Re: doc: cosmetic changes in index items
On 2020/11/22 6:32, Euler Taveira wrote: On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 12:26, Fujii Masao mailto:masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com>> wrote: I found that only the following three index items have " ," (i.e., space + comma) in the docs. This is not harmful and is very minor issue, but I'd like to get rid of that unnecessary space character for the sake of consistency. Thought? Good catch. +1. Pushed. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
Missing time zone data
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/view-pg-timezone-names.html Description: pg_timezone_names supposedly has the list of full time zone names (e.g., US/Eastern) used in Postgresql, but all it has is the list of columns for the list. The list itself appears to be missing.
Re: Missing time zone data
PG Doc comments form writes: > pg_timezone_names supposedly has the list of full time zone names (e.g., > US/Eastern) used in Postgresql, but all it has is the list of columns for > the list. The list itself appears to be missing. Hm, works for me: regression=# select * from pg_timezone_names; name | abbrev | utc_offset | is_dst +++ Africa/Accra | GMT| 00:00:00 | f Africa/Algiers | CET| 01:00:00 | f Africa/Bissau | GMT| 00:00:00 | f Africa/Casablanca | +01| 01:00:00 | t ... etc etc ... W-SU | MSK| 03:00:00 | f Poland | CET| 01:00:00 | f Kwajalein | +12| 12:00:00 | f NZ-CHAT| +1345 | 13:45:00 | t (1187 rows) My guess is you've got an installation problem that prevents PG from finding the tzdb file tree. But it's hard to debug that on the strength of no information about the server configuration. In any case, I don't think this is a documentation issue ... regards, tom lane
Functions should be Functions & Procedures
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html Description: Hi, since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well? Regards Daniel
