Incompatible site?
On Netsurf - all versions I have, including 3.0 (Dev# 975) Netsurf crashes out on trying to access www.itproportal.com/2013/02/19/10-tips-for-the-samsung-galaxy-s3/ Works fine on my laptop Win7 John -- /____ /Mail fromm...@johnwoodhouse.plus.com . . . using RISC OS 5.16 on an XScale powered Iyonix computer.
Re: Incompatible site?
In article <532dd15104m...@johnwoodhouse.plus.com>, wrote: > On Netsurf - all versions I have, including 3.0 (Dev# 975) Netsurf crashes > out on trying to access > www.itproportal.com/2013/02/19/10-tips-for-the-samsung-galaxy-s3/ Seems ok here on 5.19 Iyonix and dev#966. -- Chris Johnson
Re: Incompatible site?
In message <532dd15104m...@johnwoodhouse.plus.com> wrote: > On Netsurf - all versions I have, including 3.0 (Dev# 975) Netsurf crashes > out on trying to access > www.itproportal.com/2013/02/19/10-tips-for-the-samsung-galaxy-s3/ > Works fine on my laptop Win7 Same with me. John. Using version 5.18 with 3.0 (Dev# 973) Netsurf crashes Alan --
Re: Incompatible site?
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 11:49:40 + (GMT), wrote: > > On Netsurf - all versions I have, including 3.0 (Dev# 975) Netsurf crashes > out on trying to access > www.itproportal.com/2013/02/19/10-tips-for-the-samsung-galaxy-s3/ It's ok here if I go straight to the site. If I then go to Google and try and navigate back to that site (with direct URL input) the whole thing freezes up. That's on the Amiga version. I've been seeing crashes in dom_hubbub_parser_destroy recently (and not systematically reproducably) that may be related. Chris
Re: Incompatible site?
On 17 Mar 2013 13:14:39 +0100, Chris Young wrote: > On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 11:49:40 + (GMT), wrote: > > > > > On Netsurf - all versions I have, including 3.0 (Dev# 975) Netsurf crashes > > out on trying to access > > www.itproportal.com/2013/02/19/10-tips-for-the-samsung-galaxy-s3/ > > It's ok here if I go straight to the site. If I then go to Google and > try and navigate back to that site (with direct URL input) the whole > thing freezes up. That's on the Amiga version. I'm getting: assertion "(box->width != UNKNOWN_WIDTH) && (box->height != AUTO)" failed: file "render/layout.c", line 5026 Log here: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/cdyoung/tmp/ns.log.gz > I've been seeing crashes in dom_hubbub_parser_destroy recently (and > not systematically reproducably) that may be related. Looks like these aren't related, so I'll have to keep looking for that one. Chris
Imae problems with Netsurt
Recent builds of Netsurf have gone backwards on images, Try http://www.flickr.com/photos/barkingbill/ The initial page displays correctly but, when you click on one of the thumbnails you find that the little strip of images is missing with just the black square showing which is the selected picture appearing. That's with Javascript turned off. setting Javascript on means that the main picture doesn't appear either. -- David Wild using RISC OS on broadband www.davidhwild.me.uk
Re: Incompatible site?
