[SQL] calling EXECUTE on any exception

2005-07-29 Thread gherzig
Hi all: I want to call some FUNCTION , let say
exception_hanler(Exception_code) for any exception in plsql functions. I
give some pseudo code to explain myself better:

CREATE FUNCION something(...) returns ...
AS
'
...

EXCEPTION
  WHEN OTHER THEN
EXECUTE exception_handler(Exception_code)
...
'

and let exception_handler() function make all the work and returns some
value for mi program...Now, the actual question...how do i get that
error_code (or code_name, whatever i can get) generated in the something()
function to be proccesed by the exception_handler() function?

Im talking of 8.0 plsql language by the way.

Thanks in advance!
-- 
Gerardo Herzig
Direccion General de Organizacion y Sistemas
Facultad de Medicina

U.B.A.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [SQL] calling EXECUTE on any exception

2005-07-29 Thread gherzig
Oh...to bad...Thank you Michael!
Did someone know if it can be acomplished in pypgsql?

Thanks againg falks.
Gerardo
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:36:52AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> EXCEPTION
>>   WHEN OTHER THEN
>> EXECUTE exception_handler(Exception_code)
>>
>> how do i get that error_code (or code_name, whatever i can get)
>> generated in the something() function to be proccesed by the
>> exception_handler() function?
>
> I don't think you can do this in released versions of PostgreSQL.
> In 8.1 you'll be able to use SQLSTATE to get the error code and
> SQLERRM to get the error message.
>
> --
> Michael Fuhr
> http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
>
>



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


[SQL] [SOT] pypgsql function receiving dictionary as parameter?

2005-08-19 Thread gherzig
Hi all. Im a python programer, and im trying to use a dictionary
(associative array on Perl) in my pypgsql function without result. Anybody
know if it is possible?

Thanks a lot folks.
-- 
Gerardo Herzig
Direccion General de Organizacion y Sistemas
Facultad de Medicina
U.B.A.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [SQL] [SOT] pypgsql function receiving dictionary as parameter?

2005-08-19 Thread gherzig
Suppose this python structure:

someDict = {
'field1': 'Foo',
'creepyfield': 'Bar'
}

and the connection to the database
CONN = pg.connect()

I want some pypgslq function

CREATE myfunction ( __dictionary__) returns void
AS
 (process)
LANGUAGE pythonu

and (the desired goal) be able to execute
CONN.execute("select * from myfunction (someDict)")

Thanks again, and yes, i might post to the others postgres list too.

-- 
Gerardo Herzig
Direccion General de Organizacion y Sistemas
Facultad de Medicina
U.B.A.
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:13:20AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi all. Im a python programer, and im trying to use a dictionary
>> (associative array on Perl) in my pypgsql function without result.
>> Anybody
>> know if it is possible?
>
> Please show a minimal but complete example of what you're trying to do.
>
> BTW, pgsql-sql is supposed to be for SQL-related matters; this thread
> would be more appropriate in pgsql-general or pgsql-interfaces.
>
> --
> Michael Fuhr
>
>



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


[SQL] refer a column as a varible name?

2005-09-12 Thread gherzig
Hi all. I have troubles trying to achieve this assignment:
suppose the

type mycolumn as (field1, varchar, field2 varchar)
and

field_name = ''field1''

and returnValue declared as mycolumn
...
can i say returnValue.$field_name = ''ok''?
There is a way to achieve this piece of code?

Thanks  a lot!

-- 
Gerardo Herzig
Direccion General de Organizacion y Sistemas
Facultad de Medicina
U.B.A.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [SQL] refer a column as a varible name?

2005-09-13 Thread gherzig
Im using pg 8.0. I personally dont have problem in using pl/perl, but none
of my companions is a perl programmer, so i guess the IF..THEN seems to be
an easy (altough not preferable) solution.

Thank you very much Michael.

