Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread Dr Alan Leighton
In message 
  David Pitt  wrote:

> Michael Bell  wrote:

>> In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker>
>>   John-Mark Bell  wrote:

> The NetSurf developers have done a very good job with version 2.50, if this
> is the end of the road due to lack of RISC OS developers then 2.50 is a
> reasonably good place to be.

It is a big step further and with JavaScript it would be even more 
delightful.

Thanks to all the guys who have worked on the project.

Cheers

Alan


-- 



Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread Michael Bell
In message 
  David Pitt  wrote:

> Michael Bell  wrote:

>> In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker>
>>   John-Mark Bell  wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
 In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org>
   Michael Drake  wrote:
 
 
> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate
> availability of NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes
> and improvements.
 
> It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/

> [snip - incomplete log]

>>> We cannot reproduce this, and the log file you provided contains
>>> insufficient information to allow us to debug this successfully. Do you
>>> still have the full log file? If so, please zip it and email it to me
>>> (off list).

>> Sorry, I have re-visited the sites which it tripped up on, and it worked
>> OK, so I can't do this.
>> 
>> Actually I am not a very competent RISC OS user, I am not sure I correctly
>> downloaded NetSurf and I am not sure how to zip file, I never have to do
>> it.

> Is SparkFS on the machine? If not there are alternatives which can be talked
> through.

>> Do you want me to send in any further bug reports?

> I could not reproduce the crash here, but something tripped up NetSurf and
> that is of interest to the developers, if something can happen it will
> happen - again.

> The original full log does need to have been preserved, if it has been
> overwritten then the evidence is lost.

>> It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further. Maybe I
>> should have come to Wakefield.

> The NetSurf developers have done a very good job with version 2.50, if this
> is the end of the road due to lack of RISC OS developers then 2.50 is a
> reasonably good place to be.

Now I think about it, I have got SparkFS on my machine, so I could 
used that. The original log has been lost.

Michael Bell

-- 



Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread David Pitt
Michael Bell  wrote:

[snip - NetSurf 2.50 crash]

> The original log has been lost.

To preserve a log, quit NetSurf if it is still running then rename the log
file.

-- 
David Pitt



Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 25 Apr 2010  Michael Bell  wrote:

[snip]

> It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further. Maybe I
> should have come to Wakefield.

Not so, I think. Since 2.5 came out there have been several updates on 
the test builds page, at least one of which is RISC OS-specific.

With best wishes,

Peter.

-- 
Peter, \  /  zfc Yb   \ Prestbury, Cheltenham,  Glos. GL52
Anne\/ ____\  England.
and / /  \ | | |\ | /  _\  http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
family /  \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \__ pnyo...@ormail.co.uk



Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:41:26 +0100
Dr Peter Young  wrote:

> > It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further.
> > Maybe I should have come to Wakefield.  
> 
> Not so, I think. Since 2.5 came out there have been several updates
> on the test builds page, at least one of which is RISC OS-specific

Holding a door open for somebody does not mean you've agreed to become
their valet :)

Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt.  It
may continue to be developed, it may not.

B.



Splitting of open brackets and next letter

2010-04-25 Thread Roger Darlington

When bracketted text is in the wrong place on a line, then Netsurf may 
split the open bracket from the next character.

For instance:
rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb (text we dont 
want separating from its brackets) rhubarb rhubarb.

Can get split to:
rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb (
text we dont want separating from its brackets) rhubarb rhubarb.

depending where on a line the bracketted text gets placed. I think 
this has been so over several version, not just NS 2.5.

-- 

Cheers
Roger
Don't play with your food - play with somebody else's.



Re: Splitting of open brackets and next letter

2010-04-25 Thread Brian Jordan
In article ,
   Roger Darlington  wrote:

> When bracketted text is in the wrong place on a line, then Netsurf may 
> split the open bracket from the next character.

[Snip example]

Isn't this what   is for? Without it I think any browser will
perform these arbitary splits if provoked. Obviously this can only be
fixed in one's own pages; other authors may need a nudge.

-- 
_

Brian Jordan
Virtual RPC-AdjustSA
RISC OS 6.20
_




Re: Splitting of open brackets and next letter

2010-04-25 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 25 Apr, Brian Jordan wrote in message
<510da2f319brian.jord...@btinternet.com>:

> In article ,
>Roger Darlington  wrote:
> 
> > When bracketted text is in the wrong place on a line, then Netsurf may
> > split the open bracket from the next character.
> 
> [Snip example]
> 
> Isn't this what   is for? Without it I think any browser will perform
> these arbitary splits if provoked.

Roger's example was bracket-letter, so no space is involved.

-- 
Steve Fryatt - Leeds, England

http://www.stevefryatt.org.uk/



Re: Splitting of open brackets and next letter

2010-04-25 Thread Richard Porter
On 25 Apr 2010 Steve Fryatt wrote:

> On 25 Apr, Brian Jordan wrote in message
> <510da2f319brian.jord...@btinternet.com>:

>> In article ,
>>Roger Darlington  wrote:
>> 
>>> When bracketted text is in the wrong place on a line, then Netsurf may
>>> split the open bracket from the next character.
>> 
>> [Snip example]
>> 
>> Isn't this what   is for? Without it I think any browser will perform
>> these arbitary splits if provoked.

> Roger's example was bracket-letter, so no space is involved.

This is a long-standing problem. I'm sure I've raised a bug report for 
it. NetSurf can also word-wrap at a tag when there's no white space.

-- 
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/
  mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
Confidentiality statement: Imagine 50 lines of pointless verbiage.



Re: Splitting of open brackets and next letter

2010-04-25 Thread Brian Jordan
In article , Steve
Fryatt  wrote:
> On 25 Apr, Brian Jordan wrote in message
> <510da2f319brian.jord...@btinternet.com>:

> > In article , Roger
> >Darlington  wrote:
> > 
> > > When bracketted text is in the wrong place on a line, then Netsurf
> > > may split the open bracket from the next character.
> > 
> > [Snip example]
> > 
> > Isn't this what   is for? Without it I think any browser will
> > perform these arbitary splits if provoked.

> Roger's example was bracket-letter, so no space is involved.

Ah yes, I'll look more closely in future.

-- 
_

Brian Jordan
Virtual RPC-AdjustSA
RISC OS 6.20
_