Postgre Licence
Whilst the PostgreSql licence is refreshingly simple, I find the instruction on how to use it a little confusing. "substitute the copyright year and name of the copyright holder into the body of the license. Copyright (c) $YEAR, $ORGANIZATION" Who is the copyright holder and what year should be entered? Mark __
Re: Postgre Licence
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Mark Williams wrote: > Whilst the PostgreSql licence is refreshingly simple, I find the > instruction on how to use it a little confusing. > You should probably just ignore whatever it is that you found and refer to the following on the website: https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/ David J.
RE: Postgre Licence
Thanks. That makes much more sense. Mark __ From: David G. Johnston Sent: 13 August 2018 18:11 To: Mark Williams Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Postgre Licence On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Mark Williams mailto:markwilli...@gmail.com> > wrote: Whilst the PostgreSql licence is refreshingly simple, I find the instruction on how to use it a little confusing. You should probably just ignore whatever it is that you found and refer to the following on the website: https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/ David J.
No _fdw link at FOREIGN TABLE documentation
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-createforeigntable.html Description: The page "sql-createforeigntable" citate OPTIONs but not where (??) the valid options. Example of documentation to be linked https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/file-fdw.html
Re: No _fdw link at FOREIGN TABLE documentation
=?utf-8?q?PG_Doc_comments_form?= writes: > The page "sql-createforeigntable" citate OPTIONs but not where (??) the > valid options. Example of documentation to be linked > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/file-fdw.html If there were a fixed set of FDWs that we could reference there, it'd be worth doing, but I don't see much value in linking to sample FDWs just because they happen to be part of the main distribution. regards, tom lane