Perl6::Doc # Hail to the new pharao
Hereby I declare myself as the Pharao of the Perl 6 Documentation. My first sign of regence will be most probably tomorrow the release the initial stable release of http://search.cpan.org/~lichtkind/Perl6-Doc/ this is a perly command line tool to read perl 6 related documentation. The code was actually made by Ingy döt net since this is just an updated version of Perl6::Bible which will hereby depreciated. It contains the newest version of the Synopses, Apocalypses and Exegesis, like Perl6::Bible did, plus the more usefull docs from the Pugs repository including the tutorial. I have also plans to add my perl article (once they transelated) for $foo perl magazine and maybe some perl.com articles, if chomatic allowes. I plan also include my wiki styled tutorial that i began to translate these days, as you can see under http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.cgi?perl_table Yes i renamed it perl tables, to avoid namespace collision with the already started perl tutorial in pugs SVN, and also because its a much nicer and more descriptive name of what it does. its a table like summary of all perl 6 feature, so well ordered and with some aditional explaining text, so you can always find quickly if you look for something. its also a reference to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerald_Tablet which contained all the wisdom people of ancient times had. so it should perl tables contain all wisdom about perl. As always everybody is invited, blessfull holidays end of communication
Re: Perl6::Doc # Hail to the new pharao
On Friday 28 December 2007 17:04:40 herbert breunung wrote: > I have also plans to add my perl article (once they transelated) for $foo > perl magazine and maybe some perl.com articles, if chomatic allowes. It's fine with O'Reilly, as long as the authors of the articles agree (they hold the copyright). Where I'm the author, you have my permission. O'Reilly generally asks that you include a link to the original article as published on our site, but that's a request and not a requirement. -- c
Re: Perl6::Doc # Hail to the new pharao
thanks to chromatic, so i have ask Jonathan Scott Duff, Phil Crow and wait for /Adrianos answer. what i yesterday also forgot to mention is that rumor says that the emerald tables are designed to can provide answer for people on over 100 different levels of consciousness. to teach the newbeees the simpel stuff and simultaniously the Damians , last bits is what really describes the goal of my perl tables / On Friday 28 December 2007 17:04:40 herbert breunung wrote: I have also plans to add my perl article (once they transelated) for $foo perl magazine and maybe some perl.com articles, if chomatic allowes. It's fine with O'Reilly, as long as the authors of the articles agree (they hold the copyright). Where I'm the author, you have my permission. O'Reilly generally asks that you include a link to the original article as published on our site, but that's a request and not a requirement. -- c
Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis
.cgi? Is that really a CGI-based implementation? Because that seems a little, I don't know, backward-looking. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl is for CGI scripts, and "real" web apps need to be written in something else (be it Java, PHP, Ruby/Rails, whatever). Besides, I hope that the language and wiki will be successful enough that a cgi-based implementation will completely fail to scale to meet demand. :) On 12/29/07, Conrad Schneiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those who didn't know (or didn't recognize the links), these are the > URLs for the official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis: > > http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.cgi > > http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi > > Contributions of content are of course always welcome. > > Please consider linking to these wikis where appropriate, to help raise > their visibility and utility. > > (Also consider dropping a note to perl6-users about major wiki updates of > general interest to Perl 6 test drivers and fans.) > > FYI, there's also an official Perl 5 wiki. > > http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi > > Best regards, > Conrad Schneiker > > www.AthenaLab.com > > > > -- Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis
On Dec 29, 2007 4:56 PM, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > .cgi? Is that really a CGI-based implementation? Because that seems > a little, I don't know, backward-looking. Maybe it's just me, but it > seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl > is for CGI scripts, and "real" web apps need to be written in > something else (be it Java, PHP, Ruby/Rails, whatever). > > Besides, I hope that the language and wiki will be successful enough > that a cgi-based implementation will completely fail to scale to meet > demand. :) Maybe the site maintainers could add an Apache rewrite rule so the URLs used by the public will be http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.p6 and http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.parrot That would change the perception and we would not need to explain about mod_perl running the .cgi scripts at the rate 100-200 faster than good old CGI. When asked if they really run on Perl 6 and Parrot we could just smile... Gabor
Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis
On Saturday 29 December 2007 06:56:45 Mark J. Reed wrote: > Maybe it's just me, but it > seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl > is for CGI scripts, and "real" web apps need to be written in > something else (be it Java, PHP, Ruby/Rails, whatever). Proposed new rule: for every ten contributions to the wiki, you get one bikeshed mail. -- c
Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis
Ok, consider me duly chastised. Sorry for the sidetracking. On 12/29/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 29 December 2007 06:56:45 Mark J. Reed wrote: > > > Maybe it's just me, but it > > seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl > > is for CGI scripts, and "real" web apps need to be written in > > something else (be it Java, PHP, Ruby/Rails, whatever). > > Proposed new rule: for every ten contributions to the wiki, you get one > bikeshed mail. > > -- c > -- Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis
On Saturday 29 December 2007 13:35:00 Mark J. Reed wrote: > Ok, consider me duly chastised. Sorry for the sidetracking. It's not a *bad* idea, but it's less important in my mind than getting useful information on the wiki. Anyone who wants to pursue it can do so, but I'd like to forestall a long digression on the list about it. That's all. -- c
Re: Perl6::Doc # Hail to the new pharao
You have my permission as well. -Scott On Dec 29, 2007 7:04 AM, herbert breunung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks to chromatic, so i have ask Jonathan Scott Duff, Phil Crow and > wait for /Adrianos answer. > > what i yesterday also forgot to mention is that rumor says that the > emerald tables > are designed to can provide answer for people on over 100 different > levels of consciousness. > to teach the newbeees the simpel stuff and simultaniously the Damians , > last bits is what > really describes the goal of my perl tables > > / > > On Friday 28 December 2007 17:04:40 herbert breunung wrote: > > > > > >> I have also plans to add my perl article (once they transelated) for > $foo > >> perl magazine and maybe some perl.com articles, if chomatic allowes. > >> > > > > It's fine with O'Reilly, as long as the authors of the articles agree > (they > > hold the copyright). Where I'm the author, you have my permission. > > > > O'Reilly generally asks that you include a link to the original article > as > > published on our site, but that's a request and not a requirement. > > > > -- c > > > > > > -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiline comments in Perl6
Hello list, i don't know the actually state in the discussion about multiline comments, but i would propose an idea.. a combination of POD's = and the traditional route char... =# this is a multi line comment #= =# comment #= this is not commented What you think about it? regards Christian