Gerardo
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:21:22PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> suppose the
>>
>> type mycolumn as (field1, varchar, field2 varchar)
>> and
>>
>> field_name = ''field1''
>>
>> and returnValue declared as mycolumn
>> ...
>> can i say returnValue.$field_name = ''ok''?
>
> To achieve this in PL/pgSQL you'll need to use a conditional statement
> (IF field_name = 'field1' THEN ...).  I'm not sure if a solution
> involving EXECUTE is possible; if so then it's probably non-obvious.
>
> What version of PostgreSQL are you using, and do you have a requirement
> to use PL/pgSQL?  In 8.0 PL/Perl can return composite types and such
> an assignment would be trivial:
>
> CREATE TYPE mycolumn AS (field1 varchar, field2 varchar);
>
> CREATE FUNCTION foo(varchar) RETURNS mycolumn AS $$
> my $field_name = $_[0];
> my $returnValue = {$field_name => "ok"};
> return $returnValue;
> $$ LANGUAGE plperl IMMUTABLE STRICT;
>
> SELECT * FROM foo('field1');
>  field1 | field2
> +
>  ok |
> (1 row)
>
> SELECT * FROM foo('field2');
>  field1 | field2
> +
> | ok
> (1 row)
>
> --
> Michael Fuhr
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>


-- 
Gerardo Herzig
Direccion General de Organizacion y Sistemas
Facultad de Medicina
U.B.A.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


[SQL] problem using regexp_replace

2010-01-10 Thread gherzig
Hi all. Im having a hard time here. Really have no idea what is wrong here.

Facing a special case of text substitution, i have to parse a column like
this one:
SELECT formato from table where id=1;

{Action_1.842}{Action_2.921}[truncated]

The numbers at the rigth of the period identifies an argument to the
function identified to "Action_x"
Every {Action_x} is asociated to a diff function , so i have a helper
function to identify the "Action" part:

CREATE FUNCTION valores_sustitucion(valor_ingresado varchar[])
returns varchar
as
$$
select case
  $1[1] when 'Action_1' then
(select descripcion from load_by_cod($1[2]))

   when 'Action_2' then (select descripcion from pay_by_view($1[2])

 else 'FALSE'
end;
$$ language sql;

So, the idea is, to call associated function with every "Action_x", with
the number as the argument to that associated function.

So, i come with this:
SELECT regexp_replace(
formato, E'{([^.]*)\.([a-zA-Z0-9]*)},
valores_sustitucion(ARRAY[E'\\1'::varchar,E'\\2'::varchar]),
 'g')
from table where id =1;

FALSEFALSE

The valores_sustitucion() functions is called, but the case construction
is failing. I have tested the regular expression, and its fine.
It looks like is something with the grouping and using that groups as the
argument of the valores_sustiticion() funcion.

Anybody has a hint?
Thanks!

Gerardo


-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql


Re: [SQL] problem using regexp_replace

2010-01-11 Thread gherzig
> On 2010-01-11, [email protected]  wrote:
>
>> CREATE FUNCTION valores_sustitucion(valor_ingresado varchar[])
>> returns varchar
>> as
>> $$
>> select case
>>   $1[1] when 'Action_1' then
>> (select descripcion from load_by_cod($1[2]))
>>
>>when 'Action_2' then (select descripcion from pay_by_view($1[2])
>>
>>  else 'FALSE'
>> end;
>> $$ language sql;
>
>> Anybody has a hint?
>
> you are missing a )
>

Oh, thats a copy-paste problem, sory about that.
I forgot to mention, this is a 8.3 running on linux.

Gerardo


-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql


Re: [SQL] problem using regexp_replace

2010-01-12 Thread gherzig
> On 2010-01-11, [email protected]  wrote:
>
>> So, i come with this:
>> SELECT regexp_replace(
>> formato, E'{([^.]*)\.([a-zA-Z0-9]*)},
>> valores_sustitucion(ARRAY[E'\\1'::varchar,E'\\2'::varchar]),
>>  'g')
>> from table where id =1;
>
> select valores_sustitucion(ARRAY[E'\\1'::varchar,E'\\2'::varchar]);
>
>   valores_sustitucion
>   -
>FALSE
>
> that's the problem you are getting, the valores_sustitucion works on
> the values given and that result is given to regexp_replace.
>
> try this:
>
> create OR REPLACE function magic( inp text ) returns text as $F$
> DECLARE
> tmp text;
> res text;
> BEGIN
>   tmp= 'SELECT ' ||
> regexp_replace(quote_literal(inp),E'{([^.]*)\.([a-zA-Z0-9]*)}',
>   $s$'|| valores_sustitucion(ARRAY[E'\1',E'\2']) ||'$s$,'g');
> --raise notice 'tmp=%',(tmp);
>   EXECUTE tmp INTO res;
>   RETURN res;
> END;
> $F$ language plpgsql;
>
> SELECT magic( formato ) FROM from table where id =1;
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
>
>
You hit that really hard, Jasen, thank you very much!!
You save my week :)

Thanks again.
Gerardo


-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql


Re: [SQL] best index for ~ ordering?

2007-03-06 Thread gherzig
Well, im wondering if is possible using LIKE '%blah%', even better would be
upper/lower(string) like '%blah%',

Im not at work right now, i will try it latter and makes you know about
the results of using tsearch indexing.

Thanks a lot, man!
Gerardo
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:34:23PM -0300, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
>> Hi all, i have a large table with one varchar field, and im triyng to
>> get information about what index should i use in order to using that
>> index (if this is possible) for ~ searching, and/or using LIKE
>> searching.
>
> What sort of match are you doing?  If you're doing left-anchored
> searches (LIKE 'blah%') then your standard btree is good.  If you're
> doing unanchored searches (LIKE '%blah%' or similar) you're best doing
> tsearch.  If it's right-anchored, you can do an index on the reverse
> of the string.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unfortunately reformatting the Internet is a little more painful
> than reformatting your hard drive when it gets out of whack.
>   --Scott Morris
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>


-- 
Gerardo Herzig
Direccion General de Organizacion y Sistemas
Facultad de Medicina
U.B.A.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [SQL] index not being used. Why?

2007-03-09 Thread gherzig
Thanks all you guys. Indeed, populating the tables with 10.000 entrys make
the things different, and now it uses all the indexes as i spect. It was
just a matter of being pacient and loading more data to test it out and
see.

And, yes, i need to upgrade psql now. Actually the real server has an
8.2.0 engine.

Thanks all you guys!
Gerardo
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 09:01, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
>> Hi all. I have this 2 relations
>>
>
> SNIP
>
>>Index Cond: ((upper((word)::text) ~>=~ 'TEST'::character
>> varying) AND (upper((word)::text) ~<~'TESU'::character
>> varying))
>>->  Hash  (cost=9.08..9.08 rows=408 width=55)
>>  ->  Seq Scan on pages  (cost=0.00..9.08 rows=408 width=55)
>>
>>  (8 rows)
>>
>>
>> Watch the last row of the explain command. It makes a sequential scan
>> on the pages table, like it is not using the index on the "id" field.
>>
>> The result itself is OK, but i will populate the tables so i think
>> that later that sequential scan would be a problem.
>
> Welcome to the world of tomorrow!  hehe.  PostgreSQL uses a cost based
> planner.  It decided that an index would cost more than a seq scan, so
> it chose the seq scan.  As mentioned in other posts, you'll need to do
> an analyze.  Also, look up things like vacuum / autovacuum as well.
>
>> Im using postgres 8.1.3
>
> You need to upgrade to 8.1.8 or whatever the latest version is by the
> time this email gets to you :)  8.1.3 is about a year out of date.
>
>
>


-- 
Gerardo Herzig
Direccion General de Organizacion y Sistemas
Facultad de Medicina
U.B.A.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


[SQL] foreign key pointing to diff schema?

2007-08-10 Thread gherzig
Hi all. Can i make a FK who points a table in a different schema? Or this
is implemented via a trigger by my own?

Thanks!
Gerardo


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [SQL] foreign key pointing to diff schema?

2007-08-10 Thread gherzig
> On 8/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all. Can i make a FK who points a table in a different schema? Or
>> this
>> is implemented via a trigger by my own?
>
> Sure.  just prefix the table name with the schemaname and a .
>
> create schema abc;
> alter user me set search_path='abc', 'public';
> create table z1 (id int primary key);
>  \d z1
> Table "abc.z1"
>  Column |  Type   | Modifiers
> +-+---
>  id | integer | not null
> Indexes:
> "z1_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
>
> (Note the abc.z1 there)
> create schema test3;
>  create table test3.z2 (id int primary key, z1id int references
> abc.z1(id));
> \d test3.z2
>Table "test3.z2"
>  Column |  Type   | Modifiers
> +-+---
>  id | integer | not null
>  z1id   | integer |
> Indexes:
> "z2_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
> Foreign-key constraints:
> "z2_z1id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (z1id) REFERENCES z1(id)
>
>
> basically, schemas are just distinct name spaces.
>
Im sory, that was just a matter of trying and see, isnt? I guess i need a
beer :) Thanks for the example and the explanation!

Gerardo


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [SQL] reading WAL files in python

2008-01-07 Thread gherzig
>
> On Jan 7, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
>
>> Hi all. Im having some fun trying to write my own replication
>> system using python. I will use the postgres own WAL archiving to
>> write the files,  then my app will read them and do some stuff. As
>> im not a C programmer, im stuck in the mission of reading the
>> binary files.
>>
>> I guess im needing to know the internals of how wals archives are,
>> how big the buffer has to be, in order to have a complete sql command.
>>
>> Can someone point some advice?
>> I was trying to understad src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c, but
>> seems too difficult to me :(
>
> The biggest problem with what you're wanting to do here is that the
> data written to the WALL archives isn't going to be at all easily
> translatable into SQL statements.  AFAIK, the WAL data records on-
> disk file changes, i.e. it's strictly a binary mode scenario.  As
> someone has already suggested, if you want to learn more about
> Postgres and Python, look at Skytools.  I'm not just saying to use
> it, read the code and, if you like, offer help with patches.
>
> Erik Jones
So the fun ends in 3, 2, 1

Well, so it looks like the trigger approach is now my path to follow.
Yeah, im looking for skytools code, looks very nice, maybe a little
outdate (just a quick look, it uses old-style python classes).

BTW, the information about WAL system you gave me, just saves me a lot of
time. Thanks you for that!
Gerardo


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


[SQL] specifying wal file size

2008-03-31 Thread gherzig
Hi dudes. Im trying to find out how to deal with this. I just receive a
1.2 MB wal file (may some 'windows home version' do that?), and obviosly,
when i try to recovery from there, get the 'incorrect file size' error.
Acording to the docs, wal file size can be changed at compile time. Not so
bad, i can do that. But where is that code?

BTW: 1163398 bytes seems like a wrong size for any wal file, isnt?
The .backup file may have been created under windows, and im working on
Linux. Could that be a problem?

Thanks!
Gerardo


-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql


[SQL] trying to repair a bad header block

2008-10-29 Thread gherzig
Hi all. I've seen this searching in google. After a select on a table, i
got this:
ERROR: invalid page header in block 399 of relation "xxx"

I read about a tool called pg_filedump, and after some searchs about its
usage, i execute
pg_filedump $PG_DATA/base/xx/1234 (1234 is the oid of table xxx)

As expected, i found the "Invalid header information" in block 399.
Lots of this things inside:
Block  399 
 -
 Block Offset: 0x0031e000 Offsets: Lower1663 (0x067f)
 Block: Size0  Version   95Upper   0 (0x)
 LSN:  logid 5714531 recoff 0x00e0  Special  60660 (0xecf4)
 Items:  410   Free Space: 4294965633
 Length (including item array): 1660

 Error: Invalid header information.

 --
 Item   1 -- Length:0  Offset: 2600 (0x0a28)  Flags: 0x00
 Item   2 -- Length:0  Offset:0 (0x)  Flags: 0x00
 Item   3 -- Length:0  Offset:0 (0x)  Flags: 0x00
 Item   4 -- Length:0  Offset:0 (0x)  Flags: 0x00
 Item   5 -- Length: 32767  Offset: 32767 (0x7fff)  Flags: USED
  Error: Item contents extend beyond block.
 BlockSize<8192> Bytes Read<8192> Item Start<65534>.

This for several items.
Im triyng to 'repair' those items in any way, so i can dump the database
and analyze the hardware.

There is a way to 'correct' or blank the values somehow? I guess im going
to lose some data, iisnt...

Any hints?

Gerardo




-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql


Re: [SQL] trying to repair a bad header block

2008-10-30 Thread gherzig
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 If you can tolerate losing the data on that page, just zero out the
 entire 8K page.  dd from /dev/zero is the usual tool.
>>
>>> Would zero_damaged_pages work here?  I know it's a shotgun to kill a
>>> flea, but it's also easier and safer for a lot of folks than dding a
>>> page in their table.
>>
>> It would work, but if you have any *other* damaged pages you might
>> lose more than you were expecting ...
>
> Agreed.  OTOH, on slip of the fingers for a newbie with dd and the
> whole table is gone.  I guess it's always a trade off.
>
>
Thanks Tom and Scott! I just use dd for simply creating big files (oh, and
once to screw up a entire disk :)

Im going to man it in order to zero out that page(s).

Wish me lucks, dudes.
Thanks!

Gerardo



-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql


Re: [SQL] trying to repair a bad header block

2008-10-30 Thread gherzig
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> Oh, and to reply to myself and the original poster, you need to figure
> out what's causing the pages to get damaged.  IT's usually bad
> hardware, then a buggy driver, then a buggy kernel / OS that can cause
> it.  Run lots of tests.
>
Oh yes, im facing hw problems. All im triyng to do now is 'rebuild' the
header blocks in order to do some pg_dump (whichs is failing, off course),
set a new machine and get the actual one to the pits :)

Thanks again!

Gerardo



-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql


Re: [SQL] dynamic OUT parameters?

2009-01-30 Thread gherzig
> Gerardo Herzig wrote:
>
>> 1) There is a way to make a function returning "any amount of any type
>> of arguments"?
>
> RETURNS SETOF RECORD
>
> The application must, however, know what columns will be output by the
> function ahead of time and call it using an explicit column declaration
> list. For example, the following function returns a table of width
> `_ncols' columns repeated over `_ncols' records:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION dyncol(_ncols INTEGER) RETURNS SETOF RECORD
> AS
> $$
> DECLARE
>   _out RECORD;
>   _stm text;
>   _i integer;
> BEGIN
>   _stm = 'SELECT 1';
>   FOR _i IN 2.._ncols LOOP
> _stm = _stm || ', ' || _i;
>   END LOOP;
>   _stm = _stm || ' FROM generate_series(1,' || _ncols || ');' ;
>   FOR _out IN EXECUTE _stm LOOP
> RETURN NEXT _out;
>   END LOOP;
> END;
> $$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
>
>
> Because Pg must know what the return columns will be before the function
> is called, you can't just call it as `dyncol(4)' :
>
> test=> SELECT dyncol(4);
> ERROR:  set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a set
> CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function "dyncol" line 12 at RETURN NEXT
>
> you must instead specify a table alias with a column definition, eg:
>
> test=> SELECT * FROM dyncol(4) AS x(a INTEGER, b INTEGER, c INTEGER, d
> INTEGER);
>  a | b | c | d
> ---+---+---+---
>  1 | 2 | 3 | 4
>  1 | 2 | 3 | 4
>  1 | 2 | 3 | 4
>  1 | 2 | 3 | 4
> (4 rows)
>
>
> Of course, nothing stops you from writing another function that provides
> this information to the application, so it can call the first function
> to get the information required to correctly call your dynamic reporting
> function.
>
>> 2) Can i make a special type "on_the_fly" and returning setof
>> "that_type"?
>
> You're better off using SETOF RECORD, at least in my opinion.
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
Oh, that looks promising. I wrongly supposed that RETURNING SETOF RECORD
forces the use of OUT parameters. I will give your idea a try.

Thanks Craig!
Gerardo


-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql


Re: [SQL] dynamic OUT parameters?

2009-01-31 Thread gherzig
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Oh, that looks promising. I wrongly supposed that RETURNING SETOF RECORD
>> forces the use of OUT parameters. I will give your idea a try.
>
> Tom Lane's point about using a refcursor is (unsurprisingly) a good one.
> If you return a refcursor from your function, you don't have to do any
> special work to call the function, and you can (with most DB access
> APIs) FETCH records from the cursor rather conveniently.
>
> See:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/plpgsql-cursors.html
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
Well, aparenty my problem remains, because the boss want that the
programmers just need to call
select * from report('table_name'). Following your previous sample
function, im forced to use it in the form
select * from report('table_name') as x(a int, b varchar, c int), and that
"as x(...)" is the kind of thing hes triyng to avoid. Same feeling about
fetching records at application level. To bad for me, im affraid :(

Gerardo



-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql