Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] BTX halted

[bscuk2]

Hi,

I came across this post which may help.

Robert

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/294364/btx-halted-when-i-trying-to-install-freebsd-10-3-on-my-notebook-i-got-this-mess

On 08/03/2018 15:54, Priyadarshan via openindiana-discuss wrote:

Hi,

I have successfully installed OpenIndiana Hipster 2017.10 Live via USB 
image on a ThinkPad W541.


Now, I am trying to install to 2 different workstations, using same 
USB stick:


- HP z620 with Xeon E5
- Asus X399 motherboard with AMD 1950X Threadripper

After a few seconds, both machines give same message "BTX halted"

See screehsots https://imgur.com/a/pXMKn

I tried setting BIOS to legacy mode and UEFI mode.

Right now both machines are running FReeBSD 11.1-RELEASE.

From both, I am able to boot a FreeBSD installer, both in legacy mode 
and UEFI mode.


I wonder why it boots fine from the ThinkPad, and not from the other 2 
machines.


Is there anything I need to do in order to have the image boot?

Priyadarshan

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How to create an installer/ bootable recovery iso from a running system?

[bscuk2]

Perhaps it might be worth considering saving a ZFS Snapshot in a remote 
location for a restore solution or exploring barman for a database solution


Robert


On 27/07/2018 14:15, Guenther Alka wrote:

Question:

Is it possible to create a bootable iso installer from a configured 
and at best online from a running system (that works then like the 
regular OS iso installer)?


Intention is to reinstall the fully configued Oi/OmniOS from this iso 
for disaster recovery with the help of the regular installer process.


I have done this in the past with a Linux appliance where this was 
part of the distribution and where you are able to create a bootable 
installer DVD on the fly to restore the system after a crash or to go 
back to a former state. Simple and genious. A bootable USB stick can 
be easily created from the iso with the Rufus tool.



Gea
@napp-it.org

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Hipster 10 / 2018 Mate desktop 1. 2 -changing password utility

[bscuk2]

Hello,

I am sorry to say after spending some time on it I have had no success 
on two separate hardware setups with this workaround.


Regards

Robert


On 06/11/2018 19:25, Alexander Pyhalov via openindiana-discuss wrote:

Hi.

Can you check if 
pkg://userland/desktop/mate/control-center@1.20.3,5.11-2018.0.0.1:20181106T191520Z
from http://buildzone.oi-build.r61.net:1000/ works for you?


С уважением,
Александр Пыхалов,
программист отдела телекоммуникационной инфраструктуры
управления информационно-коммуникационной инфраструктуры ЮФУ



От: openbabel 
Отправлено: 2 ноября 2018 г. 19:01:30
Кому: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Тема: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Hipster 10 / 2018 Mate desktop 1. 2 -changing   
password utility

Dear all,

I have tried to change the current password using the mate desktop
utility. The utility seems to stall under authentication on two separate
hardware configurations. Is there a work around for this problem ?

Regards


Robert Jones



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Nvidia GTX 1060

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I have a GTX 1060 GRAPHICS CARD the oi system.The system works from the 
console.Desktop boot terminates at LightDM unavailable. I am assuming 
its a driver issue. In considering graphics drivers on oi I would like 
to be able to use this card as it represents a top selling graphics card 
for NVIDIA.


Hope this is useful feedback.

Robert Jones



On 05/11/2019 21:04, Jim Klimov wrote:

On November 5, 2019 7:04:49 PM UTC, ken mays via openindiana-discuss 
 wrote:

Hi,
One of the goals discussed a few years ago was to support many of the
legacy Nvidia cards within a 10-15 year coverage.

I'm proposing the latest driver, Nvidia 440.31, as it works with recent
Nvidia 600-series through RTX graphic cards (also Quadro 400 through
Quadro RTX 8000).
This video driver release provides nine years of recent graphics
hardware-acceleration coverage for OI.
~ Ken Mays


.
  
___

openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

No problem with me or my nvidia-select PR, except no idea if i can test it ;)

Jim
--
Typos courtesy of K-9 Mail on my Android

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New laptop compatibility? System76?

[bscuk2]

Integrators such as star labs would consider undertaking testing on oios 
if you were a potential customer. Integrators Tux computers Germany have 
not responded. Clevo may announce their new models for 2020 soon. 
https://www.clevo.com.tw/index-en.asp#


Robert



https://starlabs.systems/pages/star-labtop-compare

On 23/11/2019 20:07, Dr Peter jones wrote:

Dear Leonard,
https://www.pcspecialist.co.uk/notebooks/lafiteIV-15/
System 76 customises the clevo chassis for particular distributions. You
may consider asking system 76 to build you a custom machines or purchase a
standard clevo laptop from PC specialists and swop out components yourself.
It is unknown if clevo is planning an AMD version this year.

Robert

On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 at 17:27, Leonard Sitongia  wrote:


Hi,

I’m wondering if new laptops that are available now and run Linux are
likely to be compatible with OI? In particular, I’m looking at the latest
System76 Galago Pro. I don’t know the specs for the graphics and wifi. I
see a couple of older System76 laptops on the hardware list. I wonder about
their latest offerings.

Thanks!
==Leonard Sitongia




___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] mp4

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I note that the gradual roll out of the new video codex AV1 is currently 
been tested by Firefox. Presumably this may well solve some of the 
playback problems in coming versions of Firefox.


Regards

Robert

http://aomedia.org/agora-io-joins-the-alliance-for-open-media/






On 17/12/2019 17:32, Alexander Pyhalov via openindiana-discuss wrote:

Look at http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster-encumbered/ repository.
It contains VLC and some gstreamer plugins, necessary to play mp4.

С уважением,
Александр Пыхалов,
программист отдела телекоммуникационной инфраструктуры
управления информационно-коммуникационной инфраструктуры ЮФУ



От: Marc Lobelle 
Отправлено: 17 декабря 2019 г. 20:01
Кому: OpenIndiana
Тема: [OpenIndiana-discuss] mp4

Dear all,

Is there a way to view a MP4 file. Obviously it does not work currently
with firefox. However, it is possible to download these files, but is
there a program available to view these on OIhipster ?

Thanks


Marc

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] mate release 1.24

[bscuk2]

Mate desktop version 1.24 has been released with a number of updates 
2020-02-10 09:00. 


Is this likely to be something to be included in the next snapshot ?

Regards,

Robert Jones

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Thank you Aurelien

[bscuk2]

Thanks for your help !!!

Robert Jones


On 20/03/2020 01:23, Carl Brewer wrote:



Hey,
I know there's a long history of hundreds of people contributing to 
SunOS/Solaris/OS/OI/Hipster, I just want to thank Aurélien, who is 
doing a tower of work for the OI Hipster upcoming snapshot - it is 
VERY much appreciated!


Thank you

Carl

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Nvidia graphics driver on Hipster 2020.04

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I have undertaken a clean Samsung SSD EVO install of the lastest 
snapshop 2020.04 on a Z170 3HP intel G3500 motherboard with a GTX1060 3b 
and Samsung 43 ultra wide monitor. The system is running on verbose and 
does not recognise the card. Could you advise on a suitable replacement 
driver, and install script location ?


Thank you


Robert Jones

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Nvidia graphics driver on Hipster 2020.04

[bscuk2]

I have managed to install NVIDIA-Solaris-x86-396.24 it is not for the 
faint hearted but the result on the EVGA GTX1060 is promising. The 
output seems fast, giving a 120 Hz refresh on a wide Samsung 43 inch 
screen. problems so far is an intermittent boot error on xserver.


Robert


On 10/05/2020 19:20, Stephan Althaus wrote:

Hello!

You can find drivers here:

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/drivers/unix/solaris-display-archive/

i am using version 440.64 right now.


You should uninstall

pkg:/driver/graphics/nvidia
pkg:/x11/server/xorg/driver/xorg-video-nv

and then do the instal, this example for the version that i use

# pfexec /bin/sh NVIDIA-Solaris-x86-440.64.run --extract-only
# cd NVIDIA-Solaris-x86-440.64
# pfexec pkgadd -d . NVDAgraphics NVDAgraphicsr


If you wish to create a new boot environment to be save, do it like 
descibed here


https://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Nvidia+Graphics


Greetings,
Stephan


On 05/10/20 13:51, bscuk2 wrote:

Dear All,

I have undertaken a clean Samsung SSD EVO install of the lastest 
snapshop 2020.04 on a Z170 3HP intel G3500 motherboard with a GTX1060 
3b and Samsung 43 ultra wide monitor. The system is running on 
verbose and does not recognise the card. Could you advise on a 
suitable replacement driver, and install script location ?


Thank you


Robert Jones

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss




___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Support Icon on Desktop

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

Perhaps OI should have a default launcher on the desktop pointed at Oi 
handbook and other support documentation online to assist the user ?


Regards,


Robert Jones

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Support Icon on Desktop

[bscuk2]

Hi,

Good ideas should always be reviewed.My only reservation would be a 
security issue,but I don't see it ?


Robert


On 27/06/2020 13:08, Aurélien Larcher wrote:

Hi,
I actually suggested this similar idea three years ago:

https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/pull/2497

This would have distributed the OI documentation in a package and provided
a menu icon to open it in a browser.
The proposal was rejected.

Kind regards,

Aurélien



On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 1:54 PM bscuk2  wrote:


Dear All,

Perhaps OI should have a default launcher on the desktop pointed at Oi
handbook and other support documentation online to assist the user ?

Regards,


Robert Jones

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss






___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] SPARC project Dilios

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

The sparc protect seems to have been quiet for a while does anyone know 
what the latest news is ?



Regards


Robert Jones

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Support Icon on Desktop

[bscuk2]

I did see an icon in the wiki graphics which might be of interest for 
those setting up a desktop shortcut.


Robert


On 27/06/2020 17:37, Alexander Pyhalov via openindiana-discuss wrote:

Hi.
If we speak about adding link to default bookmarks, just modify 
https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/components/web/firefox/files/openindiana-default-bookmarks.html
 .
As for distributing oi-docs with ISO images, I'm not sure - I think it's 
usually not a problem to follow provided link.

С уважением,
Александр Пыхалов,
программист отдела телекоммуникационной инфраструктуры
управления информационно-коммуникационной инфраструктуры ЮФУ


____
От: bscuk2 
Отправлено: 27 июня 2020 г. 15:15
Кому: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Тема: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Support Icon on Desktop

Hi,

Good ideas should always be reviewed.My only reservation would be a
security issue,but I don't see it ?

Robert


On 27/06/2020 13:08, Aurélien Larcher wrote:

Hi,
I actually suggested this similar idea three years ago:

https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/pull/2497

This would have distributed the OI documentation in a package and provided
a menu icon to open it in a browser.
The proposal was rejected.

Kind regards,

Aurélien



On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 1:54 PM bscuk2  wrote:


Dear All,

Perhaps OI should have a default launcher on the desktop pointed at Oi
handbook and other support documentation online to assist the user ?

Regards,


Robert Jones

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Message area top panel Mate1.22.2 04.2020

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I am using mate 122.2 and notice the icons on the top right of the 
screen in the notification area are bunching.  After spending time I 
could not separate the icons due to icon control not allowing me to 
reset the separation. I am using a ultra wide and wonder if that is 
contributing to this problem. Perhaps the 1.24 release may fix this issue.


Regards,


Robert


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox

[bscuk2]

Hello,

The best outcome would be a version with advanced integration of AV1 
codex on Firefox. https://research.mozilla.org/av1-media-codecs/


Robert Jones


On 05/07/2020 11:10, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:

Hello,
Are there any plans to have a more recentversion of Firefox? Some Google 
sitescomplain that this version is quite old!I upgraded my system last May.
Kind regards,Apostolos
Στάλθηκε από το Ταχυδρομείο Yahoo σε Android
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] tiger

[bscuk2]

https://www.tiger-supplies.co.uk/Catalogue/personal-protective-equipment/COVID-19-PPE/COVID-19-Masks-and-Respirators/Cofra-Reuseable-Mask-105-04-22


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Libreoffice fails to launch after updates

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

After updating the system 2020.04 I find Libreoffice is unable to 
launch. The application starts but after a few seconds shuts down. I 
have uninstalled, and reinstalled but the same problem persists. The 
only work around is by pointing files to the application. Is this a bug 
or specific to my system?


Regards,


Robert Jones


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Nvidia card installed.. now lightdm fails

[bscuk2]

Hello,

This is a problem I encountered installing a driver update for a EVEA 
GTX1060.I tried a number of drivers before getting success with 
396.24.You may check the version of xorg video compatibility with the 
driver. A number of bugs and work rounds are listed in the Nvidia 
support forum.


regards,


Robert



On 25/08/2020 07:36, Tony Brian Albers wrote:

Good morning,

So I managed to find an old nvidia card, and I got the nvidia driver
installed. I followed the notes here:
https://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Nvidia+Graphics

But to uninstall driver/graphics/nvidia, I also had to remove xorg-
video (meta package).

During the 'bootadm update-archive -R /mnt' step, it reported that the
driver was 32-bit and would be excluded.

After that, and a reboot, lightdm won't start.

Xorg works, running startx when logged in gives me a nice twm desktop.
Also, Xorg.0.log states that the nvidia driver 304.137 is actually in
use.

But lightdm -not so much.
 From /var/log/lightdm/seat0-greeter.log :

** Message: 07:24:18.123: [Configuration] Reading file:
/etc/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf
ld.so.1: lightdm-gtk-greeter: fatal: libEGL.so.1: open failed: No such
file or directory
ld.so.1: lightdm-gtk-greeter: fatal: relocation error: file
/usr/lib/64/libcairo.so.2: symbol eglGetProcAddress: referenced symbol
not found
ld.so.1: lightdm-gtk-greeter: fatal: relocation error: file
/usr/lib/64/libgtk-3.so.0: symbol cairo_pattern_destroy: referenced
symbol not found
ld.so.1: lightdm-gtk-greeter: fatal: relocation error: file
/usr/sbin/lightdm-gtk-greeter: symbol gtk_init: referenced symbol not
found

Which is odd, since it used to work.
Using ldd on /usr/sbin/lightdm-gtk-greeter, it reports:

libEGL.so.1 =>   (file not found)

And chasing down the symbolic links, I get:

root@emu:/usr/lib/amd64# ls -l /usr/lib/64/libEGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root  23 aug. 23 12:52
/usr/lib/64/libEGL.so.1 -> ../GL/amd64/libEGL.so.1

root@emu:/usr/lib/amd64# ls -l /usr/lib/GL/amd64/libEGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root  48 aug. 23 12:52
/usr/lib/GL/amd64/libEGL.so.1 ->
../../../../var/run/opengl/lib/amd64/libEGL.so.1

root@emu:/usr/X11/lib# ls -l /var/run/opengl/lib/amd64/libEGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root  37 aug. 25 07:24
/var/run/opengl/lib/amd64/libEGL.so.1 ->
/usr/X11/lib/NVIDIA/amd64/libEGL.so.1

root@emu:/usr/lib/amd64# ls -l /usr/X11/lib/NVIDIA/amd64/libEGL.so.1
/usr/X11/lib/NVIDIA/amd64/libEGL.so.1: No such file or directory

Hmm..

So, what package is supposed to provide this?:

root@emu:/var/log/lightdm# pkg search -l libEGL.so.1
INDEX  ACTION VALUE  PACKAGE
basename   link   usr/lib/amd64/libEGL.so.1  pkg:
/service/opengl/ogl-select@0.5.11-2020.0.1.5
basename   link   usr/lib/GL/amd64/libEGL.so.1   pkg:
/service/opengl/ogl-select@0.5.11-2020.0.1.5
basename   link   usr/lib/GL/libEGL.so.1 pkg:
/service/opengl/ogl-select@0.5.11-2020.0.1.5
basename   link   usr/lib/libEGL.so.1pkg:
/service/opengl/ogl-select@0.5.11-2020.0.1.5
basename   link   usr/lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL.so.1 pkg:
/x11/library/mesa@13.0.6-2020.0.1.7
basename   link   usr/lib/mesa/libEGL.so.1   pkg:
/x11/library/mesa@13.0.6-2020.0.1.7

Looking closer at these, it seems that only the files from "mesa" are
actual files. The others are just symlinks.
These are the 'real' ones:

root@emu:/usr# ls -l lib/mesa/libEGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root  15 aug. 23 12:52
lib/mesa/libEGL.so.1 -> libEGL.so.1.0.0

root@emu:/usr# ls -l lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL*
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root  15 aug. 23 12:52
lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL.so -> libEGL.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root  15 aug. 23 12:52
lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL.so.1 -> libEGL.so.1.0.0
-r-xr-xr-x   1 root bin   224736 aug. 23 18:32
lib/mesa/amd64/libEGL.so.1.0.0

root@emu:/usr/lib/mesa/amd64# file libEGL.so.1.0.0
libEGL.so.1.0.0:ELF 64-bit LSB dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1,
dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging information available


So it seems that the files are there, but the symlinks are incorrect.

It looks like the libs from the mesa package are never found.


What could be the cause of this and how do I fix it?
  
TIA,


/tony




___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] LightDM Installation of webkit greeter from the repro.

[bscuk2]

Hello,

I have down loaded Webkit greeter for LightDM from the repro. I have 
checked the installation in the etc conf file that webkit is the default 
both in the main code and seat.


Running tests on the installation I get the following messages.

lightdm --test-mode

** (lightdm:4856): WARNING **: 12:05:07.306: Failed to get list of 
logind seats: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The 
name org.freedesktop.login1 was not provided by any .service files


** (lightdm:4856): WARNING **: 12:05:07.319: Error getting user list 
from org.freedesktop.Accounts: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name 
org.freedesktop.Accounts was not provided by any .service files
Failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager, do you have 
appropriate permissions?


I have removed the webkit and reinstalled it but it does not work. Any 
ideas where I go from here?


regards,


Robert




___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Installation of webkit on lightDM

[bscuk2]

Hello,

I have down loaded Webkit greeter for LightDM from the repro. I have 
checked the installation in the etc conf file that webkit is the default 
both in the main code and seat.


Running tests on the installation I get the following messages.

lightdm --test-mode

** (lightdm:4856): WARNING **: 12:05:07.306: Failed to get list of 
logind seats: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The 
name org.freedesktop.login1 was not provided by any .service files


** (lightdm:4856): WARNING **: 12:05:07.319: Error getting user list 
from org.freedesktop.Accounts: 
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name 
org.freedesktop.Accounts was not provided by any .service files
Failed to use bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager, do you have 
appropriate permissions?


I have removed the webkit and reinstalled it but it does not work. Any 
ideas where I go from here?


regards,


Robert

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Gimp 2.10.20 possible bug

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I was using Gimp version 2.10.20 and I noticed a problem. When scaling a 
graphic the program became confused. To increase the size and scale of 
the graphic,making it bigger actually made it smaller and vice versa. 
Testing the same version on windows everything works as intended.


Regards,

Robert

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Nvidia K2200 and 4K monitor?

[bscuk2]

Hi,

I am running a Samsung 43 ultrawide on a EVGA GTX1060 on driver 396.24. 
Works fine on the display port 120 refresh rate.


Robert


On 24/09/2020 11:32, Tony Brian Albers wrote:

Hi guys,

So, I've got the mentioned graphics card in my workstation.

Does anyone know how to get it to work with a 4K monitor?

I've tried using the nvidia-driver that is present in OI202004, 340.108
and also the newest, 450.66.

Using nvidia-settings, it's not possible to choose a higher resolution
than 1920x1080.

Looking at Xorg.0.log, the following seems odd:

---snip--

[45.181] (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU Quadro K2200 (GM107GL-A) at
PCI:1:0:0 (GPU-0)
[45.181] (--) NVIDIA(0): Memory: 4194304 kBytes
[45.181] (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 82.07.79.00.15
[45.181] (II) NVIDIA(0): Detected PCI Express Link width: 16X
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): Valid display device(s) on Quadro K2200 at
PCI:1:0:0
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): CRT-0
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): DFP-0
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): DFP-1
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): Philips FTV (DFP-2) (boot, connected)
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): DFP-3
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): DFP-4
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): CRT-0: 400.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): DFP-0: Internal TMDS
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-0: 330.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): DFP-1: Internal TMDS

  >
  >[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-1: 165.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
  >

[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): Philips FTV (DFP-2): Internal TMDS
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): Philips FTV (DFP-2): 165.0 MHz maximum
pixel clock
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): DFP-3: Internal DisplayPort
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-3: 960.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(0): DFP-4: Internal DisplayPort
[45.184] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-4: 960.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
[45.184] (**) NVIDIA(0): Using HorizSync/VertRefresh ranges from the
EDID for display
[45.184] (**) NVIDIA(0): device Philips FTV (DFP-2) (Using EDID
frequencies has
[45.184] (**) NVIDIA(0): been enabled on all display devices.)
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): The EDID for Philips FTV (DFP-2)
contradicts itself: mode
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): "1920x1080" is specified in the
EDID; however, the EDID's
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): valid VertRefresh range
(48.000-62.000 Hz) would exclude
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): this mode's VertRefresh (24.0 Hz);
ignoring VertRefresh
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): check for mode "1920x1080".
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): The EDID for Philips FTV (DFP-2)
contradicts itself: mode
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): "1920x1080" is specified in the
EDID; however, the EDID's
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): valid VertRefresh range
(48.000-62.000 Hz) would exclude
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): this mode's VertRefresh (30.0 Hz);
ignoring VertRefresh
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): check for mode "1920x1080".
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): The EDID for Philips FTV (DFP-2)
contradicts itself: mode
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): "1920x1080" is specified in the
EDID; however, the EDID's
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): valid VertRefresh range
(48.000-62.000 Hz) would exclude
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): this mode's VertRefresh (25.0 Hz);
ignoring VertRefresh
[45.185] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): check for mode "1920x1080".
[45.186] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): The EDID for Philips FTV (DFP-2)
contradicts itself: mode
[45.186] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): "1600x1200" is specified in the
EDID; however, the EDID's
[45.186] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): valid HorizSync range
(15.000-70.000 kHz) would exclude
[45.186] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): this mode's HorizSync (75.0 kHz);
ignoring HorizSync check
[45.186] (WW) NVIDIA(GPU-0): for mode "1600x1200".
[45.186] (==) NVIDIA(0):
[45.187] (==) NVIDIA(0): No modes were requested; the default mode
"nvidia-auto-select"
[45.187] (==) NVIDIA(0): will be used as the requested mode.
[45.187] (==) NVIDIA(0):
[45.187] (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated MetaModes:
[45.187] (II) NVIDIA(0): "DFP-2:nvidia-auto-select"
---snip--

See the 165MHz line? That's not correct, because if I do edid-decode on
the edid from the monitor, I get:

---snip--
Monitor name: Philips FTV

  >
  >Monitor ranges (GTF): 48-62Hz V, 15-70kHz H, max dotclock 600MHz
  >

Has 1 extension blocks
Checksum: 0x8b (valid)

CTA extension block
Extension version: 3
114 bytes of CTA data
Video data block
  VIC  97 3840x2160@60Hz 16:9  HorFreq: 135000 Hz Clock: 594.000 MHz
  VIC  96 3840x2160@50Hz 16:9  HorFreq: 112500 Hz Clock: 594.000 MHz
  VIC  95 3840x2160@30Hz 16:9  HorFreq: 67500 Hz Clock: 297.000 MHz
  VIC  94 3840x2160@25Hz 16:9  HorFreq: 56250 Hz Clock: 297.000 MHz
  

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Heads up: Python Solaris support at risk

[bscuk2]

Replies posted on Python forum.

Regards,


Robert


On 29/10/2020 22:36, Jesus Cea wrote:

Is you care about Python future on Solaris family, please say so in
.



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] WAZUH

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I wondered if anyone had compiled WAZUH on oi? I am not a developer.

https://documentation.wazuh.com/2.1/installation-guide/installing-wazuh-agent/wazuh_agent_solaris.html

Running through the installation I come across these errors. I have 
placed it in the user/share directory. Can anyone shed light on where I 
might go from here ?


checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.11
checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.11
checking for python3.8... no
checking for python3... python3
checking for --enable-universalsdk... no
checking for --with-universal-archs... no
checking MACHDEP... "sunos5"
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... no
configure: error: in `/user/share/wazuh-master/src/external/cpython':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details
gmake: *** [Makefile:1679: build_python] Error 77

Regards,

Robert
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Webkit2 on oios

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I have been trying to install webkit2 and slick greeter on the current 
version of oi. I am having difficulty. The lack of information available 
for Oi makes it difficult to know if lightdm needs updating or there are 
some extra dependencies required outside of the repository ? Has anyone 
had success installing this package?


It would certainly be an asset if it could find its way into the repository.

Regards,


Robert Jones


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] "format -e" segmentation fault attempting to label a 5 TB disk in Hipster 2017.10

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I am not an engineer but this seems to be a relevant bug report filed at 
illumos ?


https://www.illumos.org/issues/11952

Regards,

Robert


On 21/02/2021 20:53, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss wrote:



On 21. Feb 2021, at 22:50, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss 
 wrote:

WTF?

I  had loads of fun with this 4-5 years ago, but was able to put an EFI label 
on a 3 TB disk  and everything was fine when I moved the disk to my Solaris 10 
instance where I have two in a mirror.

I'm trying to label a 5 TB disk so I can make a backup before attempting to fix 
grub on my Solaris 10 u8 system.

So I get this:

rhb@Hipster:/etc# zpool status
  pool: epool
state: ONLINE
  scan: scrub repaired 0 in 2h30m with 0 errors on Wed Feb 17 17:39:53 2021
config:

NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
epool   ONLINE   0 0 0
  raidz1-0  ONLINE   0 0 0
c4d0s1  ONLINE   0 0 0
c6d1s1  ONLINE   0 0 0
c7d0s1  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

  pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
  scan: scrub repaired 0 in 1h39m with 0 errors on Wed Feb 17 16:49:12 2021
config:

NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rpool   ONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror-0  ONLINE   0 0 0
c4d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0
c6d1s0  ONLINE   0 0 0
c7d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors
rhb@Hipster:/etc# format -e
Searching for disks...done


AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
   0. c4d0 
  /pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,2/ide@1/cmdk@0,0
   1. c4d1 
  /pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,2/ide@1/cmdk@1,0
   2. c6d1 
  /pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,2/ide@0/cmdk@1,0
   3. c7d0 
  /pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,5/ide@1/cmdk@0,0
Specify disk (enter its number): 1

Error: can't open disk '/dev/rdsk/c4d1p0'.
Segmentation Fault

I was using OI because I knew that Solaris 10 u8 would dump core, but I 
*thought* this had been fixed in OI/Illumos.  All I want to do is put a UEFI 
label on it so I can use it with u8.

