Re: [DOCS] No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs

2018-01-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:50:39AM +, steven.winfi...@cantabcapital.com 
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/textsearch-indexes.html
> Description:
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/textsearch-indexes.html
> 
> The last paragraph mentions the dblink module, but surely postgres_fdw
> deserves a mention here too - especially with its increasing ability to push
> more of the query onto the foreign servers.
> 
> Also, I think it would be worth mentioning elsewhere in the documentation
> (e.g. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/indexes-types.html) the
> impact that maintenance_work_mem has on the creation time for different
> index types - currently I can't find this anywhere else except on this FTS
> page.

I have applied the attached doc patch which will appear in PG 11. 
Thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+  Ancient Roman grave inscription +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/textsearch.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/textsearch.sgml
new file mode 100644
index 4dc52ec..1a2f040
*** a/doc/src/sgml/textsearch.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/textsearch.sgml
*** SELECT plainto_tsquery('supernovae stars
*** 3614,3621 
 allows the implementation of very fast searches with online update.
 Partitioning can be done at the database level using table inheritance,
 or by distributing documents over
!servers and collecting search results using the 
!module. The latter is possible because ranking functions use
 only local information.

  
--- 3614,3622 
 allows the implementation of very fast searches with online update.
 Partitioning can be done at the database level using table inheritance,
 or by distributing documents over
!servers and collecting external search results, e.g. via Foreign Data access.
!The latter is possible because ranking functions use
 only local information.

  


Re: [DOCS] hyperlink not valid

2018-01-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 01:18:34PM +, fournier...@gmail.com wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/logfile-maintenance.html
> Description:
> 
> In page
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/logfile-maintenance.html
> 
> Here under hyperlink is no more valid
> pgFouine
> http://pgfouine.projects.pgfoundry.org/

PG 9.2 is end-of-life now and this doesn't appear in any supported
version of our docs.  The URL was fixed in 2013:

commit f02b14f787980ac5b2f25407e5cd771e6b1a1dfc
Author: Peter Eisentraut 
Date:   Wed Jul 10 22:40:41 2013 -0400

doc: Replace link to pgFouine with pgBadger

From: Ian Lawrence Barwick 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+  Ancient Roman grave inscription +