In article <63d4d52d53.a...@ntlworld.com>, Rev Dr Alan Leighton wrote: > In message <532dd15104m...@johnwoodhouse.plus.com> >wrote: > > On Netsurf - all versions I have, including 3.0 (Dev# 975) Netsurf crashes > > out on trying to access > > www.itproportal.com/2013/02/19/10-tips-for-the-samsung-galaxy-s3/ > > Works fine on my laptop Win7 > Same with me. John. Using version 5.18 with 3.0 (Dev# 973) Netsurf > crashes Serious error here too. #974 RiscPC 700 Strong Arm Adjust 4.39 with Unipod -- Chris
Choices behaviour
Hi, I thought Netsurf kept its choices within !Boot. & indeed here I have.. IDEFS::h-4.$.!Boot.Choices.Users.Single.WWW.NetSurf.Choices However, if from the iconbar I set - Content - Disable Java script unticked, every time I reload netsurfm the tick is back. I don't think this happened previously. Has something changed? Have I missed somthing? -- Chris
Re: Choices behaviour
On 17 Mar, Chris Newman wrote in message <532df6c0f8cvj...@waitrose.com>: > I thought Netsurf kept its choices within !Boot. & indeed here I have.. > > IDEFS::h-4.$.!Boot.Choices.Users.Single.WWW.NetSurf.Choices > > However, if from the iconbar I set - Content - Disable Java script > unticked, every time I reload netsurfm the tick is back. I don't think > this happened previously. Has something changed? Have I missed somthing? Are you sure that you're not using a "jsoff" build? IIRC that forces the config option to be set regardless of what is in the Choices file. -- Steve Fryatt - Leeds, England Wakefield Acorn & RISC OS Show Saturday 20 April 2013 http://www.stevefryatt.org.uk/ http://www.wakefieldshow.org.uk/
Re: Choices behaviour
Chris Newman wrote > Hi, > I thought Netsurf kept its choices within !Boot. & indeed here I have.. > IDEFS::h-4.$.!Boot.Choices.Users.Single.WWW.NetSurf.Choices > However, if from the iconbar I set - Content - Disable Java script unticked, > every time I reload netsurfm the tick is back. I don't think this happened > previously. Has something changed? Have I missed somthing? I can't reproduce this here (Iyonix 5.19) NS #971 works - and just updated to #975 also preserves choices. John -- John Rickman - http://rickman.orpheusweb.co.uk/lynx
Re: Choices behaviour
In article , Steve Fryatt wrote: > On 17 Mar, Chris Newman wrote in message > <532df6c0f8cvj...@waitrose.com>: > > I thought Netsurf kept its choices within !Boot. & indeed here I have.. > > > > IDEFS::h-4.$.!Boot.Choices.Users.Single.WWW.NetSurf.Choices > > > > However, if from the iconbar I set - Content - Disable Java script > > unticked, every time I reload netsurfm the tick is back. I don't think > > this happened previously. Has something changed? Have I missed somthing? > Are you sure that you're not using a "jsoff" build? IIRC that forces the > config option to be set regardless of what is in the Choices file. Could well be. You've just triggered my brain in to action (a grim task). Looking at !Fetch_NS which I use, the default is to download the JSOFF version. I need to change the settings File. I'll explore that. Many thanks. -- Chris
Re: Choices behaviour
In article <532df87232cvj...@waitrose.com>, Chris Newman wrote: > In article , >Steve Fryatt wrote: > > On 17 Mar, Chris Newman wrote in message > > <532df6c0f8cvj...@waitrose.com>: > > > I thought Netsurf kept its choices within !Boot. & indeed here I have.. > > > > > > IDEFS::h-4.$.!Boot.Choices.Users.Single.WWW.NetSurf.Choices > > > > > > However, if from the iconbar I set - Content - Disable Java script > > > unticked, every time I reload netsurfm the tick is back. I don't think > > > this happened previously. Has something changed? Have I missed somthing? > > Are you sure that you're not using a "jsoff" build? IIRC that forces the > > config option to be set regardless of what is in the Choices file. > Could well be. You've just triggered my brain in to action (a grim task). > Looking at !Fetch_NS which I use, the default is to download the JSOFF > version. I need to change the settings File. I'll explore that. Many thanks. In reply to my reply.. The file I needed to alter was. !Fetch_NS.Resources.Defaults I've done that now but can't test it until the next version of Netsurf is available. Thanks for your help. -- Chris
Re: Choices behaviour
In article <532df8decacvj...@waitrose.com>, Chris Newman wrote: > The file I needed to alter was. > !Fetch_NS.Resources.Defaults Only if you deleted the file .Fetch_NS.Settings. The Defaults file is only used (and copied as Settings to Fetch_NS's Choices directory) if a Settings file does not exist there already. Regards, Frank
Re: Choices behaviour
In article <532e0b195anetsurf-users-...@aconet.nl>, Frank de Bruijn wrote: > In article <532df8decacvj...@waitrose.com>, >Chris Newman wrote: > > The file I needed to alter was. > > !Fetch_NS.Resources.Defaults > Only if you deleted the file .Fetch_NS.Settings. > The Defaults file is only used (and copied as Settings to Fetch_NS's > Choices directory) if a Settings file does not exist there already. Thanks. I think I've found the right one now. I have Adjust 4.39 so the settings file seemed to be here... IDEFS::h-4.$.!Boot.Choices.Users.Single.Fetch_NS.Settings I've changed that as well so fingers crossed. Unfortunately, the Fetch_NS help file didn't specify too clearly where I should look. -- Chris
