Re: Full Text Search

[Julien Champalbert]

Thank you David for your response, it makes sense now.

Julien 

> Le 29 oct. 2023 à 22:02, David G. Johnston  a 
> écrit :
> 
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023, 13:58 PG Doc comments form  > wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/textsearch-limitations.html 
> 
> Description:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> In the FTS/Limitations part of the documentation, it says :
> 
> "Another example — the PostgreSQL mailing list archives contained 910,989
> unique words with 57,491,343 lexemes in 461,020 messages."
> 
> How could the number of lexemes be greater than unique words ?
> 
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/textsearch-parsers.html 
> 
> 
> Note the part with the hyphenated word example.
> 
> David J.

Missing word? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL

[Daniel Westermann (DWE)]

Hi,

"Another way to archive is to use a custom archive module as the 
archive_library"

shouldn't this read:
"Another way to archive this is to use a custom archive module as the 
archive_library"

Regards
Daniel

Re: Missing word? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL

[Laurenz Albe]

On Mon, 2023-10-30 at 13:15 +, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> "Another way to archive is to use a custom archive module as the 
> archive_library"
> 
> shouldn't this read:
> "Another way to archive this is to use a custom archive module as the 
> archive_library"

That would be worse than the original.  What is "this"?

I'd suggest "Another way to archive WAL ...".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Re: Missing word? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL

[Daniel Westermann (DWE)]

>>> "Another way to archive is to use a custom archive module as the 
>>> archive_library"
>>
>> shouldn't this read:
>> "Another way to archive this is to use a custom archive module as the 
>> archive_library"

>That would be worse than the original.  What is "this"?
>I'd suggest "Another way to archive WAL ...".

I've misread archive as achieve. Sorry for the noise

Regards
Daniel