Re: [Openstack] Allocating dynamic IP to the VMs

2013-03-24 Thread Chathura M. Sarathchandra Magurawalage 
Thanks Sylvain,

I have tried this, but does not seem to work. I can allocate the floating
ip to the VM but it is not accessible from the physical network. I can not
ping to it from the controller or any other physical nodes.

Any idea?

On 19 March 2013 16:14, Sylvain Bauza  wrote:

>  As per
> http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-network/admin/content/demo_logical_network_config.htmlbut
>  slightly modified as per CLI help,
>
> quantum net-create ext_net --tenant-id $TENANT_ID --router:external=True
> quantum subnet-create --ip_version 4 --allocation-pool 
> start=192.168.2.151,end=192.168.2.240 \
>  --gateway 192.168.2.253  192.168.2.0/24 -- --enable_dhcp=False
>
>
> It will create ext_net subnet with preallocated IP range. For each VM,
> allocate floating IP from this pool and then associate it with the internal
> port.
>
> Hope it can helps,
> -Sylvain
>
> Le 19/03/2013 13:44, Chathura M. Sarathchandra Magurawalage a écrit :
>
> Thanks.
>
>  its 192.168.2.0/24
>
>  free ip range: 192.168.2.151 192.168.2.240
>
>  gw/dhcp server: 192.168.2.253
>
>
> On 19 March 2013 08:28, Sylvain Bauza  wrote:
>
>>  In that case, please refer to my previous e-mail : use floating IPs
>> bound to the same physical network.
>> That's up to you to know which IP pools are available inside your
>> network. Once you get one, create a external Quantum subnet defined with
>> this IP range.
>>
>> Sorry, I have feeling to explain again and again. If you still don't
>> catch the point, could you please then tell me your physical net/CIDR, your
>> free IP range and your gateway, and I'll mix you up the command to issue.
>>
>> -Sylvain
>>
>> Le 18/03/2013 18:02, Chathura M. Sarathchandra Magurawalage a écrit :
>>
>>  Thanks Sylvain,
>>
>>  There must be a way of doing this without having to do anything with my
>> default gateway of my physical network? . Even if I have to I do not wan to
>> do anything to the physical gateway. All I need is a way to let the VMs get
>> a dynamic IP from the physical network. How can I do this. For example this
>> can be done on virtual box using a bridge adapter which maps the VM in to
>> the physical network.
>>
>> On 18 March 2013 16:05, Sylvain Bauza  wrote:
>>
>>>  Could you please tell me your "physical network" CIDR ?
>>> Anyway, what you need is not requiring having a floating IP pool inside
>>> the same network, you can also play with static routing : if your physical
>>> host does have a default gw, you can create a static route from this gw to
>>> the VM network gateway. And on the VM network gateway, do the same...
>>>
>>> -Sylvain
>>>
>>> Le 18/03/2013 16:53, Chathura M. Sarathchandra Magurawalage a écrit :
>>>
>>>   Hey Sylvain,
>>>
>>>  Basically what I need is to have the VMs mapped to my physical network
>>> so that my physical hosts can directly access the VMs. How can I do this?
>>>
>>>  Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18 March 2013 15:50, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>>>
  Hi,

 I don't understand your business. Should you have a 192.168.1.0/24network 
 for management, you could also assign an external network with
 Quantum based on the same subnet (ie. 192.168.1.0/24).
 When creating a floating IP pool, Quantum does require at least 3
 things :
  - the CIDR
  - the beginning and ending IPs
  - the external gateway

 So, based on what I previously said, you only need to create a
 192.168.1.0/24 in Quantum with .1-.100 (for example) as the range,
 .254 being the external gateway.

 Thanks,
 -Sylvain

 Le 18/03/2013 16:29, Chathura M. Sarathchandra Magurawalage a écrit :

  anyone?

 On 17 March 2013 21:33, Chathura M. Sarathchandra Magurawalage <
 77.chath...@gmail.com> wrote:

> After reading a little bit more, I think I have found what I need. It
> is  a provider network that I need for the VMs so that they can get access
> to the other resources in my main network ( such as other physical hosts
> that are connected to the same network ).
>
>  My question is, is it possible to do this alongside the use case
> that I have followed ( Provider router with private networks)?
>
>  If so how can I do this?
>
>  Thanks.
>
>
>   On 16 March 2013 01:46, Chathura M. Sarathchandra Magurawalage <
> 77.chath...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hello,
>>
>>  I want to know how I can allocate a dynamic IP to the VM from the
>> same network as the openstack hosts (controller/network-node/compute 
>> node)
>> network/management network . For example, in virtual box you can give 
>> your
>> VM an IP from the host's network using a Bridge adapter. How can I do 
>> this
>> in openstack?
>>
>>  From what I understand floating IP's are used when you have a
>> public IP
>>  (which is static) to be allocated to VM's.
>>
>> My openstack installation architecture:
>>
>> http://docs.openstack.or

Re: [Openstack] Project quotas on multi-region

2013-03-24 Thread Tim Bell 
 

The Boson project was looking at this sort of problem
(https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Boson).

 

There is a session at the summit to review this and other activities since
it appears quotas are appearing in many projects and there is a clear need
for multi-cell and quota delegation (i.e. domain quota manager gives
sub-sections to project quota managers). This sort of function is quite
complex to implement and consistency of implementation would be strongly
desirable.

 

Tim

 

From: openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Nathanael Burton
Sent: 24 March 2013 02:31
To: Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil R&D-ECL)
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Project quotas on multi-region

 

On Mar 23, 2013 7:59 PM, "Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil R&D-ECL)"
mailto:glaucimar.agu...@hp.com> > wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In a deployment scenario where one keystone has several regions
registered, how the project quota are managed by, as an example, two nova
services in two different regions?
> I am wondering if is it possible to set quota on the project for all
regions or this must to be done on a region by region basis which really
means a quota for a project in a region.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Glaucimar Aguiar
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Glaucimar,

Currently quotas are maintained within each nova system so there is not a
global view/management/enforcement of quotas. I would love to see a
discussion of centralizing things from nova like key pairs, AZs, and quotas
in keystone.

Thanks,

Nate



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack] OpenStack for begginers event

2013-03-24 Thread Luis Gervaso 
Hi folks,

I want to share the slides I prepared for the OpenStack for begginers event

http://www.slideshare.net/LuisGervaso/openstack-2013-1

These are based in OpenStack 2013.1 testing repository

Cheers!

-- 
---
Luis Alberto Gervaso Martin
Woorea Solutions, S.L
CEO & CTO
mobile: (+34) 627983344
luis@ woorea.es
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Project quotas on multi-region

2013-03-24 Thread Jay Pipes 
On 03/23/2013 09:31 PM, Nathanael Burton wrote:
> Glaucimar,
> 
> Currently quotas are maintained within each nova system so there is not
> a global view/management/enforcement of quotas. I would love to see a
> discussion of centralizing things from nova like key pairs, AZs, and
> quotas in keystone.

+100

See my summit proposal to bring availability zone and region management
under Keystone:

http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/114

-jay

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] TC candidacy

2013-03-24 Thread balaji patnala 
+1

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Monty Taylor  wrote:

> I confirm that Vishvananda is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
>
> On 03/15/2013 05:41 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I would like to run for a seat on The Technical Comittee. I have been
> working on Nova since it was a project as Nasa and I have been heavily
> involved in openstack since it was founded. I was elected to the precursor
> to TC (the Project Oversight Committee, later named the Project Policy
> Board) when it was first created.
> >
> > I was also elected as the first PTL for Nova and have been filling that
> role for the last two years. I am the top contributor to Nova over the
> lifetime of the project, and the third most frequent contributor over the
> past 12 months. I helped to create Devstack, Keystone, and Cinder. In
> addition, I have contributed to Oslo and I am a member of the
> stable-maintenance team.
> >
> > Despite passing on the mantle of Nova PTL, I am still deeply involved
> with OpenStack and I want to make sure that it continues to be a huge
> success. As OpenStack grows, one of the most important challenges we face
> is integration. It is vital that we have technical leaders that are focused
> cross-project and dedicated to making OpenStack as a whole successful.
> >
> > I currently work as the Director of Open Source at Nebula, Inc.
> Previously I was a principal engineer on the private cloud team at
> Rackspace, and before that I was a senior developer on the Nebula project
> at NASA where Nova was created.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vish
> > ___
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] TC candidacy

2013-03-24 Thread balaji patnala 
+1

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Monty Taylor  wrote:

> I confirm that Thierry is eligible to run for a seat on the TC.
>
> On 03/15/2013 11:32 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to run for reelection to one of the Technical Committee
> > directly-elected seats.
> >
> > For those who don't know me, I've been handling release management
> > duties for OpenStack since November 2010, a work currently sponsored by
> > the OpenStack Foundation. My involvement is mostly around project
> > coordination, keeping a global view and trying to anticipate issues as
> > our development community grows even larger. I'm also heading the
> > Vulnerability Management team, which handles incoming security issues
> > reports. On the development side, I authored the rootwrap framework
> > which is being used by a few of our projects, and whenever I find some
> > free time, I'm working on improving it.
> >
> > I've been regularly elected by our community to the Project Policy Board
> > and Technical Committee directly-elected seats for the last two years. I
> > was heavily involved in the transition to our new governance, authored
> > the Technical Committee charter, and have been chosen to chair it for
> > the past 6 months.
> >
> > I think it's important that the Technical Committee contains
> > representation from the horizontal functions within the project (Docs,
> > QA, Infrastructure, Vulnerability management, Release management...),
> > since each project is already represented by the seats granted for all
> PTLs.
> >
> > Over the last 30 months we grew from 2 projects to 10 projects, and I'm
> > proud to be part of this community which successfully managed to handle
> > growth and adoption while preserving our ideals of open design and open
> > development.
> >
> > The challenges ahead of us include accommodating further growth, resist
> > fragmentation, and maintaining efficiency and coherence as we grow well
> > past Dunbar's number. I hope that you place me in a position where I can
> > help us through those challenges.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
>  ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack for begginers event

2013-03-24 Thread Atul Jha 
Luis,



Hi folks,

I want to share the slides I prepared for the OpenStack for begginers event

http://www.slideshare.net/LuisGervaso/openstack-2013-1

These are based in OpenStack 2013.1 testing repository

Cheers!


Great work.
Much appreciated!!

Cheers!!

Atul Jha
http://www.csscorp.com/common/email-disclaimer.php

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp