[BUGS] Apologies if you don't consider this a bug and I've wasted your time.

2004-08-27 Thread Steve Ingram


Hi,

I have a postgresql database that I have added postgis capabilities to.

When I pg_dump out the database, it outputs all the tables, functions, types
as you'd expect, but it outputs table definitions that reference postgis
functions/types *before* the functions/types themselves.

This means that when I restore the database on a different machine,
the table definitions complain because they don't know about the
types that are referenced further down the file.

I checked to see if I could force the pg_dump to be in a particular order,
but that doesn't seem possible (or I'm just blind :) )

I'm guessing the info is just coming out in OID order?

Of course, it may be an impossible task to do anything about this
and in my case I do have workarounds (not to mention I can edit the
file :) ), but I thought I'd mention it anyway.

Wonderful database by the way!

cheers

steve

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [BUGS] Apologies if you don't consider this a bug and I've wasted your time.

2004-08-29 Thread Steve Ingram
On Friday 27 August 2004 20:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Steve Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > When I pg_dump out the database, it outputs all the tables, functions,
> > types as you'd expect, but it outputs table definitions that reference
> > postgis functions/types *before* the functions/types themselves.
>
> Yeah, this is pretty likely if you did any ALTER TABLE or similar
> commands anywhere along the line. 

Duh! Of course!!

OK, this makes a lot more sense now and now I 
don't regard it as a bug ;)  I bet you are relieved :) :)

> The dump order is dependent on the 
> original creation order of the objects (tables, functions, etc) and so
> it's pretty easy to break it by adding columns or indexes to
> pre-existing tables.
>

Thats cool; I can make sure (I think) that doesn't happen,
and frankly, if a reload breaks, the fact that I am reloading *at all* is
pretty drastic, so I'll be happy to shift the contents to accommodate
any of the changes you mentioned.

> 8.0's pg_dump attempts to deal with this by paying attention to
> dependencies, but no earlier release does anything at all credible.
>
> FWIW, pg_restore does have options to alter the reload order, which
> may be an easier workaround than editing a textual dump.
>

And of course, I could have read ahead :)

Thanks for the explanation Tom

cheers

steve

>   regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend