Re: Documented toolchain for building docs on Windows

2018-07-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 29.06.18 18:51, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 29 Jun 2018, at 15:08, Peter Eisentraut 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> On 6/28/18 13:19, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Unless someone steps up before 11 is rolled, maybe builddoc.pl should be 
>>> made
>>> into a exit immediately no-op since "nothing" is better than “broken”?
>>
>> I'm thinking, just delete the file and the documentation section.
> 
> Well, that's a pretty decisive way to make it a no-op =) The attached patch
> does that, along with a note in the relnotes to highlight the dropped support
> which I think is warranted should we take this approach.

I have committed this to master now.  The scripts have already been
broken since PG10, so mentioning it in the PG11 release notes doesn't
seem appropriate.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Re: Password encryption

2018-07-13 Thread pinker
Michael Paquier wrote
> 
> A user knowing only the MD5 hash, and not the plain password would
> still be able to connect, so you really had better use SSL anyway if
> connecting with an untrusted network. Postgres 10 comes up with
> SCRAM-SHA-256 by the way, which is stronger by design for such things.

Hi, with untrusted network you mean eavesdropping or some other "evil"
technique?
With normal client like psql or pgAdmin is no way to log in having only md5
hash, right?



--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-docs-f2165602.html



Re: Add Pgfe library to client interfaces

2018-07-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 09:32:23AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun  1, 2018 at 05:56:34PM +0300, Dmitry Igrishin wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Could we please add Pgfe client library to the external interfaces section?
> > 
> > Patch is attached.
> 
> Is everyone good with adding this?  Is it too new?
> 
> Also libpqxx is listed in our docs as "New-style C++ interface".  Should
> we remove the "New" part?

I have removed the "New" description.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+  Ancient Roman grave inscription +



Re: Documented toolchain for building docs on Windows

2018-07-13 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 13 Jul 2018, at 10:09, Peter Eisentraut  
> wrote:
> 
> On 29.06.18 18:51, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 29 Jun 2018, at 15:08, Peter Eisentraut 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 6/28/18 13:19, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
 Unless someone steps up before 11 is rolled, maybe builddoc.pl should be 
 made
 into a exit immediately no-op since "nothing" is better than “broken”?
>>> 
>>> I'm thinking, just delete the file and the documentation section.
>> 
>> Well, that's a pretty decisive way to make it a no-op =) The attached patch
>> does that, along with a note in the relnotes to highlight the dropped support
>> which I think is warranted should we take this approach.
> 
> I have committed this to master now.  The scripts have already been
> broken since PG10, so mentioning it in the PG11 release notes doesn't
> seem appropriate.

Ok, that makes sense. Thanks!

cheers ./daniel