It boggles my mind that I would get a seg fault after all these years.  That 
was always my favorite bug fix because it was so easy. At least it is if you 
can recompile the code.  The overhead cost of being able to build OI is simply 
more than I am willing to pay.  I did get it to compile once *many* years ago, 
but I never got a response when I asked on the developer list how to test the 
new kernel.

But then again, I now find myself in a world where  it is proclaimed "racist" 
to insist that 2+2 = 4.

So time to take OI down and move the disk to Debian to label it.

Sigh..
Reg


Hipster 2017 is 4 years old, please use current version. If it still is dumping 
core, please file issue/let us know.

rgds,
toomas




___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] : VisualVM 2.0.6 Released

[bscuk2]

*Dear All,*

*This is the latest release of this project could it be included in the 
repo please ?*


*Regards,*

*Robert Jones
*

*
*

*January 19, 2021: VisualVM 2.0.6 Released*

This release introduces the possibility to import existing VisualVM 
settings on the first startup. See the Release Notes 
 for more details. The tool 
can be downloaded from the Download 
 page, sources are available 
in |release206|  
branch.


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Microphone and pulseaudio

[bscuk2]

Hello Tony,

I am sure I read the latest release pulse audio  contains upgrades from 
Atmos designs which may boost volume in some graphics and sound cards ?


Regards,

Robert

https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Notes/13.0/


On 12/01/2021 16:15, Tony Brian Albers wrote:

On 01/12/21 05:04 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:


On 12.01.21 16:58, Tony Brian Albers wrote:

On 01/12/21 04:39 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:


On 12.01.21 16:31, Tony Brian Albers wrote:

On 01/12/21 04:17 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:


On 12.01.21 16:10, Tony Brian Albers wrote:

...
Is there a way that I can use something like mic boost? I've been
rummaging around in pulseaudio(pacmd etc.) all day now, but I can't
find
anything that's not set to a 100% volume with regards to the
microphone.

Any ideas and suggestions are welcome.

Maybe it's not switched on in the mixer ?

I tried
$ audioctl set-control -v mic 100

But that only increased the level, and the noise with it.

I suppose that's what you mean by "mixer"?

No, I meant the equivalent of the Gnome audiomixer, Linux alsamixer,
don't know what's that on Mate now. Should be somewhere in the desktop
menu.



Yeah, that's the mate-volume-control thingy I mentioned earlier. It's at
100% for the mic volume.


Some BIOSes also have an option to switch audio devices, usually it says
'Use AudioHD' or similar. It should be switched to the AudioHD device,
if it has such.


I'll check that and report back.

/tony





___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] April May snapshot

[bscuk2]

 Forwarded Message 
Subject:April May snapshot
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:58:45 +
From:   
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org



Hello All,

Wallpapers to be included in next snapshot. I have done a basic
wallpaper for the next snapshot. I was interested if it would be
included in the next snapshot. Usually it would be a png image but I am
unable to understand what size it should be.

Let me know what you think.

Robert

https://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Image+Gallery?preview=/1474670/70156307/VISION21.PNG

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] mate desktop 1.25 release

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I was wondering if we should expect a new version of the mate desktop 
1.25 sometime soon. This is about the right time of year all be it it 
probably experienced a time delay due to CV19. I noted some snippets 
labelled 1.25 for developers?


Has anyone a idea about the version schedule this year ?

Regards,


Robert

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Insufficient Disk space for updates reported

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

After recent updates this is the information on the system. Insufficient 
disk space available (648.02 MB) for estimated need (2.48 GB) for 
Download cache


The disk is a Samsung Pro 250 SSD M.2 with an estimated 71 GB used in total.
I have deleted legacy snapshots,files etc but not further space is detected.
After running PKg rehydrate,fix etc the situation has not improved.
I am wondering if the disk space is not been reported correctly,memory swaps,
or connected with Bob Friesenhahn current threat on system monitor issues ?
I am not a developer but would appriciate any advice on how to proceed.

Regards,


Robert


# echo ::memstat | mdb -k
Page SummaryPagesMB  %Tot
     
Kernel 573167  2238   14%
Boot pages147 00%
ZFS File Data  284407  11107%
Anon   617118  2410   15%
Exec and libs1813 70%
Page cache  97732   3812%
Free (cachelist)98271   3832%
Free (freelist)   2508266  9797   60%

Total 4180921 16331
Physical  4180920 16331

# vmstat 5 5
 kthr  memorypagedisk faults  cpu
 r b w   swap  free  re  mf pi po fr de sr ro s0 s1 s2   in   sy cs us
sy id
 0 0 0 4651392 8648332 646 3029 54 48 90 0 10507 517 -0 -1 518 4786
30789 6948 28 26 46
 0 0 0 3555004 10394368 252 1583 0 0 0 0 0 48  0  0 48 2530 23181 1027
29 19 52
 0 0 0 3558672 10399384 378 915 0 0 0 0  0 49  0  0 50 2535 16221 1171
21 12 67
 0 0 0 3556604 10396764 392 1090 0 0 0 0 0 37  0  0 38 2488 18850 807
19 16 65
 0 0 0 3552712 10392784 231 1392 0 0 0 0 0 28  0  0 28 2535 20377 1270
30 16 54
  PID USERNAME  SIZE   RSS STATE  PRI NICE  TIME  CPU PROCESS/NLWP
 18249 oi 49M   13M cpu1 0   19   0:00:00 1.2%
tracker-extract/16
  1031 oi110M   42M sleep   590   0:01:51 0.9% Xorg/3
 16493 root 4568K 3460K cpu0590   0:00:14 0.9% prstat/1
 13595 oi 84M   38M sleep   360   0:00:03 0.4% mate-terminal/5
 10463 oi942M  520M sleep   490   0:01:37 0.4% firefox/44
  1906 oi149M   38M sleep   590   0:00:22 0.2% marco/6
  2004 oi   8380K 5244K sleep   590   0:00:15 0.2% gvfsd-metadata/4
 15642 oi508M  286M sleep   590   0:00:06 0.1% firefox/22
  1882 oi   3888K 2332K sleep   540   0:00:12 0.1% dbus-daemon/1
  1985 oi 75M   31M sleep   580   0:00:13 0.1%
mate-typing-mon/5
  1927 oi 12M 5732K sleep   590   0:00:04 0.1% xscreensaver/4
 5 root0K0K sleep   98  -20   0:03:12 0.1% zpool-rpool/232
 10567 oi   6598M  186M sleep   590   0:00:18 0.0% firefox/29
  1923 oi 75M   32M sleep   590   0:00:07 0.0% wnck-applet/5
 10733 oi550M  319M sleep   590   0:00:09 0.0% firefox/21
 10579 oi414M  187M sleep   490   0:00:03 0.0% firefox/19
  1948 oi   8172K 5328K sleep   590   0:00:06 0.0%
gvfs-hal-volume/4
 12291 oi866M  324M sleep   590   0:00:12 0.0% firefox/20
  1946 oi129M   68M sleep   12   19   0:02:27 0.0%
tracker-miner-f/6
  1926 oi   1045M  702M sleep   490   0:00:49 0.0% thunderbird/46
   617 redis7924K 2292K sleep   590   0:00:01 0.0% redis-server/4
  1989 oi 71M   29M sleep   590   0:00:01 0.0%
notification-ar/5
 10565 oi   6526M  156M sleep   590   0:00:08 0.0% firefox/19
  1904 oi   8656K 4340K sleep   580   0:00:01 0.0% gvfsd/4
  1634 root 4472K 1820K sleep   590   0:00:01 0.0% bash/1
 10568 oi404M  184M sleep   590   0:00:02 0.0% firefox/20
  1943 oi 53M   26M sleep   590   0:00:01 0.0% applet.py/2
  1938 oi 60M   17M sleep   590   0:00:17 0.0% tracker-store/9
  1902 oi140M   31M sleep   590   0:00:01 0.0%
mate-settings-d/6
  1863 oi 69M   25M sleep   590   0:00:01 0.0% mate-session/5
   183 root 3988K 2220K sleep   590   0:00:01 0.0% dbus-daemon/1
  3253 root 9088K 4968K sleep   590   0:00:01 0.0% nscd/32
  1901 oi 13M 4476K sleep   590   0:00:00 0.0%
gnome-keyring-d/5
ZONEIDNPROC  SWAP   RSS MEMORY  TIME  CPU ZONE
 0  122   15G 3653M22%   0:14:44 4.8% global


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Insufficient Disk space for updates reported

[bscuk2]

On 10/07/2021 12:02, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss wrote:



On 10. Jul 2021, at 13:20, bscuk2  wrote:

Dear All,

After recent updates this is the information on the system. Insufficient disk 
space available (648.02 MB) for estimated need (2.48 GB) for Download cache

The disk is a Samsung Pro 250 SSD M.2 with an estimated 71 GB used in total.
I have deleted legacy snapshots,files etc but not further space is detected.
After running PKg rehydrate,fix etc the situation has not improved.
I am wondering if the disk space is not been reported correctly,memory swaps,
or connected with Bob Friesenhahn current threat on system monitor issues ?
I am not a developer but would appriciate any advice on how to proceed.

Regards,


Robert


What does zpool list and zfs list report?

rgs,
toomas







___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Insufficient Disk space for updates reported

[bscuk2]

openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-1- -  
184Kstatic 2021-05-19 13:34
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2- -  
178.95M static 2021-07-01 17:58
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-3- -  
211Kstatic 2021-07-01 18:33
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-4- -  
1K  static 2021-07-02 09:33
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-5- -  
1K  static 2021-07-02 10:02
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-6- -  
1K  static 2021-07-02 10:18
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1   - -  
304.18M static 2021-07-02 15:54
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-7- -  
1K  static 2021-07-02 17:30
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-8- -  
11.31M  static 2021-07-02 18:19
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1-backup-1  - -  
384.84M static 2021-07-02 19:26
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1-backup-1-backup-1 - -  
19.88M  static 2021-07-03 08:36
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1-backup-1-backup-2 - -  
205Kstatic 2021-07-03 08:50
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1-backup-1-backup-3 - -  
11.47M  static 2021-07-03 08:52
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1-backup-1-backup-4 - -  
164Kstatic 2021-07-03 09:56
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1-backup-1-backup-5 - -  
148.82M static 2021-07-03 12:29
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1-backup-1-backup-6 - -  
465.75M static 2021-07-04 11:03
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1-backup-1-backup-7 - -  
441.61M static 2021-07-06 10:21
openindiana-2021:05:18-backup-2-backup-1-backup-1-backup-8 N /  
191.36M static 2021-07-07 17:18


tools used

pkg fix

pkg verify

pkg rehydrate

pkg dehydrate

Is this project able to be compiled on Oi ? 
https://github.com/bahamas10/zfs-prune-snapshots


additional error

error pkg://openindiana.org/library/security/openssl

pkg://openindiana.org/system/kernel/dtrace/providers/xdt ERROR
driver: xdt
ERROR: etc/name_to_major: 'xdt' entry not present


On 13/07/2021 08:53, bscuk2 wrote:



On 10/07/2021 12:02, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss wrote:



On 10. Jul 2021, at 13:20, bscuk2  wrote:

Dear All,

After recent updates this is the information on the system. 
Insufficient disk space available (648.02 MB) for estimated need 
(2.48 GB) for Download cache


The disk is a Samsung Pro 250 SSD M.2 with an estimated 71 GB used 
in total.
I have deleted legacy snapshots,files etc but not further space is 
detected.

After running PKg rehydrate,fix etc the situation has not improved.
I am wondering if the disk space is not been reported 
correctly,memory swaps,
or connected with Bob Friesenhahn current threat on system monitor 
issues ?

I am not a developer but would appriciate any advice on how to proceed.

Regards,


Robert


What does zpool list and zfs list report?

rgs,
toomas









___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Insufficient Disk space for updates reported

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I have used the Beadm Destroy -s tool to manually remove backup copies 
and liberated much needed space. Then used update and fixed some errors 
with pkg fix .


Everything seems to be back to normal. This to me is a good educational 
exercise in solving such issues in the future.


Thank you for your help.

Robert Jones


On 14/07/2021 13:28, Till Wegmueller wrote:

Hello bscuk2

You have about a Years worth of boot environments.

To reclaim used disk space use beadm destroy to delete old boot 
environments.

You can use beadm list to show the boot environments of the System.

Boot environments are created as part of the update proces to make 
updates Atomic.


Unfortunately you will have to go through this manually or with a 
shell script loop now.


I heavily advise against using snapshot pruning ontop of boot 
environments. This is likely to get your system killed if configured 
bad. Boot environments are also not snapshots, but clones of the 
dataset. So snapshot pruning will not delete them.


Hope this helps
-Till

On 13.07.21 11:29, bscuk2 wrote:

openindiana-2020:05:29 - - 240.71M static 2020-05-29 09:12
openindiana-2020:05:29-backup-1- - 
198Kstatic 2020-05-30 14:39
pre_napp-it-18.12  - - 
200Kstatic 2020-05-31 14:46
pre_amp_setup_1590937525   - - 
206Kstatic 2020-05-31 15:05
openindiana-2020:06:01 - - 
2.31M   static 2020-06-01 12:01
openindiana-2020:06:01-backup-1- - 
163Kstatic 2020-06-02 09:44
openindiana-2020:06:03 - - 
2.51M   static 2020-06-03 14:26
openindiana-2020:06:04 - - 
713Kstatic 2020-06-04 10:25
pre_nextcloud_setup_1591303568 - - 
150Kstatic 2020-06-04 20:46
openindiana-2020:06:05 - - 
2.60M   static 2020-06-05 10:49
openindiana-2020:06:07 - - 
2.47M   static 2020-06-07 21:42
openindiana-2020:06:07-backup-1- - 
163Kstatic 2020-06-08 13:00
openindiana-2020:06:09 - - 
71.23M  static 2020-06-09 08:07
openindiana-2020:06:10 - - 
2.64M   static 2020-06-10 13:52
pre_nextcloud_setup_1591797209 - - 
168Kstatic 2020-06-10 13:53
openindiana-2020:06:10-backup-1- - 
143Kstatic 2020-06-11 21:29
openindiana-2020:06:14 - - 
62.44M  static 2020-06-14 11:36
openindiana-2020:06:14-backup-1- - 
146Kstatic 2020-06-15 20:00
openindiana-2020:06:18 - - 
156.49M static 2020-06-18 06:47
openindiana-2020:06:19 - - 
2.63M   static 2020-06-19 09:46
openindiana-2020:06:20 - - 
279.74M static 2020-06-20 10:25
openindiana-2020:06:24 - - 
2.80M   static 2020-06-24 10:43
openindiana-2020:06:27 - - 
60.67M  static 2020-06-27 12:23
openindiana-2020:06:29 - - 
3.14M   static 2020-06-29 11:37
openindiana-2020:06:30 - - 
3.12M   static 2020-06-30 09:58
openindiana-2020:07:01 - - 
3.11M   static 2020-07-01 10:45
openindiana-2020:07:01-backup-1- - 
159Kstatic 2020-07-02 14:21
openindiana-2020:07:04 - - 
103.79M static 2020-07-04 12:17
openindiana-2020:07:07 - - 
3.23M   static 2020-07-07 12:05
openindiana-2020:07:08 - - 
3.28M   static 2020-07-08 11:22
openindiana-2020:07:09 - - 
21.12M  static 2020-07-09 09:39
openindiana-2020:07:11 - - 
3.39M   static 2020-07-11 13:32
openindiana-2020:07:13 - - 
10.23M  static 2020-07-13 21:50
openindiana-2020:07:14 - - 
3.38M   static 2020-07-14 09:42
openindiana-2020:07:14-backup-1- - 
9.86M   static 2020-07-15 12:37
openindiana-2020:07:16 - - 
321.44M static 2020-07-16 13:31
openindiana-2020:07:16-1   - - 
3.28M   static 2020-07-16 13:56
openindiana-2020:07:16-1-backup-1  - - 
185Kstatic 2020-07-17 15:15
openindiana-2020:07:19 - - 
3.49M   static 2020-07-19 11:15
openindiana-2020:07:22 - - 
3.54M   static 2020-07-22 15:14
openindiana-2020:07:24 - - 
3.47M   static 2020-07-24 09:44
openindiana

[OpenIndiana-discuss] System update unable to boot

[bscuk2]

Dear All,

I update my system and also experienced difficulties in starting the 
system. The system either gavea message outlining failure to find zfs or 
rpool on boot up and booting into black screen. I have reflashed the 
bios and managed to restore a booting system.


Hope this helps for anyone experiencing the same issues.

Regards


Robert Jones


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox security

[bscuk2]

Has anyone considered lightspark as a substitute for flash on Oi?

On 18/11/2012 18:19, Jim Klimov wrote:

On 2012-11-18 18:00, cpforum wrote:
Firefox, Java and Thunderbird are very old releases. Gnome Desktop is 
not maintened and applications like OpenOffice, Flash, Adobe Reader, 
etc. are 2 or 3 years old with a lot of known security holes.


Speaking of which: some of these projects are opensource, others
are proprietary - even if distributed by authors for free.

Is there any lineup of such products as Java, Adobe Reader and
Flash, OpenOffice or its more current descendants, Mozilla stuff,
VirtualBox (GPL half, at least) - what may be redistributed how?

For example, whenever a new JDK/JRE comes out, can we publish its
files into the OI IPS repo as a new version of the appropriate
package, or the license states that the end-user must download
the software from original vendor's site (like in VBox PUEL)?

I don't think it is a fundamental problem to fire up a repository
of third-party software which would suck in and republish as IPS
the tarballs and packages made by other projects (like Mozilla,
Java, VirtualBox, etc.etc.etc.) - if we know we're not to be sued
for making such a repo. Possibly this can be done as part of the
existing SFE or SFE-encumbered repos (skipping the manual build
part by the repo maintainer)?

For projects with well standardized releases, sucking-in of the new
versions can be quite automated (similar to spec files or recipes
in the userland gate), and end-users would have a simple automated
means of receiving the new software in a timely manner...

My 2c,
//Jim


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox security

[bscuk2]

The latest Firerfox releases do play HTLM 5 format videos without the 
need for flash perhaps an argument to keep updated on Firerfox.


On 19/11/2012 12:48, Jonathan Adams wrote:

we're looking at incomplete solutions, have you taken a look at:
https://github.com/mozilla/shumway


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Tentative listing : Webcam experience with OI.

[bscuk2]

Perhaps you should also examine Android Mobile devices which could 
fulfill this function too there seems to be development in the Android 
community on this Topic?


On 05/12/2012 18:11, Aurélien Larcher wrote:

Hi,
for those of us who work with OI as a desktop.
Suddenly today, I just noticed that I've been using my thinkpad running
Debian in the past months just to chat with my colleagues and never thought
that my webcam might work on the lab workstation running OI 151a7...
But I works perfectly in Ekiga for resolutions  < 640x480, after there are
some glitches which could be fixed :) Just enough to work :)

So here is an attempt to list the working webcams:

- Logitech Portable Webcam C905, Detected YES, Video YES up to 640x480,
Sound YES
- Logitech Quickcam V-UAM37, Detected YES, Video NO, Sound YES

If this email gets replies, I would like to list the supported webcams on a
wiki page.

Best,

Aurelien



--
If you realize that all things change, there is nothing you will try to 
hold on to. If you are not afraid of dying, there is nothing you cannot 
achieve. Lao Tzu This transmission is intended to be private and 
confidential.Intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it 
is addressed.It may contain privileged and confidential information.If 
you are not the intended recipient,you should not copy,distribute or 
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this 
transmission in error,please notify the sender at the e-mail address 
above. Thank you.

