[BUGS] BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken

2011-02-16 Thread Konrad Garus

The following bug has been logged online:

Bug reference:  5889
Logged by:  Konrad Garus
Email address:  konrad.ga...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4
Operating system:   Linux
Description:"Intersects" for polygons broken
Details: 

&& operator seems to be broken for polygons whose bounding boxes intersect:

select polygon'((0,0), (1,2), (0,2))' && polygon'((0.5, 0), (1,0), (1,1))';
 ?column? 
--
 t
(1 row)

It reportedly is different in 9.0
(http://stackoverflow.com/q/5015233/277683)

Docs could do better job explaining what types each of the geometry operator
supports, and whether intersecting polygons support nonconvex polygons as
well, or only uses bounding box as criteria.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs


Re: [BUGS] BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken

2011-02-16 Thread Konrad Garus
2011/2/16 Tom Lane :
> "Konrad Garus"  writes:
>> && operator seems to be broken for polygons whose bounding boxes intersect:
>
>> select polygon'((0,0), (1,2), (0,2))' && polygon'((0.5, 0), (1,0), (1,1))';
>>  ?column?
>> --
>>  t
>> (1 row)
>
> This is fixed as of 9.0; see the release notes at
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/release-9-0.html
> which say
>
>        Correct calculations of "overlaps" and "contains" operations for 
> polygons (Teodor Sigaev)
>
>        The polygon && (overlaps) operator formerly just checked to see
>        if the two polygons' bounding boxes overlapped. It now does a
>        more correct check. The polygon @> and <@ (contains/contained
>        by) operators formerly checked to see if one polygon's vertexes
>        were all contained in the other; this can wrongly report "true"
>        for some non-convex polygons. Now they check that all line
>        segments of one polygon are contained in the other.

Thank you. How about the point of more informative docs that would
explain supported types, automatic conversions and all such caveats
(also for 8.3 and 8.4)?

-- 
Konrad Garus

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs


Re: [BUGS] BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken

2011-03-08 Thread Konrad Garus
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-geometry.html

I wish it explained what arguments each of the operators accepts, and
whether any automatic conversions take place (like polygon to box in
that 8.3 issue).

What happens when I call ?# or ?- on a polygon and point? Two points? Open path?

Some of these are obvious, but others not so much.

2011/3/8 Robert Haas :
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Konrad Garus  wrote:
>> 2011/2/16 Tom Lane :
>>> "Konrad Garus"  writes:
>>>> && operator seems to be broken for polygons whose bounding boxes intersect:
>>>
>>>> select polygon'((0,0), (1,2), (0,2))' && polygon'((0.5, 0), (1,0), (1,1))';
>>>>  ?column?
>>>> --
>>>>  t
>>>> (1 row)
>>>
>>> This is fixed as of 9.0; see the release notes at
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/release-9-0.html
>>> which say
>>>
>>>        Correct calculations of "overlaps" and "contains" operations for 
>>> polygons (Teodor Sigaev)
>>>
>>>        The polygon && (overlaps) operator formerly just checked to see
>>>        if the two polygons' bounding boxes overlapped. It now does a
>>>        more correct check. The polygon @> and <@ (contains/contained
>>>        by) operators formerly checked to see if one polygon's vertexes
>>>        were all contained in the other; this can wrongly report "true"
>>>        for some non-convex polygons. Now they check that all line
>>>        segments of one polygon are contained in the other.
>>
>> Thank you. How about the point of more informative docs that would
>> explain supported types, automatic conversions and all such caveats
>> (also for 8.3 and 8.4)?
>
> I think a lot of these things are already documented.  Aren't they?
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>



-- 
Konrad Garus

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs