RE: Screen sharing -(publish)

[Mukesh Reddy]

Thanks Maxim,

I followed it, in the same way but no streaming on my channel, 
where can I find the error log for this?

Thanks and Regards,
Mukesh

Mukesh Reddy | Associate Java Engineer
Cell- +91 97033 66956 | Desk- +91 (40) 67339604

[Description: us_tech_solutions_medium-001]

Reduce your Carbon Footprint, Think before you print




From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:50 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Screen sharing -(publish)

According to 
http://community.justin.tv/mediawiki/index.php/Flash_Media_Live_Encoder
you should specify
1) host: live.justin.tv
2) app:  app
3) get your id here (stream key): http://www.justin.tv/broadcast/adv_other

haven't tried, hope this will help


On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Mukesh Reddy 
mailto:muk...@ustechsolutions.com>> wrote:
Thanks maxim what about RTMP and HTTP, which link I have to share  
http://www.justin.tv/mukeshreddy/channel or 
rtmp://www.justin.tv/mukeshreddy/channel
with my users?

Thanks and Regards,
Mukesh

Mukesh Reddy | Associate Java Engineer
Cell- +91 97033 66956 | Desk- +91 (40) 67339604

[Description: us_tech_solutions_medium-001]

Reduce your Carbon Footprint, Think before you print

From: Maxim Solodovnik 
[mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:22 PM
To: 
openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Screen sharing -(publish)

you need to specify
1) justin.tv as "host"
2) mukeshreddy as "publish app"
3) i'm not sure what should be used as "id" for you "short" channel

maybe justin.tv support can help?

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Mukesh Reddy 
mailto:muk...@ustechsolutions.com>> wrote:
Hello everyone ,
How to share the meeting through Justin.tv, my url in Justin.tv 
is http://www.justin.tv/mukeshreddy .
But how to publish using screen sharing publishing what I have to fill in the 
fields host publish app and  publish id.
rtmp://mukeshreddy:1935/justin.tv/openmeetings, 
after filling, I got this ip but it’s not working. I need little help to 
configure it


Thanks and Regards,
Mukesh

Mukesh Reddy | Associate Java Engineer
Cell- +91 97033 66956 | Desk- +91 (40) 67339604

[Description: us_tech_solutions_medium-001]

Reduce your Carbon Footprint, Think before you print





--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax



--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
<>

About SSL and RTMPS

[Mahmut TEKER]

Hello,

   Can I just use SSL for web interface or do I also have to implement 
RTMPS? Mainly, I just want to secure login process (username and 
password provided from LDAP). Can you inform me?


Best regards,


Mahmut TEKER

RE: Openmeetings hotkeys F11 Not Working In Chrome

[Joseph Karwat]

Maxim:

 

I had another user test this and their experience was the same as mine.  While 
in OpenMeetings, pressing F11 did not work, i.e., it did not put OM into full 
screen mode.  I’d be interested if any other users are experiencing the same 
issue.

 

Joseph

 

Joseph Karwat | 415-462-0263 |   JellVideo |  
 www.jellnet.com | 3psquare93x77 

Jell Networks, Inc. 

Enterprise Video Collaboration Solutions

 

Click Here to Register for your JellVideo Collaboration Account 
 

 

 

From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:08 AM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Openmeetings hotkeys

 

Works fine in my Chrome: Version 24.0.1312.52 Ubuntu 12.10

 

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Joseph Karwat  wrote:

FYI:

 

In Chrome F11 does not currently work.  One has to go to the settings menu in 
Chrome and click the Full Screen icon to be put into Full Screen mode.  
Pressing F11 again will work to exit Full Screen.

 

Joseph Karwat | 415-462-0263 |   JellVideo |  
 www.jellnet.com | 3psquare93x77 

Jell Networks, Inc. 

Enterprise Video Collaboration Solutions

 

Click Here to Register for your JellVideo Collaboration Account 
 

 

 

From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:39 AM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Maxim Solodovnik; openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org; German Grekhov; 
Ирина Архипец
Subject: Re: Openmeetings hotkeys

 

most common, I know about are:

F1 help

F11 fullscreen

F12 dev-tools (not only IE)

 

not sure about others

 

 

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Alexei Fedotov  
wrote:

Thanks, Maxim!

These two are most wanted.

BTW, F12 launches the javascript console in Internet Explorer. Is
there any list of hot keys which can be used in a browser application?


--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Maxim Solodovnik  wrote:
> All hotkeys I know are currently documented at
> http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/HotKeys.html
>
> I guess we need to look through the code and enlarge the list
> should I handle it?
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Alexei Fedotov 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Maxim,
>> What are Openmeetings shortcuts for the new functionality?
>>
>> F8 works, and distributes video windows over the screen
>> Which button enlarges video windows to the maximum size, while
>> ditributing them over the screen?
>> Which button mutes all sound except the guy who presses it?
>>
>> --
>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>> http://dataved.ru/
>> +7 916 562 8095
>>
>>
>> 2011/12/2 Alexei Fedotov 
>> >
>> >
>> > ссылка
>> > http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/
>> >
>> > функциональность доступна в комнате специального типа Microphones
>> > кнопка переключения звука f8
>> >
>> > --
>> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>> > http://dataved.ru/
>> > +7 916 562 8095
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax





 

-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax 





 

-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax 

<><>

RE: Openmeetings hotkeys F11 Not Working In Chrome

[Maxim Solodovnik]

OM Intercepts all key presses so it will not work in OM. Additionally
fullscreenmode is currently disabled in OM.
On Jan 25, 2013 12:44 AM, "Joseph Karwat"  wrote:

> Maxim:
>
> ** **
>
> I had another user test this and their experience was the same as mine.
> While in OpenMeetings, pressing F11 did not work, i.e., it did not put OM
> into full screen mode.  I’d be interested if any other users are
> experiencing the same issue.
>
> ** **
>
> Joseph
>
> ** **
>
> Joseph Karwat | 415-462-0263 | JellVideo  |
> www.jellnet.com | [image: 3psquare93x77] 
>
> *Jell Networks, Inc**. *
>
> Enterprise Video Collaboration Solutions
>
> ** **
>
> Click Here to Register for your JellVideo Collaboration 
> Account
> 
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:08 AM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Openmeetings hotkeys
>
> ** **
>
> Works fine in my Chrome: Version 24.0.1312.52 Ubuntu 12.10
>
> ** **
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Joseph Karwat 
> wrote:
>
> FYI:
>
>  
>
> In Chrome F11 does not currently work.  One has to go to the settings menu
> in Chrome and click the Full Screen icon to be put into Full Screen mode.
> Pressing F11 again will work to exit Full Screen.
>
>  
>
> Joseph Karwat | 415-462-0263 | JellVideo  |
> www.jellnet.com | [image: 3psquare93x77] 
>
> *Jell Networks, Inc**. *
>
> Enterprise Video Collaboration Solutions
>
>  
>
> Click Here to Register for your JellVideo Collaboration 
> Account
> 
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:39 AM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Cc:* Maxim Solodovnik; openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org; German
> Grekhov; Ирина Архипец
> *Subject:* Re: Openmeetings hotkeys
>
>  
>
> most common, I know about are:
>
> F1 help
>
> F11 fullscreen
>
> F12 dev-tools (not only IE)
>
>  
>
> not sure about others
>
>  
>
>  
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Alexei Fedotov 
> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Maxim!
>
> These two are most wanted.
>
> BTW, F12 launches the javascript console in Internet Explorer. Is
> there any list of hot keys which can be used in a browser application?
>
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
> > All hotkeys I know are currently documented at
> > http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/HotKeys.html
> >
> > I guess we need to look through the code and enlarge the list
> > should I handle it?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Alexei Fedotov <
> alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Maxim,
> >> What are Openmeetings shortcuts for the new functionality?
> >>
> >> F8 works, and distributes video windows over the screen
> >> Which button enlarges video windows to the maximum size, while
> >> ditributing them over the screen?
> >> Which button mutes all sound except the guy who presses it?
> >>
> >> --
> >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> >> http://dataved.ru/
> >> +7 916 562 8095
> >>
> >>
> >> 2011/12/2 Alexei Fedotov 
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ссылка
> >> > http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/
> >> >
> >> > функциональность доступна в комнате специального типа Microphones
> >> > кнопка переключения звука f8
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> >> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> >> > http://dataved.ru/
> >> > +7 916 562 8095
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
> 
>
>  
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax 
>
>
>
> 
>
> ** **
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax 
>
<><>

project status

[Jeff Clay]

I've messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don't think it's 
quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I'm dying to kick webex and 
at&t connect to the curb. I haven't been able to locate any type of road map 
online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of incubator status 
and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
Thanks for the information.



DISCLAIMER:

This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for the 
use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized 
use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information contained in it 
or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and delete the original 
message.

Re: project status

[Maxim Solodovnik]

The vote for making OM Apache top level project has been passed and was
positive. We are currently working on 2.1 release. And I hope we will going
to release more often. Afaik there is no roadmap so far. The next release
planned going to be 3.0 and it should be HTML5 (mainly).
On Jan 25, 2013 10:38 AM, "Jeff Clay" 
wrote:

>  I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t
> think it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to
> kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any
> type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out
> of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> --
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
> delete the original message.
>

Re: project status

[seba.wag...@gmail.com]

Hi Jeff,

which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?

There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx

@Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
there is a need for making that more detailed?



2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 

>  I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t
> think it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to
> kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any
> type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out
> of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> --
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
> delete the original message.
>



-- 
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wag...@gmail.com

Re: project status

[Maxim Solodovnik]

I thought roadmap should be more detailed and have dates (deadlines).
Currently it is more like general plans
On Jan 25, 2013 11:07 AM, "seba.wag...@gmail.com" 
wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
>
> which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
>
> There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
> http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
>
> @Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
> there is a need for making that more detailed?
>
>
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
>
>>  I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t
>> think it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to
>> kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any
>> type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out
>> of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
>>
>> Thanks for the information.
>>
>> --
>>
>> DISCLAIMER:
>>
>> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
>> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
>> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
>> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
>> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
>> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
>> delete the original message.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wag...@gmail.com
>

RE: project status

[Jeff Clay]

I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I 
experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff clay or 
jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been responded to or 
resolved.

From: seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: project status

Hi Jeff,
which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?

There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
@Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think there 
is a need for making that more detailed?


2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
mailto:jeff.c...@infotech-enterprises.com>>
I've messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don't think it's 
quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I'm dying to kick webex and 
at&t connect to the curb. I haven't been able to locate any type of road map 
online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of incubator status 
and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
Thanks for the information.



DISCLAIMER:

This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for the 
use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized 
use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information contained in it 
or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and delete the original 
message.



--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wag...@gmail.com

RE: project status

[Jeff Clay]

Oh, and I was using version 2.1

From: Jeff Clay
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: project status

I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I 
experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff clay or 
jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been responded to or 
resolved.

From: seba.wag...@gmail.com 
[mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
To: 
openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: project status

Hi Jeff,
which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?

There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
@Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think there 
is a need for making that more detailed?


2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
mailto:jeff.c...@infotech-enterprises.com>>
I've messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don't think it's 
quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I'm dying to kick webex and 
at&t connect to the curb. I haven't been able to locate any type of road map 
online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of incubator status 
and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
Thanks for the information.



DISCLAIMER:

This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for the 
use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized 
use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information contained in it 
or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and delete the original 
message.



--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wag...@gmail.com



To preserve the environment, please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

Re: project status

[seba.wag...@gmail.com]

Hi Jeff,

For production you should be using version 2.0.
2.1 is not released ... but to tryout SIP integration I would use 2.1 too
and discuss issues here.
SIP integration has been reworked heavily lately.
Maybe you can tell us more about your problems with the SIP integration.
What exact revision of OpenMeetings 2.1 you have been using?
Have you been able to make make calls into the conference room from
SIP/landlane and out?

Sebastian


2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 

>  Oh, and I was using version 2.1
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jeff Clay
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: project status
>
> ** **
>
> I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I
> experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff
> clay or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been
> responded to or resolved.
>
>  
>
> *From:* seba.wag...@gmail.com 
> [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: project status
>
>  
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
>
>
> There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
> http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
>
> @Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
> there is a need for making that more detailed?
>
>  
>
>  
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
>
> I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t think
> it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to kick
> webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any type
> of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of
> incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
>  
>  --
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>
> ** **
>  --
>
>
> To preserve the environment, please don't print this e-mail unless you
> really need to.
>



-- 
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wag...@gmail.com

RE: project status

[Jeff Clay]

Sebastian,

It's been a few months since I've tried it, but I never could get the web audio 
to mix with the asterisk/sip audio. I could dial in to the conferences fine and 
other conference users could hear each other if they were dialed in. After 
researching more, I found that I needed redphone or some app of similar title 
to mix the audio, but I never could get it run. The required (redphone) project 
seemed almost dead/abandoned. I filed bug/trouble reports with OM and the 
responsible devs of the app and never got a response. While not necessarily 
bugs, but enhancements/feature requests to make it more competitive with webex 
and at&t connect is to have the dial-in meetme bridge numbers random generate 
(and do a check, obviously, to make sure the random number hadn't been randomly 
generated and in user before) instead of going in a sequential order within the 
range specified in the settings. Oh, and an actual bug that comes to mind is 
that when you delete a conference room or it naturally expires, the meetme 
bridge is not removed the database; which allows users to call in and use the 
audio bridge with expired credentials. Also, even when you're not a presenter, 
but just a regular meeting attendee without any special privs, you can click on 
the presented document or whiteboard and your clicks show up (including the 
pulsating circles) to all users. With this being written in java, is there a 
way to get the video containers (the small windows containing the webcams of 
other users) to be able to drag outside of the main/hosting browser window? If 
you have multiple monitors and wish to drag the webcam windows to another 
screen, you're limited to only dragging them within the browser window. I know 
I'm throwing a lot at you, this was tested hastily, but extensively, between 
myself and some other admins. We really liked the potential this showed, 
especially against the user limitations of bigbluebutton, but as admins, we 
can't devote a lot of time to developing/changing/patching the problems or 
features we found or need.

If there is a potential to resolve some of the items addressed above, I will 
gladly setup a new test box using current code and actively work with whomever 
necessary.

Thanks for your time.

From: seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: project status

Hi Jeff,

For production you should be using version 2.0.
2.1 is not released ... but to tryout SIP integration I would use 2.1 too and 
discuss issues here.
SIP integration has been reworked heavily lately.
Maybe you can tell us more about your problems with the SIP integration.
What exact revision of OpenMeetings 2.1 you have been using?
Have you been able to make make calls into the conference room from 
SIP/landlane and out?

Sebastian

2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
mailto:jeff.c...@infotech-enterprises.com>>
Oh, and I was using version 2.1

From: Jeff Clay
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
To: 
openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: project status

I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I 
experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff clay or 
jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been responded to or 
resolved.

From: seba.wag...@gmail.com 
[mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
To: 
openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: project status

Hi Jeff,
which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?

There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
@Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think there 
is a need for making that more detailed?


2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
mailto:jeff.c...@infotech-enterprises.com>>
I've messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don't think it's 
quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I'm dying to kick webex and 
at&t connect to the curb. I haven't been able to locate any type of road map 
online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of incubator status 
and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
Thanks for the information.



DISCLAIMER:

This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for the 
use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized 
use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information contained in it 
or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in 
error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and delete the original 
message.



--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#

Re: project status

[seba.wag...@gmail.com]

@Jeff: Thanks for the feedback, I think some of the issues have been
resolved. Simply dragging the video out of the browser is not possible.
There has been some feature request in order to open a video in a new
browser window, that would be almost the same. But it is not implemented
yet.

@Maxim: I think dates are difficult for the HTML5 part. You can only give
rough estimations. But for the 2.1 version we could give some more proper
estimations that is true.
Have you finished the rework of the SIP integration? Have you done some
test call to check the audio quality/delay?

Thanks!
Sebastian


2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 

>  Sebastian,
>
> ** **
>
> It’s been a few months since I’ve tried it, but I never could get the web
> audio to mix with the asterisk/sip audio. I could dial in to the
> conferences fine and other conference users could hear each other if they
> were dialed in. After researching more, I found that I needed redphone or
> some app of similar title to mix the audio, but I never could get it run.
> The required (redphone) project seemed almost dead/abandoned. I filed
> bug/trouble reports with OM and the responsible devs of the app and never
> got a response. While not necessarily bugs, but enhancements/feature
> requests to make it more competitive with webex and at&t connect is to have
> the dial-in meetme bridge numbers random generate (and do a check,
> obviously, to make sure the random number hadn’t been randomly generated
> and in user before) instead of going in a sequential order within the range
> specified in the settings. Oh, and an actual bug that comes to mind is that
> when you delete a conference room or it naturally expires, the meetme
> bridge is not removed the database; which allows users to call in and use
> the audio bridge with expired credentials. Also, even when you’re not a
> presenter, but just a regular meeting attendee without any special privs,
> you can click on the presented document or whiteboard and your clicks show
> up (including the pulsating circles) to all users. With this being written
> in java, is there a way to get the video containers (the small windows
> containing the webcams of other users) to be able to drag outside of the
> main/hosting browser window? If you have multiple monitors and wish to drag
> the webcam windows to another screen, you’re limited to only dragging them
> within the browser window. I know I’m throwing a lot at you, this was
> tested hastily, but extensively, between myself and some other admins. We
> really liked the potential this showed, especially against the user
> limitations of bigbluebutton, but as admins, we can’t devote a lot of time
> to developing/changing/patching the problems or features we found or need.
> 
>
> ** **
>
> If there is a potential to resolve some of the items addressed above, I
> will gladly setup a new test box using current code and actively work with
> whomever necessary.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 PM
>
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: project status
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
>
> For production you should be using version 2.0.
>
> 2.1 is not released ... but to tryout SIP integration I would use 2.1 too
> and discuss issues here.
>
> SIP integration has been reworked heavily lately.
>
> Maybe you can tell us more about your problems with the SIP integration.
> What exact revision of OpenMeetings 2.1 you have been using?
>
> Have you been able to make make calls into the conference room from
> SIP/landlane and out?
>
>
> Sebastian
>
> ** **
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
>
> Oh, and I was using version 2.1
>
>  
>
> *From:* Jeff Clay
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: project status
>
>  
>
> I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I
> experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff
> clay or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been
> responded to or resolved.
>
>  
>
> *From:* seba.wag...@gmail.com 
> [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: project status
>
>  
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
>
>
> There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
> http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
>
> @Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
> there is a need for making that more detailed?
>
>  
>
>  
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
>
> I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t think
> it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to kick
> webex and at&t connect 

Re: project status

[Maxim Solodovnik]

We still working on SIP
right now we are working on SIP audio and video


On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:24 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com <
seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:

> @Jeff: Thanks for the feedback, I think some of the issues have been
> resolved. Simply dragging the video out of the browser is not possible.
> There has been some feature request in order to open a video in a new
> browser window, that would be almost the same. But it is not implemented
> yet.
>
> @Maxim: I think dates are difficult for the HTML5 part. You can only give
> rough estimations. But for the 2.1 version we could give some more proper
> estimations that is true.
> Have you finished the rework of the SIP integration? Have you done some
> test call to check the audio quality/delay?
>
> Thanks!
> Sebastian
>
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
>
>>  Sebastian,
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> It’s been a few months since I’ve tried it, but I never could get the web
>> audio to mix with the asterisk/sip audio. I could dial in to the
>> conferences fine and other conference users could hear each other if they
>> were dialed in. After researching more, I found that I needed redphone or
>> some app of similar title to mix the audio, but I never could get it run.
>> The required (redphone) project seemed almost dead/abandoned. I filed
>> bug/trouble reports with OM and the responsible devs of the app and never
>> got a response. While not necessarily bugs, but enhancements/feature
>> requests to make it more competitive with webex and at&t connect is to have
>> the dial-in meetme bridge numbers random generate (and do a check,
>> obviously, to make sure the random number hadn’t been randomly generated
>> and in user before) instead of going in a sequential order within the range
>> specified in the settings. Oh, and an actual bug that comes to mind is that
>> when you delete a conference room or it naturally expires, the meetme
>> bridge is not removed the database; which allows users to call in and use
>> the audio bridge with expired credentials. Also, even when you’re not a
>> presenter, but just a regular meeting attendee without any special privs,
>> you can click on the presented document or whiteboard and your clicks show
>> up (including the pulsating circles) to all users. With this being written
>> in java, is there a way to get the video containers (the small windows
>> containing the webcams of other users) to be able to drag outside of the
>> main/hosting browser window? If you have multiple monitors and wish to drag
>> the webcam windows to another screen, you’re limited to only dragging them
>> within the browser window. I know I’m throwing a lot at you, this was
>> tested hastily, but extensively, between myself and some other admins. We
>> really liked the potential this showed, especially against the user
>> limitations of bigbluebutton, but as admins, we can’t devote a lot of time
>> to developing/changing/patching the problems or features we found or need.
>> 
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> If there is a potential to resolve some of the items addressed above, I
>> will gladly setup a new test box using current code and actively work with
>> whomever necessary.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks for your time.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* seba.wag...@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 PM
>>
>> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: project status
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>>
>> For production you should be using version 2.0.
>>
>> 2.1 is not released ... but to tryout SIP integration I would use 2.1 too
>> and discuss issues here.
>>
>> SIP integration has been reworked heavily lately.
>>
>> Maybe you can tell us more about your problems with the SIP integration.
>> What exact revision of OpenMeetings 2.1 you have been using?
>>
>> Have you been able to make make calls into the conference room from
>> SIP/landlane and out?
>>
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay 
>>
>> Oh, and I was using version 2.1
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* Jeff Clay
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
>> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
>> *Subject:* RE: project status
>>
>>  
>>
>> I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I
>> experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff
>> clay or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been
>> responded to or resolved.
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* seba.wag...@gmail.com 
>> [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com]
>>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
>> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: project status
>>
>>  
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
>>
>>
>> There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
>> http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
>>
>> @Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Road