that shipped
(and worked) rather than break RH 8 with a new version?

  
  
Do you know for sure that it breaks things?  I'm about to install
it today ...
  


Yes! It break things!!!





		Bart






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature