[okular] [Bug 456434] New: Okular does not handle markdown comments

2022-07-07 Thread Marián Konček
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456434

Bug ID: 456434
   Summary: Okular does not handle markdown comments
   Product: okular
   Version: 21.12.2
  Platform: Fedora RPMs
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: NOR
 Component: markdown backend
  Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org
  Reporter: koncek.mar...@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---

(Tested on Fedora 35)
If a markdown document contains (or at least starts with XML comments in the
form of ``, Then it does not render the rest of the document
properly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 456414] inline notes does not support RTL (bidirectional text support and shaping)

2022-07-07 Thread Zayed Al-Saidi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456414

--- Comment #2 from Zayed Al-Saidi  ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #1)
> Do I understand that you're saying that both lines of text should be
> rendered the same?
Yes. They should be rendered the same.

> Not even Adobe Reader is doing that https://i.imgur.com/59UpQfa.png  
It is a bug in Adobe Reader :) and I can't report it because it is a closed
software. 

> Which if I'm not making a mistake is exactly the same that Okular renders,
> no?
Unfortunately, you are correct.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 456430] Add PDF digital signatures

2022-07-07 Thread Albert Astals Cid
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456430

Albert Astals Cid  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
 CC||aa...@kde.org
 Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid  ---
> I'm fairly new to Linux so I'm sure I've made a mistake somewhere

You have, don't try to compile stuff if you don't know what you're doing.

My personal recommendation is that you use Okular from flathub if your
distribution doesn't provide one recent enough.

https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.kde.okular

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 456430] Add PDF digital signatures

2022-07-07 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456430

--- Comment #2 from owasch...@gmail.com ---
Flathub, got it. Thanks very much for your help!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 456381] Respect Config Option to Not Notify about Embedded Signatures

2022-07-07 Thread Billy McCann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456381

--- Comment #2 from Billy McCann  ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #1)
> Can you attach a file that shows this problem?

Looking for a file that both does this behavior and doesn't exceed the upload
file size limit has led to a small discovery. That is, it's only certain files
that exhibit this behavior. When I found a test pdf online[1] that contains
both forms and signatures, Okular behaves exactly as I expect with regards to
the notification options. 

The only pdfs that exhibit this behavior are very large files that have been
shared with me by clients. And the most common message I see is "This document
is digitally signed. There have been changes since last signed." 

Should that notification regarding the digital signature not be suppressed by
the configuration option?

[1]https://kbdeveloper.qoppa.com/wp-content/uploads/blank_signed.pdf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.