Re: [opensource-dev] Snowglobe 2.0 update
Hi Ricky, On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Ricky wrote: > Any particular reason that http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowglobe > doesn't get it's experimental "trunk" build updated when these new > builds are released? The current version up there is 2.0.1.3339 > released April 27, 2010. > No particular reason other than it needs to be done manually. The reason it's never been automated is that it gives us an opportunity to prevent the wide dissemination of possibly bogus builds to unsuspecting casual users (those are trunk versions after all and we have seen the trunk badly broken for days at a time in the past). People like you picking up build notifications from @sldev-commit are considered savvy enough to not be outraged if a trunk build fails rapidly. > > If there's no particular reason, I (or whomever gets to it first,) can > update those links. > Please do! Wiki updating from the community is always appreciated. Thanks for doing this. Cheers, - Merov ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Snowglobe 2.0 update
I figure that since the particular links I was looking at are marked (in bold) with the word "Experimental" I figure that people realize that it might be broken... Even so, I've added a line of warning that might help filter out the unhelpful. Trunk build links updated on https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowglobe#Development_Versions Ricky Cron Stardust On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote: > Hi Ricky, > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Ricky wrote: >> >> Any particular reason that http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowglobe >> doesn't get it's experimental "trunk" build updated when these new >> builds are released? The current version up there is 2.0.1.3339 >> released April 27, 2010. > > No particular reason other than it needs to be done manually. The reason > it's never been automated is that it gives us an opportunity to prevent the > wide dissemination of possibly bogus builds to unsuspecting casual users > (those are trunk versions after all and we have seen the trunk badly broken > for days at a time in the past). People like you picking up build > notifications from @sldev-commit are considered savvy enough to not be > outraged if a trunk build fails rapidly. > >> >> If there's no particular reason, I (or whomever gets to it first,) can >> update those links. > > Please do! Wiki updating from the community is always appreciated. Thanks > for doing this. > > Cheers, > - Merov > ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Snowglobe 2.0 update
Seeing as how the good ole boys at microsoft decided to kill vs08 has anyone successfully built with 2010 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Ricky Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:58:37 To: Philippe (Merov) Bossut Cc: Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Snowglobe 2.0 update I figure that since the particular links I was looking at are marked (in bold) with the word "Experimental" I figure that people realize that it might be broken... Even so, I've added a line of warning that might help filter out the unhelpful. Trunk build links updated on https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowglobe#Development_Versions Ricky Cron Stardust On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote: > Hi Ricky, > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Ricky wrote: >> >> Any particular reason that http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowglobe >> doesn't get it's experimental "trunk" build updated when these new >> builds are released? The current version up there is 2.0.1.3339 >> released April 27, 2010. > > No particular reason other than it needs to be done manually. The reason > it's never been automated is that it gives us an opportunity to prevent the > wide dissemination of possibly bogus builds to unsuspecting casual users > (those are trunk versions after all and we have seen the trunk badly broken > for days at a time in the past). People like you picking up build > notifications from @sldev-commit are considered savvy enough to not be > outraged if a trunk build fails rapidly. > >> >> If there's no particular reason, I (or whomever gets to it first,) can >> update those links. > > Please do! Wiki updating from the community is always appreciated. Thanks > for doing this. > > Cheers, > - Merov > ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
