Re: Qt6 in the ports tree

[Fernando Apesteguía]

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 7:31 PM Tobias C. Berner  wrote:
>
> Moin moin
>
> Qt6 has finally been added to the ports tree.
>
> As whenever we have multiple versions of things available, there will
> be dragons.
>
> Unfortunately we cannot find these dragons (unless we would add a
> USES=qt:6, USE_QT=... to all ports to force presence of Qt6 inside
> poudriere).
> So we expect that there will be some fallout of ports picking up the
> "wrong" Qt when building in an unclean environment.
>
> Please feel free to open a bug report if you encounter such an issue
> and assign it to kde@ so that we can fix those occurrences.

Thanks for the work!

>
>
> mfg Tobias
>

Ports with version numbers going backwards: emulators/libretro-ppsspp, emula...

[portmgr]

** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **

 For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
 version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
 Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for
 more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade
 and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH.

 Please fix any errors as soon as possible.

 The ports tree was updated at Mon Aug 22 2022 12:30:00 UTC.

- *emulators/libretro-ppsspp* : libretro-ppsspp-1.13.1_1 < 
libretro-ppsspp-1.13.1b
  (master: emulators/ppsspp)

- *emulators/ppsspp* : ppsspp-1.13.1_1 < ppsspp-1.13.1b

- *emulators/ppsspp-qt5* : ppsspp-qt5-1.13.1_1 < 
ppsspp-qt5-1.13.1b
  (master: emulators/ppsspp)

- *misc/gkrellmbgchg2* : gkrellmbgchg2-0.1.11_2 < 
gkrellmbgchg2-0.1.13

Can I get someone to look at ports/265712?

[Mel Pilgrim]

It's an easy-to-fix bug with python it from working with user-local 
pip-based installs, but it's gone two weeks without maintainer response.

Patching Conditionally for 12.3 Releases

[Nuno Teixeira]

Hello to all,

I'm about to patch a port only for 12.3 Release so build is fixed (due to
clang version 10.0.0.1)
My doubt is what the best option for OSREL:
(sample:)

.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 1100069
EXTRA_PATCHES=  ${PATCHDIR}/extra-patch-fbsd10
.endif

---
< 13.1 || == 12.3 thinking in future updates 13.x and 12.x.

 Thanks,
-- 
Nuno Teixeira
FreeBSD Committer (ports)

Re: Patching Conditionally for 12.3 Releases

[Nuno Teixeira]

(...)
OSVERSION} < 130 will match 12.x

Nuno Teixeira  escreveu no dia segunda, 22/08/2022
à(s) 21:52:

> Hello to all,
>
> I'm about to patch a port only for 12.3 Release so build is fixed (due to
> clang version 10.0.0.1)
> My doubt is what the best option for OSREL:
> (sample:)
>
> .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 1100069
> EXTRA_PATCHES=${PATCHDIR}/extra-patch-fbsd10
> .endif
>
> ---
> < 13.1 || == 12.3 thinking in future updates 13.x and 12.x.
>
>  Thanks,
> --
> Nuno Teixeira
> FreeBSD Committer (ports)
>


-- 
Nuno Teixeira
FreeBSD Committer (ports)