[OpenStack-Infra] Fwd: IBM DB2 CI spam alot

[yan fengxi]

Hi, everyone. The annoying problem is now resolved. But I found the DB2 CI
account was already disabled.
We need to get it enabled, so that we could test if our solution works, and
we will not publish any results to community until then.

@*Anita Kuno, would you please help on this?*


-- Forwarded message --
From: yan fengxi 
Date: Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM
Subject: IBM DB2 CI spam alot
To: s...@dague.net
Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org, yanfen...@cn.ibm.com,
good...@gmail.com


Hi, Sean, I am the DB2 CI maintainer "yanfengxi". Thanks for reminding us
this problem. It is indeed annoying to see merge failures.
Now our team is trying to resolv this problem, by stopping to publish this
kind of failures. Before it's resolved, our DB2 CI will not publish result
to community.

Actually, not long ago, we met merge failure errors. We configured our zuul
to stop publishing "Merge failure" errors on specific patch. But we were
not aware that patches that depends on the failed patch will also publish
merge failures.

Cheers
Feng Xi Yan(yanfen...@cn.ibm.com)

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Sean Dague http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra>>
wrote:
>* The IBM DB2 CI seems to be running a Zuul, and seems to be reporting
*>* back on merge conflicts a lot in completely unhelpful ways -
*>* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188148/

*>>* It seems like no 3rd party CI should be sending merge conflict messages
*>* to gerrit. This is my formal complaint on that front, and I'd like the
*>* CI system turned off if it's not fixed in the near term.
*>>* -Sean
*>>* --
*>* Sean Dague
*>* http://dague.net 
*>>* ___
*>* OpenStack-Infra mailing list
*>* OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org

*>* http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
*
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] IBM DB2 CI spam alot

[Sean Dague]

On 06/10/2015 06:05 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> I think its fine for you to not want merge conflict messages from
> third party CI systems, but I do think we need to note that many of
> them do this now -- turbo hipster for example. If we turn off that
> message, then those CI systems will silently fail and we will need to
> be better at noticing that they've stopped working.
> 
> The merge failure messages are only really a problem for misconfigured
> CI systems. Isn't turning it off for everyone an over-reaction
> compared to the problem?

I had already sent out the message privately, it had been ignored. So I
put it here publicly as apparently it's the only way to get the team to
respond. I actually hadn't intended this to be an immediate kill: "off
if it's *not* fixed in the near term."

This actually caused a great deal of confusion when addressing a cross
repo patch series recently. Hence my annoyance and reporting.

-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Fwd: IBM DB2 CI spam alot

[Anita Kuno]

On 06/11/2015 05:09 AM, yan fengxi wrote:
> Hi, everyone. The annoying problem is now resolved. But I found the DB2 CI
> account was already disabled.
> We need to get it enabled, so that we could test if our solution works, and
> we will not publish any results to community until then.
> 
> @*Anita Kuno, would you please help on this?*

If Sean agrees this is satisfactory, then yes, I can support your system
being re-enabled.

Thank you,
Anita.
> 
> 
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: yan fengxi 
> Date: Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM
> Subject: IBM DB2 CI spam alot
> To: s...@dague.net
> Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org, yanfen...@cn.ibm.com,
> good...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> Hi, Sean, I am the DB2 CI maintainer "yanfengxi". Thanks for reminding us
> this problem. It is indeed annoying to see merge failures.
> Now our team is trying to resolv this problem, by stopping to publish this
> kind of failures. Before it's resolved, our DB2 CI will not publish result
> to community.
> 
> Actually, not long ago, we met merge failure errors. We configured our zuul
> to stop publishing "Merge failure" errors on specific patch. But we were
> not aware that patches that depends on the failed patch will also publish
> merge failures.
> 
> Cheers
> Feng Xi Yan(yanfen...@cn.ibm.com)
> 
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Sean Dague  >
> wrote:
>> * The IBM DB2 CI seems to be running a Zuul, and seems to be reporting
> *>* back on merge conflicts a lot in completely unhelpful ways -
> *>* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188148/
> 
> *>>* It seems like no 3rd party CI should be sending merge conflict messages
> *>* to gerrit. This is my formal complaint on that front, and I'd like the
> *>* CI system turned off if it's not fixed in the near term.
> *>>* -Sean
> *>>* --
> *>* Sean Dague
> *>* http://dague.net 
> *>>* ___
> *>* OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> *>* OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> 
> *>* http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> *
> 


___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Fwd: IBM DB2 CI spam alot

[Sean Dague]

On 06/11/2015 10:02 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 06/11/2015 05:09 AM, yan fengxi wrote:
>> Hi, everyone. The annoying problem is now resolved. But I found the DB2 CI
>> account was already disabled.
>> We need to get it enabled, so that we could test if our solution works, and
>> we will not publish any results to community until then.
>>
>> @*Anita Kuno, would you please help on this?*
> 
> If Sean agrees this is satisfactory, then yes, I can support your system
> being re-enabled.

Yes, sounds fine.

> 
> Thank you,
> Anita.
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: yan fengxi 
>> Date: Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM
>> Subject: IBM DB2 CI spam alot
>> To: s...@dague.net
>> Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org, yanfen...@cn.ibm.com,
>> good...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Hi, Sean, I am the DB2 CI maintainer "yanfengxi". Thanks for reminding us
>> this problem. It is indeed annoying to see merge failures.
>> Now our team is trying to resolv this problem, by stopping to publish this
>> kind of failures. Before it's resolved, our DB2 CI will not publish result
>> to community.
>>
>> Actually, not long ago, we met merge failure errors. We configured our zuul
>> to stop publishing "Merge failure" errors on specific patch. But we were
>> not aware that patches that depends on the failed patch will also publish
>> merge failures.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Feng Xi Yan(yanfen...@cn.ibm.com)
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Sean Dague > >
>> wrote:
>>> * The IBM DB2 CI seems to be running a Zuul, and seems to be reporting
>> *>* back on merge conflicts a lot in completely unhelpful ways -
>> *>* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188148/
>> 
>> *>>* It seems like no 3rd party CI should be sending merge conflict messages
>> *>* to gerrit. This is my formal complaint on that front, and I'd like the
>> *>* CI system turned off if it's not fixed in the near term.
>> *>>* -Sean
>> *>>* --
>> *>* Sean Dague
>> *>* http://dague.net 
>> *>>* ___
>> *>* OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> *>* OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
>> 
>> *>* http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>> *
>>
> 


-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Fwd: IBM DB2 CI spam alot

[Anita Kuno]

On 06/11/2015 10:14 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 06/11/2015 10:02 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 06/11/2015 05:09 AM, yan fengxi wrote:
>>> Hi, everyone. The annoying problem is now resolved. But I found the DB2 CI
>>> account was already disabled.
>>> We need to get it enabled, so that we could test if our solution works, and
>>> we will not publish any results to community until then.
>>>
>>> @*Anita Kuno, would you please help on this?*
>>
>> If Sean agrees this is satisfactory, then yes, I can support your system
>> being re-enabled.
> 
> Yes, sounds fine.

Thank you, Sean.

Yan Fengxi, your gerrit account is re-enabled. I suggest following up
with Sean on irc (sdague) after you begin commenting again to ensure
what you are posting is inline with expectations.

Thank you,
Anita.

> 
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Anita.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: yan fengxi 
>>> Date: Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM
>>> Subject: IBM DB2 CI spam alot
>>> To: s...@dague.net
>>> Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org, yanfen...@cn.ibm.com,
>>> good...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi, Sean, I am the DB2 CI maintainer "yanfengxi". Thanks for reminding us
>>> this problem. It is indeed annoying to see merge failures.
>>> Now our team is trying to resolv this problem, by stopping to publish this
>>> kind of failures. Before it's resolved, our DB2 CI will not publish result
>>> to community.
>>>
>>> Actually, not long ago, we met merge failure errors. We configured our zuul
>>> to stop publishing "Merge failure" errors on specific patch. But we were
>>> not aware that patches that depends on the failed patch will also publish
>>> merge failures.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Feng Xi Yan(yanfen...@cn.ibm.com)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Sean Dague >> >
>>> wrote:
 * The IBM DB2 CI seems to be running a Zuul, and seems to be reporting
>>> *>* back on merge conflicts a lot in completely unhelpful ways -
>>> *>* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188148/
>>> 
>>> *>>* It seems like no 3rd party CI should be sending merge conflict messages
>>> *>* to gerrit. This is my formal complaint on that front, and I'd like the
>>> *>* CI system turned off if it's not fixed in the near term.
>>> *>>* -Sean
>>> *>>* --
>>> *>* Sean Dague
>>> *>* http://dague.net 
>>> *>>* ___
>>> *>* OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>>> *>* OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
>>> 
>>> *>* http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>> *
>>>
>>
> 
> 


___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] removing branches

[Jeremy Stanley]

On 2015-06-10 20:33:46 -0700 (-0700), sean roberts wrote:
> I need to have stackforge/akanda-rug, stackforge/akanda-neutron
> stable/juno branches removed.
> 
> Let me know if you need more information.

As requested, I have removed the following branches:

stackforge/akanda-neutron stable/juno (tip was 41cccda)
stackforge/akanda-rug stable/juno (tip was 055f478)

Let us know if you need any additional assistance.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] removing branches

[sean roberts]

That's it. Thanks!

On Thursday, June 11, 2015, Jeremy Stanley  wrote:

> On 2015-06-10 20:33:46 -0700 (-0700), sean roberts wrote:
> > I need to have stackforge/akanda-rug, stackforge/akanda-neutron
> > stable/juno branches removed.
> >
> > Let me know if you need more information.
>
> As requested, I have removed the following branches:
>
> stackforge/akanda-neutron stable/juno (tip was 41cccda)
> stackforge/akanda-rug stable/juno (tip was 055f478)
>
> Let us know if you need any additional assistance.
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>


-- 
~sean
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

[OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev][cinder] Request for re-integration of Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver

[Diem Tran]

Dear Cinder team,

Sorry if this message appears duplicated to you. I'd like to kindly 
request re-integration of Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Cinder driver to 2 
branches: master and stable/kilo:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178319

The iSCSI CI has been working stably since 6/8, and the patchset is 
ready to be reviewed. The complete reports list can be found here:

https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z

Please let me know if you have any question.

Thanks,
Diem.





___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

[OpenStack-Infra] Nominating Joshua Hesketh for infra-root

[James E. Blair]

The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure:
contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability
on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with
administrative access).  Read all about it here:

  http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/project.html#teams

Joshua has been a valuable member of infra-core for some time, having a
high degree of familiarity with Zuul and related systems and an
increasing interest in other operational aspects of the project
infrastructure.  His eagerness to contribute is presently tempered by
most of the infra-root team sleeping[1] during large parts of his day.
I look forward to Joshua being able to approve changes with confidence.

Joshua, if you are interested, please propose your SSH key to
system-config, and thanks again for all of your work!

-Jim
[1] contrary to widely-held belief, this does happen

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] prioritizing reviews

[Vinay Mahuli]

I can see that the version of zuul which we are using supports "promote".
We are using Zuul version: 2.0.0.366.ge1fe0ef

root@zuul:~# /usr/local/bin/zuul --help
usage: zuul [-h] [-c CONFIG] [-v] [--version] {enqueue,promote,show} ...

Zuul Project Gating System Client.

optional arguments:
  -h, --helpshow this help message and exit
  -c CONFIG specify the config file
  -vverbose output
  --version show zuul version

commands:
  valid commands

  {enqueue,promote,show}
additional help
enqueue enqueue a change
promote promote one or more changes
showvalid show subcommands

Regards,
Vinay

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Jeremy Stanley  wrote:

> On 2015-06-10 19:18:58 + (+), Octavian Ciuhandu wrote:
> > > On 9 Jun 2015, at 21:40, Vinay Mahuli  wrote:
> > >
> > > So, I believe that we cannot prioritize a review in gerrit at
> > > the moment. Is my understanding correct?
> > >
> > Did you install zuul from pip or from the master branch of the git
> > repo [1]?
> >
> > Only the install from the git repo supports as option “promote”
> > and it can be used for your needs.
> [...]
>
> The current version on PyPI supports the 'zuul promote' CLI
> subcommand, but prior versions (2.0.0 and earlier) did not.
>
> This has nothing to do with whether Gerrit supports review
> priorities (it does not, yet anyway) but I see from the earlier
> messages in the thread that Vinay Mahuli may have been getting the
> names of these services confused.
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>



-- 
Regards,
Vinay
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] prioritizing reviews

[Vinay Mahuli]

We are using 2.0.0.366. So it should support?

root@zuul:~# /usr/local/bin/zuul --version
Zuul version: 2.0.0.366.ge1fe0ef

root@zuul:~# /usr/local/bin/zuul --help
usage: zuul [-h] [-c CONFIG] [-v] [--version] {enqueue,promote,show} ...

Zuul Project Gating System Client.

optional arguments:
  -h, --helpshow this help message and exit
  -c CONFIG specify the config file
  -vverbose output
  --version show zuul version

commands:
  valid commands

  {enqueue,promote,show}
additional help
enqueue enqueue a change
promote promote one or more changes
showvalid show subcommands

Regards,
Vinay

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Octavian Ciuhandu <
ociuha...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrote:

> Hi Vinay,
>
> Did you install zuul from pip or from the master branch of the git repo
> [1]?
>
> Only the install from the git repo supports as option “promote” and it can
> be used for your needs.
>
> In order to check if your install supports this option, try a “zuul —help”
> and check the list of “valid commands”. The correct list should be “
> {enqueue,promote,show}”
>
> Regards,
>
> Octavian.
>
> [1] https://github.com/openstack-infra/zuul
>
>
> On 9 Jun 2015, at 21:40, Vinay Mahuli  wrote:
>
> So, I believe that we cannot prioritize a review in gerrit at the moment.
> Is my understanding correct?
>
> Regards,
> Vinay
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Vinay Mahuli  wrote:
>
>> Does any one know how to prioritize reviews in gerrit?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vinay
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Vinay Mahuli  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have a similar gerrit, zuul and jenkins setup as review.openstack.org
>>> .
>>>
>>> At times, we would like to prioritize certain reviews which are critical
>>> and of high importance due to release timelines.
>>> ​
>>> ​
>>> I don't see an option to prioritize reviews in zuul.
>>> ​All the reviews will be queued up in zuul and will be processed one
>>> after the other.
>>>
>>> Do we have a option to prioritize required reviews in zuul?
>>> Any inputs would be of great help.
>>> ​
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Vinay
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Vinay
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Vinay
>  ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Vinay
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Nominating Joshua Hesketh for infra-root

[Joshua Hesketh]

Thanks all. I promise to not break things too much!

Cheers,
Josh

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:54 AM, James E. Blair  wrote:
> The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure:
> contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability
> on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with
> administrative access).  Read all about it here:
>
>   http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/project.html#teams
>
> Joshua has been a valuable member of infra-core for some time, having a
> high degree of familiarity with Zuul and related systems and an
> increasing interest in other operational aspects of the project
> infrastructure.  His eagerness to contribute is presently tempered by
> most of the infra-root team sleeping[1] during large parts of his day.
> I look forward to Joshua being able to approve changes with confidence.
>
> Joshua, if you are interested, please propose your SSH key to
> system-config, and thanks again for all of your work!
>
> -Jim
> [1] contrary to widely-held belief, this does happen
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] DB2 CI is enabled

[yan fengxi]

>
> Hi, Sean,
>
I've tested the DB2 CI on your patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188148/, and it worked fine, it did not
publish that annoying merge failures any more.
As you are not online in irc, I will take a risk to enable publishing of
DB2 CI. If there are problems, please reach me any time via mailing-list or
my private email: yanfen...@cn.ibm.com.

@Anita Kuno, thanks for you support on this :)

>
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:20:29 -0400
> From: Anita Kuno 
> To: Sean Dague , yan fengxi ,
> openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org,  "Announcements for Third
> Party
> CI Operators." 
> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Fwd: IBM DB2 CI spam alot
> Message-ID: <5579992d.60...@anteaya.info>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> On 06/11/2015 10:14 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> > On 06/11/2015 10:02 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> >> On 06/11/2015 05:09 AM, yan fengxi wrote:
> >>> Hi, everyone. The annoying problem is now resolved. But I found the
> DB2 CI
> >>> account was already disabled.
> >>> We need to get it enabled, so that we could test if our solution
> works, and
> >>> we will not publish any results to community until then.
> >>>
> >>> @*Anita Kuno, would you please help on this?*
> >>
> >> If Sean agrees this is satisfactory, then yes, I can support your system
> >> being re-enabled.
> >
> > Yes, sounds fine.
>
> Thank you, Sean.
>
> Yan Fengxi, your gerrit account is re-enabled. I suggest following up
> with Sean on irc (sdague) after you begin commenting again to ensure
> what you are posting is inline with expectations.
>
> Thank you,
> Anita.
>
> >
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Anita.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -- Forwarded message --
> >>> From: yan fengxi 
> >>> Date: Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM
> >>> Subject: IBM DB2 CI spam alot
> >>> To: s...@dague.net
> >>> Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org, yanfen...@cn.ibm.com,
> >>> good...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi, Sean, I am the DB2 CI maintainer "yanfengxi". Thanks for reminding
> us
> >>> this problem. It is indeed annoying to see merge failures.
> >>> Now our team is trying to resolv this problem, by stopping to publish
> this
> >>> kind of failures. Before it's resolved, our DB2 CI will not publish
> result
> >>> to community.
> >>>
> >>> Actually, not long ago, we met merge failure errors. We configured our
> zuul
> >>> to stop publishing "Merge failure" errors on specific patch. But we
> were
> >>> not aware that patches that depends on the failed patch will also
> publish
> >>> merge failures.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Feng Xi Yan(yanfen...@cn.ibm.com)
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Sean Dague  >>> >
> >>> wrote:
>  * The IBM DB2 CI seems to be running a Zuul, and seems to be reporting
> >>> *>* back on merge conflicts a lot in completely unhelpful ways -
> >>> *>* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188148/
> >>> 
> >>> *>>* It seems like no 3rd party CI should be sending merge conflict
> messages
> >>> *>* to gerrit. This is my formal complaint on that front, and I'd like
> the
> >>> *>* CI system turned off if it's not fixed in the near term.
> >>> *>>* -Sean
> >>> *>>* --
> >>> *>* Sean Dague
> >>> *>* http://dague.net 
> >>> *>>* ___
> >>> *>* OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> >>> *>* OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> >>> 
> >>> *>*
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> >>> *
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Nominating Joshua Hesketh for infra-root

[Jeremy Stanley]

On 2015-06-12 12:42:11 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote:
> Thanks all. I promise to not break things too much!

All I ask is that you fix whatever you've broken by the time I wake
up. ;)
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra