Re: [nexa] Tom Lehrer e pubblico dominio

[deborah de angelis]

Ciao a tutti e buon anno.

Grazie, Juan Carlos, della condivisione e grazie, Marco, dello scambio di
opinione.

Su questo punto non sono d'accordo:

>1) non mettere in public domain, ma rilicenziare con una CC permissiva
ocomunque una licenza libera, per evitare riappropriazioni.

Creative Commons non incentiva l'applicazione di licenze di diritto
d'autore a contenuti che sono in pubblico dominio, qualora non ci sia un
materiale proteggibile, vedi una rileaborazione creativa.
Nuovi diritti non possono sorgere dalla riproduzione fedele di materiali in
PD.

Un caro saluto

Deborah






DDA Studio Legale

Avv. Deborah De Angelis
00195 Roma (RM), Piazza Giuseppe Mazzini, 27
Tel. +39 06 37410182
www.ddastudiolegale.it
i...@ddastudiolegale.it
skype: deb.dda


Il presente messaggio, corredato dei relativi allegati contiene
informazioni da considerarsi strettamente riservate, ed è destinato
esclusivamente al destinatario sopra indicato.
Chiunque ricevesse questo messaggio per errore o comunque lo leggesse senza
esserne legittimato è avvertito che trattenerlo, copiarlo, divulgarlo,
distribuirlo a persone diverse dal destinatario è severamente proibito e,
nel caso, è pregato di rinviarlo immediatamente al mittente distruggendo
l'originale.
This message, together with its annexes, contains information to be
deemed strictly confidential and is destined only to the

addressee(s) identified above. If anyone received this message by
mistake or reads it without entitlement is forewarned that

keeping, copying, disseminating or distributing this message to
persons other than the addressee(s) is strictly forbidden and is
 asked to transmit it immediately to the sender and to erase the
original message received.


Il giorno lun 9 gen 2023 alle ore 10:37 Marco A. Calamari <
marcoc_maill...@marcoc.it> ha scritto:

> Ottima cosa; avrei solo 4 suggerimenti per chi volesse emularlo in futuro.
>
> 1) non mettere in public domain, ma rilicenziare con una CC permissiva
> ocomunque una licenza libera, per evitare riappropriazioni.
> 2) far revisionare il testo della sua liberatoria da un legale (credo
> qualsiasi organizzazione impegnata lo farebbe) in particolare per il
> materiale già licenziato.
> 3) "liberare" anche tutte le sue performance, anche se registrate da
> terzi; sono altri diritti.
> 4) archiviare il documento e tutte le canzoni su archive.org e magari
> anche altri servizi di archiviazione.
>
>
> On dom, 2023-01-08 at 09:56 +0100, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote:
>
> Il leggendario Tom Lehrer, classe 1928, autore, oltre al resto, della
> famosa canzone "The Elements", ha messo nel pubblico dominio
> tutte le sue creazioni:
>
> https://tomlehrersongs.com/
>
> Augurandogli ancora numerosi anni di vita (compirà 95 anni in aprile),
> la sua decisione dona alla collettività le sue opere con un anticipo
> di almeno 70 anni... grazie, Maestro!
>
> jc
>
>
> DISCLAIMER STATEMENT
>
> I, Tom Lehrer, and the Tom Lehrer Trust 2007, hereby grant the following
> permissions:
> All copyrights to lyrics or music written or composed by me have been
> relinquished, and therefore such songs are now in the public domain. All
> of my songs that have never been copyrighted, having been available for
> free for so long, are now also in the public domain.
> The latter includes all lyrics which I have written to music by others,
> although the music to such parodies, if copyrighted by their composers,
> are of course not included without permission of their copyright owners.
> The translated songs on this website may be found on YouTube in their
> original languages.
> Performing and recording rights to all of my songs are included in this
> permission. Translation rights are also included.
> In particular, permission is hereby granted to anyone to set any of
> these lyrics to their own music, or to set any of this music to their
> own lyrics, and to publish or perform their parodies or distortions of
> these songs without payment or fear of legal action.
> Some recording, movie, and television rights to songs written by me are
> merely licensed non-exclusively by me to recording, movie, or TV
> companies. All such rights are now released herewith and therefore do
> not require any permission from me or from Maelstrom Music, which is
> merely me in another hat, nor from the recording, movie, or TV companies
> involved.
> In short, I no longer retain any rights to any of my songs.
> So help yourselves, and don’t send me any money.
>
> NOTICE:
> THIS WEBSITE WILL BE SHUT DOWN AT SOME DATE IN THE NOT TOO DISTANT
> FUTURE, SO IF YOU WANT TO DOWNLOAD ANYTHING, DON’T WAIT TOO LONG.
>
> Tom Lehrer
>
> November 1, 2022
> ___
> nexa mailing list
> nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
>
>
> ___
> nexa mailing list
> nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-

[nexa] Seattle schools sue tech giants over youth mental health crisis

[Alberto Cammozzo via nexa]

Seattle Public Schools is suing social media companies including TikTok and 
Meta, saying the tech giants' "misconduct has been a substantial factor in 
causing a youth mental health crisis."

Driving the news: "This mental health crisis is no accident. It is the result 
of the Defendants’ deliberate choices and affirmative actions to design and 
market their social media platforms to attract youth," the lawsuit states.

"Defendants have successfully exploited the vulnerable brains of youth, hooking 
tens of millions of students across the country into positive feedback loops of 
excessive use and abuse of Defendants' social media platforms," the complaint, 
which was filed Friday, says.

The lawsuit alleges that the defendants have violated Washington state's public 
nuisance law. 

What they're saying: "We have invested heavily in creating safe experiences for 
children across our platforms and have introduced strong protections and 
dedicated features to prioritize their wellbeing," Google spokesperson José 
Castañeda said in a statement. 

"For example, through Family Link, we provide parents with the ability to set 
reminders, limit screen time and block specific types of content on supervised 
devices," Castañeda said.

“While we can’t comment on the specifics of active litigation, nothing is more 
important to us than the wellbeing of our community," a Snap spokesperson said 
in a statement.

"We will continue working to make sure our platform is safe and to give 
Snapchatters dealing with mental health issues resources to help them deal with 
the challenges facing young people today," the Snap spokesperson continued.

TikTok won't comment on pending litigation, but a spokesperson shared with 
Axios some information on how the app "prioritizes the safety and well-being of 
teens," including age-restricted features and break reminders, among others.

Meanwhile, Antigone Davis, global head of safety at Meta, said in a statement 
that the firm wanted teens to be safe online. 

"We've developed more than 30 tools to support teens and families, including 
supervision tools that let parents limit the amount of time their teens spend 
on Instagram, and age verification technology that helps teens have 
age-appropriate experiences," Davis added.

"We'll continue to work closely with experts, policymakers and parents on these 
important issues.”

The big picture: Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen in 2021 testified that 
the tech giant is aware that some of its platforms are harmful to certain 
populations, including teenagers, but targets them anyway. 

The lawsuit said that from 2009 to 2019, there was an average 30% increase in 
the number of students at Seattle Public Schools who reported feeling "so sad 
or hopeless almost every day for two weeks or more in a row that [they] stopped 
doing some usual activities." 

___
nexa mailing list
nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Re: [nexa] Tom Lehrer e pubblico dominio

[Marco A. Calamari]

On mar, 2023-01-10 at 11:48 +, deborah de angelis wrote:
> Ciao a tutti e buon anno.
> 
> Grazie, Juan Carlos, della condivisione e grazie, Marco, dello scambio di
> opinione.
> 
> Su questo punto non sono d'accordo:
> 
> >1) non mettere in public domain, ma rilicenziare con una CC permissiva
> ocomunque una licenza libera, per evitare riappropriazioni.
> 
> Creative Commons non incentiva l'applicazione di licenze di diritto d'autore a
> contenuti che sono in pubblico dominio, qualora non ci sia un materiale
> proteggibile, vedi una rileaborazione creativa.
> Nuovi diritti non possono sorgere dalla riproduzione fedele di materiali in
> PD.

Intendevo letteralmente "non mettere il materiale in PD"  ma piuttosto in CC; se
il materiale è già in PD hai ovviamente ragione.

