The documentation on Partitions does not document the DEFAULT partition

2018-12-21 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/index.html
Description:

The documentation on Partitions for PostGreSQL 11 does not document the
DEFAULT partition that can be used to store values that do not match any of
the defined partitions.  I had to search the web to find out how to use
it.

Cheers.


Re: tickling the lesser contributor's withering ego

2018-12-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2018-Nov-04, Erik Rijkers wrote:

> I wouldn't mind if this page:
>   https://www.postgresql.org/community/contributors/
> 
> contained a link to (contributors v11):
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/static/release-11.html#id-1.11.6.5.6
> 
> and to (contributors v10)
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-11.html#id-1.11.6.5.6

I propose the following patch, which will make those links stable --
then we can add the following links to the contributors page:

https://www.postgresql/org/docs/10/release-10.html#RELEASE-10-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
https://www.postgresql/org/docs/11/release-11.html#RELEASE-11-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-10.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-10.sgml
index aacdd360e0..c72b4c931e 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/release-10.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-10.sgml
@@ -8990,7 +8990,7 @@ This was disabled in the PG 9.6 branch so there is no commit here.
 
   
 
-  
+  
Acknowledgments
 

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml
index f35b0d8cc9..faa5835de4 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml
@@ -3617,7 +3617,7 @@ same commits as above
 
   
 
-  
+  
Acknowledgments
 



Re: tickling the lesser contributor's withering ego

2018-12-21 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> I propose the following patch, which will make those links stable --
> then we can add the following links to the contributors page:
> https://www.postgresql/org/docs/10/release-10.html#RELEASE-10-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
> https://www.postgresql/org/docs/11/release-11.html#RELEASE-11-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Seems reasonable, but note the lag time --- unless somebody does
something out of the ordinary, those pages won't actually have
such tags till after the February minor releases.

regards, tom lane



Re: tickling the lesser contributor's withering ego

2018-12-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2018-Dec-21, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> > I propose the following patch, which will make those links stable --
> > then we can add the following links to the contributors page:
> > https://www.postgresql/org/docs/10/release-10.html#RELEASE-10-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
> > https://www.postgresql/org/docs/11/release-11.html#RELEASE-11-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
> 
> Seems reasonable, but note the lag time --- unless somebody does
> something out of the ordinary, those pages won't actually have
> such tags till after the February minor releases.

Good point.  That seems acceptable to me.

Erik, are you willing to propose a patch for the pgweb side of things?

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Re: tickling the lesser contributor's withering ego

2018-12-21 Thread Erik Rijkers

On 2018-12-21 16:17, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

On 2018-Dec-21, Tom Lane wrote:


Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> I propose the following patch, which will make those links stable --
> then we can add the following links to the contributors page:
> https://www.postgresql/org/docs/10/release-10.html#RELEASE-10-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
> https://www.postgresql/org/docs/11/release-11.html#RELEASE-11-ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Seems reasonable, but note the lag time --- unless somebody does
something out of the ordinary, those pages won't actually have
such tags till after the February minor releases.


Good point.  That seems acceptable to me.

Erik, are you willing to propose a patch for the pgweb side of things?


Yes, sounds reasonable.  I think I can cobble something together.