[BUGS] BUG #4675: FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory

2009-02-24 Thread

The following bug has been logged online:

Bug reference:  4675
Logged by:  
Email address:  ko...@wp.pl
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.11
Operating system:   Windows Vista
Description:FATAL:  could not reattach to shared memory
Details: 

After I have installed Postgresql 8.2.11 on windows vista I have this
entries in my log

LOG:  unrecognized win32 error code: 487

FATAL:  could not reattach to shared memory (key=5432001, addr=0220):
Invalid argument

What is this? How can I repair this?

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs


Re: [BUGS] BUG #4675: FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory

2009-02-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
ko...@wp.pl wrote:
> 
> The following bug has been logged online:
> 
> Bug reference:  4675
> Logged by:  
> Email address:  ko...@wp.pl
> PostgreSQL version: 8.2.11
> Operating system:   Windows Vista
> Description:FATAL:  could not reattach to shared memory
> Details: 
> 
> After I have installed Postgresql 8.2.11 on windows vista I have this
> entries in my log
> 
> LOG:  unrecognized win32 error code: 487
> 
> FATAL:  could not reattach to shared memory (key=5432001, addr=0220):
> Invalid argument
> 
> What is this? How can I repair this?

Our TODO list has this:

Diagnose problem where shared memory can sometimes not be attached by
postmaster children

* FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32) 
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-08/msg01377.php

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs


Re: [BUGS] BUG #4674: Unable to open lob

2009-02-24 Thread Tom Lane
"Yuichi Tanaka"  writes:
> This program displays "error: second lo_open".

Where did you get the oid value from?  What makes you think that one
more than that oid is also a large object?

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs