Regarding built-in logical replication
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html Description: I am referring to link 'https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html' and it has been mentioned that 'Replicating between different major versions of PostgreSQL.' under the section of 'The typical use-cases for logical replication are:' but I don't think logical replication using PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION model is possible between different PostgreSQL versions, which is only possible using pglogical.
Re: [DOCS] Add JSON to the list of acronyms in the documentation's appendix
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:18:49PM +, torsten.gr...@gmail.com wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/acronyms.html > Description: > > Hello all, > > I propose to add 'JSON' (for JavaScript Object Notation, > http://json.org) to > the list of acronyms in the documentation's appendix > (https://www.postgresql.org/account/comments/new/10/acronyms.html/). Good idea. Patch applied --- it will appear in PG 11. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml new file mode 100644 index 6e9fddf..751c46d *** a/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml --- b/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml *** *** 370,375 --- 370,385 + JSON + + + http://json.org";>JavaScript Object Notation + + + + + LDAP
Re: [DOCS] Add JSON to the list of acronyms in the documentation's appendix
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:18:49PM +, torsten.gr...@gmail.com wrote: >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: >> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/acronyms.html >> Description: >> >> Hello all, >> >> I propose to add 'JSON' (for JavaScript Object Notation, >> http://json.org) to >> the list of acronyms in the documentation's appendix >> (https://www.postgresql.org/account/comments/new/10/acronyms.html/). > > Good idea. Patch applied --- it will appear in PG 11. Then, why not add JSONB ! > > -- > Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + > + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Re: [DOCS] Add JSON to the list of acronyms in the documentation's appendix
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 08:13:28PM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:18:49PM +, torsten.gr...@gmail.com wrote: > >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > >> > >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/acronyms.html > >> Description: > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >> I propose to add 'JSON' (for JavaScript Object Notation, > >> http://json.org) to > >> the list of acronyms in the documentation's appendix > >> (https://www.postgresql.org/account/comments/new/10/acronyms.html/). > > > > Good idea. Patch applied --- it will appear in PG 11. > > Then, why not add JSONB ! Uh, most of those acronyms are for _externally_ defined terms. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Re: Regarding built-in logical replication
On 1/11/18 09:48, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html > Description: > > I am referring to link > 'https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html' and it > has been mentioned that 'Replicating between different major versions of > PostgreSQL.' under the section of 'The typical use-cases for logical > replication are:' but I don't think logical replication using > PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION model is possible between different PostgreSQL > versions, which is only possible using pglogical. The documentation is correct. (The only caveat is that there are currently no other versions than 10 that have built-in logical replication, but if there were any, it would work.) -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Re: Regarding built-in logical replication
This means it would work with version 10 and its later versions. No backward compatibility is possible. Thanks for resolution. Ranjan Gajare On 12-Jan-2018 2:14 AM, "Peter Eisentraut" wrote: On 1/11/18 09:48, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html > Description: > > I am referring to link > 'https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html' and it > has been mentioned that 'Replicating between different major versions of > PostgreSQL.' under the section of 'The typical use-cases for logical > replication are:' but I don't think logical replication using > PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION model is possible between different PostgreSQL > versions, which is only possible using pglogical. The documentation is correct. (The only caveat is that there are currently no other versions than 10 that have built-in logical replication, but if there were any, it would work.) -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
