TWO Way Anova
Hi. Does PSPP support two way anova? I have been trying o do it with no success. If yes could I get a list of steps to follow per chance ? Thanks!
PSPP builds after Intel-only 1.6.2 on Mac Monterey 12.6 and later (M1/M2 Silicon chips / Universal rather than Rosetta stimulation)
Hello, I'm curious if PSPP after the 1.6.2 stable build for Mac (native only for Mac Intel) might be in development for use as a Universal (works natively without stimulation - Rosetta) on Apple Silicon chips: which are the chipsets used on Apple's M1 and M2 laptops of 1-2 years? Sometimes application developers create code for an Intel app and then for an Apple Silicon app separately which in that case they have separate builds available. But if they decide to create one app build that supports both Intel and Silicon natively without stimulation for silicon then it is a Universal app (and labeled as such in the Application - shown to the end-user who installs it). I know that Apple plans to end support for Rosetta stimulation at some point in the future and so I do hope that PSPP does have plans for native support in some way. I don't mind at all if the builds are separate. I will say after a restart PSPP v1.6.2 works reasonably well for me. But again, I'm curious if the developers think this would be easy to do. If they do make a Universal app, then in my mind the work becomes much easier after that point, as Apple would not be transitioning chips again for a long time! And a universal app would take care of both Intel and Silicon chip computers. Thanks! Patrick
Re: PSPP builds after Intel-only 1.6.2 on Mac Monterey 12.6 and later (M1/M2 Silicon chips / Universal rather than Rosetta stimulation)
None of the PSPP developers use a Mac. I don't know of anyone working on this. If anyone is, I hope they will speak up. On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 1:00 PM Patrick Davey Tully wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm curious if PSPP after the 1.6.2 stable build for Mac (native only for Mac > Intel) might be in development for use as a Universal (works natively without > stimulation - Rosetta) on Apple Silicon chips: which are the chipsets used on > Apple's M1 and M2 laptops of 1-2 years? Sometimes application developers > create code for an Intel app and then for an Apple Silicon app separately > which in that case they have separate builds available. But if they decide to > create one app build that supports both Intel and Silicon natively without > stimulation for silicon then it is a Universal app (and labeled as such in > the Application - shown to the end-user who installs it). > > I know that Apple plans to end support for Rosetta stimulation at some point > in the future and so I do hope that PSPP does have plans for native support > in some way. I don't mind at all if the builds are separate. > > I will say after a restart PSPP v1.6.2 works reasonably well for me. But > again, I'm curious if the developers think this would be easy to do. If they > do make a Universal app, then in my mind the work becomes much easier after > that point, as Apple would not be transitioning chips again for a long time! > And a universal app would take care of both Intel and Silicon chip computers. > > Thanks! > > Patrick >
Re: PSPP builds after Intel-only 1.6.2 on Mac Monterey 12.6 and later (M1/M2 Silicon chips / Universal rather than Rosetta stimulation)
Hi Patrick, you can try pspp on a Mac M1 / M2 via homebrew: https://github.com/fredowski/homebrew-pspp I currently do not plan to make a universal bundle. I have no clue how that works and I do not have a M1 laptop. Cheers Fritz > Am 18.09.2022 um 21:47 schrieb Patrick Davey Tully : > > Hello, > > I'm curious if PSPP after the 1.6.2 stable build for Mac (native only for Mac > Intel) might be in development for use as a Universal (works natively without > stimulation - Rosetta) on Apple Silicon chips: which are the chipsets used on > Apple's M1 and M2 laptops of 1-2 years? Sometimes application developers > create code for an Intel app and then for an Apple Silicon app separately > which in that case they have separate builds available. But if they decide to > create one app build that supports both Intel and Silicon natively without > stimulation for silicon then it is a Universal app (and labeled as such in > the Application - shown to the end-user who installs it). > > I know that Apple plans to end support for Rosetta stimulation at some point > in the future and so I do hope that PSPP does have plans for native support > in some way. I don't mind at all if the builds are separate. > > I will say after a restart PSPP v1.6.2 works reasonably well for me. But > again, I'm curious if the developers think this would be easy to do. If they > do make a Universal app, then in my mind the work becomes much easier after > that point, as Apple would not be transitioning chips again for a long time! > And a universal app would take care of both Intel and Silicon chip computers. > > Thanks! > > Patrick >
