Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

2023-01-22 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainers,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this port.
If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry.

An e-mail will not be sent again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
multimedia/gaupol   | 1.4-3   | 1.12
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Reported by:portscout!



replacing db5?

2023-01-22 Thread Robert Huff


This port is EOL from last June ... yet is still required by a
non-trivial nunber of ports (including /.e.g./ apache).
While I understand this is ulitmately up to the individual ports
- is there an effort to replace db5 so it can be removed for good?  If
so, who do I talk to?


Respectfully,


Robert Huff




Re: replacing db5?

2023-01-22 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 22 Jan 2023, at 19:38, Robert Huff  wrote:
> 
> This port is EOL from last June ... yet is still required by a
> non-trivial nunber of ports (including /.e.g./ apache).
> While I understand this is ulitmately up to the individual ports
> - is there an effort to replace db5 so it can be removed for good?  If
> so, who do I talk to?

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261523

-Dimitry



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


Re: replacing db5?

2023-01-22 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 01:38:55PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
> 
>   This port is EOL from last June ... yet is still required by a
> non-trivial nunber of ports (including /.e.g./ apache).
>   While I understand this is ulitmately up to the individual ports
> - is there an effort to replace db5 so it can be removed for good?  If
> so, who do I talk to?
>

Note Exim refuses to acknowledge Oracle BDB !

> 
>   Respectfully,
> 
> 
>   Robert Huff
> 
> 

-- 
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b 
Birthdate: 29 Jan 1969 Redhill, Surrey, England  Beware https://mindspring.com