Re: Interim NDR
On Sun, August 26, 2012 9:21 am, Wietse Venema wrote: > Voytek: > Yes, if you really want to. However I haven't used this code since > it was written many years ago. Let me know if it still works. Wietse, thanks. hmmm, I think maybe it's not the best idea... perhaps I should try a cacti threshold trigger first, (or just keep checking queuegraph/mq) thanks again, Voytek
Re: continous attempted connection/timeouts after ehlo
On Sun, August 26, 2012 8:35 am, Reindl Harald wrote: >> is it a 'good idea' to firewall block such when they're from > > depends on your business > i tend to do so at least for some days Reindl, so either of the two anvil/IP log lines indicates excess, yes ? Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection rate 15/1800s for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:59:14 Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection count 1 for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:50:26 Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max cache size 51 at Aug 27 05:59:47 you wouldn't happen to have a regex to pick up the offending IP ? my new Centos came with 'csf' so might try to feed offending IPs to csf for temp block (if I can figure out regex first) thanks again Voytek
Re: continous attempted connection/timeouts after ehlo
Am 26.08.2012 22:10, schrieb li...@sbt.net.au: > so either of the two anvil/IP log lines indicates excess, yes ? > > Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection rate > 15/1800s for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:59:14 > Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection count 1 > for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:50:26 > Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max cache size 51 at Aug > 27 05:59:47 why do you niot read what you post? ONE connection from 27.115.112.50 where do you see excess? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [SOLVED] connect to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[...]:25: Network is unreachable
Den 2012-08-24 14:17, Wietse Venema skrev: Shane: Excellent! Issue solved with the following line in my main.cf inet_protocols = ipv4 Postfix as distributed from postfix.org adds that by default. in 2.9.x this is not ipv4 but all and there is a warnning if ipv4 is in main.cf (to reminds of ipv6) even for kernels that dont have it
Re: OT: postfix configuration comments
Den 2012-08-24 05:57, Hari Hendaryanto skrev: is there any specific reason why those features not allowed/exist? # comment line in main.cf
Re: OT: postfix configuration comments
On 8/24/2012 4:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 24.08.2012 11:09, schrieb Hari Hendaryanto: On 8/24/2012 3:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 24.08.2012 05:57, schrieb Hari Hendaryanto: it's not really a problem, just my curiosity. I wonder why Postfix does not support comments such as "// comments or /* comments */ in" configuration file. is there any specific reason why those features not allowed/exist? because it supports bash-like # this is my comment i'm afraid i've already known that for years , that's why i'm asking.. :) so why do you need // too? wasted code to support every comment-style of any programming language i sometimes mistyped /* instead of # in long text comments ie: example 1 /* comments */ example 2 # # #comments # # # # The first example is simpler than Example 2 i'm not trying to compare with others, but "bind9" allow me to use "#" , "//", or "/*" in configuration file. as i said, "it's not really a problem (i think it was just my laziness)" , but in some cases it can greatly simplify things. thanks for all the responses PT.CITRA SARI MAKMUR SATELLITE & TERRESTRIAL NETWORK Connecting the distance - anytime, anywhere, any content http://www.csmcom.com
Re: continous attempted connection/timeouts after ehlo
On Mon, August 27, 2012 6:27 am, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection rate >> 15/1800s for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:59:14 >> Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection count 1 >> for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:50:26 Aug 27 06:00:03 >> postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max cache size 51 at Aug >> 27 05:59:47 >> > > why do you niot read what you post? > > ONE connection from 27.115.112.50 > where do you see excess? Reindl, thanks sorry, doesn't this mean to warn me of 'high-er' connect rates: 15/1800s ? "max connection rate 15/1800s " so what do I look for in anvil output ?