> Un caro saluto
> 
> Deborah
> 
> 
> 
> DDA Studio Legale
> 
> Avv. Deborah De Angelis
> 00195 Roma (RM), Piazza Giuseppe Mazzini, 27
> Tel. +39 0637410182
> www.ddastudiolegale.it
> i...@ddastudiolegale.it
> skype: deb.dda
> 
> 
> Il presente messaggio, corredato dei relativi allegati contiene informazioni
> da considerarsi strettamente riservate, ed è destinato esclusivamente
> al destinatario sopra indicato.
> Chiunque ricevesse questo messaggio per errore o comunque lo leggesse senza
> esserne legittimato è avvertito che trattenerlo, copiarlo, divulgarlo,
> distribuirlo a persone diverse dal destinatario è severamente proibito e, nel
> caso, è pregato di rinviarlo immediatamente al mittente distruggendo
> l'originale.
> This message, together with its annexes, contains information to be deemed str
> ictly confidential and is destined only to the 
> addressee(s) identified above. If anyone received this message by mistake or r
> eads it without entitlement is forewarned that 
> keeping, copying, disseminating or distributing this message to persons other 
> than the addressee(s) is strictly forbidden and is
>  asked to transmit it immediately to the sender and to erase the original mess
> age received. 
> 
> 
> Il giorno lun 9 gen 2023 alle ore 10:37 Marco A. Calamari
>  ha scritto:
> > Ottima cosa; avrei solo 4 suggerimenti per chi volesse emularlo in futuro.
> > 
> > 1) non mettere in public domain, ma rilicenziare con una CC permissiva
> > ocomunque una licenza libera, per evitare riappropriazioni.
> > 2) far revisionare il testo della sua liberatoria da un legale (credo
> > qualsiasi organizzazione impegnata lo farebbe) in particolare per il
> > materiale già licenziato.
> > 3) "liberare" anche tutte le sue performance, anche se registrate da terzi;
> > sono altri diritti.
> > 4) archiviare il documento e tutte le canzoni su archive.org e magari anche
> > altri servizi di archiviazione.
> > 
> > 
> > On dom, 2023-01-08 at 09:56 +0100, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote:
> > > Il leggendario Tom Lehrer, classe 1928, autore, oltre al resto, della
> > > famosa canzone "The Elements", ha messo nel pubblico dominio
> > > tutte le sue creazioni:
> > > 
> > > https://tomlehrersongs.com/
> > > 
> > > Augurandogli ancora numerosi anni di vita (compirà 95 anni in aprile),
> > > la sua decisione dona alla collettività le sue opere con un anticipo
> > > di almeno 70 anni... grazie, Maestro!
> > > 
> > > jc
> > > 
> > > 
> > > DISCLAIMER STATEMENT
> > > 
> > > I, Tom Lehrer, and the Tom Lehrer Trust 2007, hereby grant the following 
> > > permissions:
> > > All copyrights to lyrics or music written or composed by me have been 
> > > relinquished, and therefore such songs are now in the public domain. All 
> > > of my songs that have never been copyrighted, having been available for 
> > > free for so long, are now also in the public domain.
> > > The latter includes all lyrics which I have written to music by others, 
> > > although the music to such parodies, if copyrighted by their composers, 
> > > are of course not included without permission of their copyright owners. 
> > > The translated songs on this website may be found on YouTube in their 
> > > original languages.
> > > Performing and recording rights to all of my songs are included in this 
> > > permission. Translation rights are also included.
> > > In particular, permission is hereby granted to anyone to set any of 
> > > these lyrics to their own music, or to set any of this music to their 
> > > own lyrics, and to publish or perform their parodies or distortions of 
> > > these songs without payment or fear of legal action.
> > > Some recording, movie, and television rights to songs written by me are 
> > > merely licensed non-exclusively by me to recording, movie, or TV 
> > > companies. All such rights are now released herewith and therefore do 
> > > not require any permission from me or from Maelstrom Music, which is 
> > > merely me in another hat, nor from the recording, movie, or TV companies 
> > > involved.
> > > In short, I no longer retain any rights to any of my songs.
> > > So help yourselves, and don’t send me any money.
> > >