[opensource-dev] being forced to upgrade to "2.1 Alpha" release
Some users report they were forced to download the 2.0.2, "2.1 Alpha" release. Is it correct to assume this only happens to those who had installed a previous Beta release, and that this does NOT happen to those who only used 'stable' 2.x releases? This Alpha has a lot of great improvements but also some important misbehaviour (say scripts). Maybe this won't be a surprise for most of you, but I have the feeling that this test release is being used even for common daily tasks (while it shouldn't) from a relevant number of users. Opensource Obscure -- http://www.google.com/profiles/opensourceobscure ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] being forced to upgrade to "2.1 Alpha" release
More likely only to those still using the last Beta release. On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Opensource Obscure wrote: > > Some users report they were forced to download the > 2.0.2, "2.1 Alpha" release. > > Is it correct to assume this only happens to those > who had installed a previous Beta release, > and that this does NOT happen to those who only > used 'stable' 2.x releases? > > This Alpha has a lot of great improvements but also > some important misbehaviour (say scripts). Maybe this > won't be a surprise for most of you, but I have the > feeling that this test release is being used even for > common daily tasks (while it shouldn't) from a relevant > number of users. > > Opensource Obscure > -- > http://www.google.com/profiles/opensourceobscure > ___ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] being forced to upgrade to "2.1 Alpha" release
On 2010-06-14 3:15, Opensource Obscure wrote: > Some users report they were forced to download the > 2.0.2, "2.1 Alpha" release. > > Is it correct to assume this only happens to those > who had installed a previous Beta release, > and that this does NOT happen to those who only > used 'stable' 2.x releases? > > This Alpha has a lot of great improvements but also > some important misbehaviour (say scripts). Maybe this > won't be a surprise for most of you, but I have the > feeling that this test release is being used even for > common daily tasks (while it shouldn't) from a relevant > number of users. > I used the stable 2.0.2 release quite a bit this weekend and was not prompted to upgrade, so I suspect it's just the old Beta releases that are doing that. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] viewer-external update
Hi, Update on viewer-external: the last 2 "hg pull" from viewer-public keep failing when building on all platforms and, therefore, do not get to the export stage (we export only if builds pass). I think I identified the culprit: a bunch of new files and dependencies added for crash tracking. I'll be working with Lindens to determine what to do with those files and dependencies with respect to FLOSS. Thanks for your patience. Cheers, - Merov ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