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] opensolaris.org shutting down next month

[bscuk2]

As a point of interest are you able to transfer any information to 
openindiana.org under copywright rules or is the information unrestricted?



Rob

On 14/02/2013 07:59, Carsten Grzemba wrote:

It is legal to make self a clone on github on special content (.e.g. samqfs)?

Am 14.02.13 schrieb Stefan Müller-Wilken:

Hi Chris,

you're right, most of the information is still available somewhere. But not as 
concentrated and cross-linked as on opensolaris.org. And if not for the 
information as such, I sometimes just click around on it to remind myself of 
the energy and excitement that was literally humming through its pages back 
then.

Well, one more reason to intensify work on OI now, right? :-)

Cheers,
  Stefan


Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: Guido 
Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



--
If you realize that all things change, there is nothing you will try to 
hold on to. If you are not afraid of dying, there is nothing you cannot 
achieve. Lao Tzu This transmission is intended to be private and 
confidential.Intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it 
is addressed.It may contain privileged and confidential information.If 
you are not the intended recipient,you should not copy,distribute or 
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this 
transmission in error,please notify the sender at the e-mail address 
above. Thank you.

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sonicle XStreamOS repo and XStream Desktop in progress

[bscuk2]

Suggestions


 * Integrators management panel with password protect
 * VLC integrated as default you tube player
 * More multimedia drivers especially for webconferencing
 * Conky information scripts
 * cairo dock
 * reduced start up time by compressing language defaults
 * Better icons for visually impaired
 * make a start on touch screen drivers are these available at General
   Dynmacs and Tadpole?
 * clamv antivirus and syphos sponsorship?



On 15/05/2013 10:28, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:

LXDE desktop



--
If you realize that all things change, there is nothing you will try to 
hold on to. If you are not afraid of dying, there is nothing you cannot 
achieve. Lao Tzu This transmission is intended to be private and 
confidential.Intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it 
is addressed.It may contain privileged and confidential information.If 
you are not the intended recipient,you should not copy,distribute or 
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this 
transmission in error,please notify the sender at the e-mail address 
above. Thank you.

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Android USB tethering on openindiana

[bscuk2]

laptop tethering still works via wifi on Android however had no luck
with cable tethering. http://oiosunix.blogspot.co.uk/

Rob


On 14/06/2013 13:36, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> Am 14.06.13 schrieb Jim Klimov  :
>> On 2013-06-14 13:50, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> has somebody experience with usb tethering of android phones for 
>>> Openindiana or other Solarises.
>>> Could this work like a usb network card?
>> No, I haven't tried it with OI, but I did it with linux many years back
>> (like ten years or more, when GPRS was just appearing around here).
>> At that time the phone was presented to the OS like a USB (or even
>> native, with its cable?) serial port, and the modem-dialling software
>> was configured to use it with the connection strings from the cellular
>> provider. I think this ultimately performed as a proper traffic-rated
>> (not time-rated dialup) service.
>>
>> So, this is what I'd expect from GPRS-modeming today, if I were to
>> need restarting my attempts. As for tethering - I think the term
>> describes the use of an (android) phone as a local Wifi access point
>> with GPRS WAN connection. Or does it apply to USB and other links
>> (BlueTooth? IrDA?) as well?
>>
> android phones support tethering to the computer via usb and bluetooth. But 
> for me is USB ok and enough.
> This works on Linux (Ubuntu) out of the box. I guess it is provieded as an 
> usb network card.
> To the internet it should work with WIFI or GPRS/UMTS.
>
>
>> //Jim
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
>> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>
>>
> ___
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Oios ????? Re: mailinglist oios

[bscuk2]

openindiana was a project name in the past but it evolved to oi and oios 
as branding and search engine necessities moved it on. Clearly I am not 
now keen on calling it Hipster now as people suggest. Keep it as it is 
oi or oios.



On 11/02/2017 21:32, Nikola M wrote:

On 01/30/17 01:36 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote:

Came across this post searching my personal archives for something else.


I got under impression it's just a nickname he likes to call Openindiana.
Didn't spread much as branding is Openindiana / OI.



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] To the OmniOS, OI and SmartOS community

[bscuk2]

Hello,

My comment was simply to frame the direction of travel in todays 
changing environment. When the question is considered everyone must have a


Common shared vision

Road map to acheive that

Focus upon where that road map is

I am very happy if this common relationship can be agreed . My point is 
that a frame of reference is very important to understand the people of 
their relationships so a common direction can be forged.


Peter


On 18/05/2017 20:55, Guenther Ernst Alka wrote:

hello Peter

Thank you for your comment.
You have a better insight view into communities and distributions than I.
My view is mostly a storage related user view and from that pure Illumos
features are ok. A GUI or LX zones are really nice but not essential 
and no one

would hinder to add LX to OI or Mate to OmniOS.

I mainly want to trust a distribution to survive and to care about bugs.
Currently we have a OmniOS LTS and the next one is due 2019.
Until then we need a OmniOS to maintain the current LTS.

But the question on what the next OmniOS is based onto must be
answered now, not in two years or when work is mostly done .
The future of OmniOS as a stable free Illumos is insecure enough.

best regards

Gea


Am 18.05.2017 um 20:21 schrieb Peter Tribble:

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Guenther Alka  wrote:

There are many users who want exact these OmniOS features not 
available in

OI.
The discussion now is if such an effort should be based on the current
OmniOS bloody
or can be based on a common development effort together with the OI
community.

I want the discussion going into a common future as I fear that a new
separate OmniOS community effort will only weaken Illumos/OI and cannot
survive in the long term.  My hope is that a stronger OI/OmniOS is the
outcome instead where OmniOS is a stable add-on feature for OI 
snapshots.



I don't think that's viable, at least in the short term. OmniOS has a
completely different ethos to OI, and there's a reason people chose
one distro or the other.

Attempting to force both requirements out of a single distro will likely
mean that you end up satisfying neither set of users, while making it
much harder for maintainers who have to support both sets of users.

Longer term is a slightly different picture. It's unlikely that OmniOS
will continue to diverge from illumos, and I would like to see the
features backported into illumos proper. Once that's done it makes
more sense to think about sharing, because at least you then have
a common illumos codebase.



Am 18.05.2017 um 11:24 schrieb Alexander Pyhalov:


On 05/18/17 12:15 PM, Guenther Alka wrote:


News about OmniOS and Discuss about free Illumos distributions and
future OmniOS/OI options

I have started a thread in a popular forum with a strong ZFS focus to
discuss this
also with regular users outside the maillists.

https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/omnios-151
022-long-term-stable.14367/page-2


Hi.
So far, as I understand, OmniOS developers choose to support existing
infrastructure and build systems and there's no development on 
merging OI
and OmniOS code base. Without OmniOS developers interested in this, 
this

talk is useless.



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss










___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss